• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should Zuckerberg run for President in 2020?

Should Zuckerberg run for President?

  • Yes

    Votes: 2 5.7%
  • No

    Votes: 33 94.3%

  • Total voters
    35
I would say that being an arrogant, ignorant, thinned-skinned narcissistic man-child with NO government experience is all the wrong stuff. Not only do I think that, but editorial boards of EVERY major US Newspaper, of both conservative and liberal proclivities, agree.

Well, the two of us are just going to have to wait and see, aren't we? Now me, I haven't thrown in completely with Trump. My line has always been, sometimes even a change for the worse is better than no change at all. So I'll have no issues eating my words in four years, if it comes to that. But if it doesn't, will you eat yours?
 
And while he's overwhelmingly more intelligent than the narcissistic doofus in the oval office, that whole "government experience" thing is awful important.

Yeah. Gotta give him time to become corrupted by the process. Wouldn't want someone with "unrealistic goals and expectations" running the place. That'd be terrible.
 
Last edited:
Why should Zuckerberg be president? Because he invented something? Perhaps George Foreman should run because he sells a cool grill.

My theory is that the CIA/NSA invented Facebook to spy on everyone more easily, and they needed a harmless kid to be the front for it. SpyBook would have been too obvious.
 
Yeah. Gotta give him time to become corrupted by the process. Wouldn't want someone with "unrealistic goals and expectations" running the place. That'd be terrible.

I would have thought that the last guy with zero political experience to get into office would have robbed people of their appetite for that sort of thing.
 
America has already shown that amateur hour in DC is perfectly acceptable... that said, just because the average US voter fails to understand the need for experience and temperament in the position doesn't make it safe or right.

So, even though Zuckerberg has shown that he is indeed concerned about others rather than himself, like the current guy, he still lacks the right stuff, so 'No'.

Yes, but now the Obama era is over and we con move to having an experienced executive in in the Oval Office.
 
And while he's overwhelmingly more intelligent than the narcissistic doofus in the oval office, that whole "government experience" thing is awful important.

Apparently 63 million voters didn't think government experience was all that important.
 
"The likes of which never seen before."

Except:

1. the number is still lower than it was in the 90s.

2. there are 10 cities ahead Chicago when it comes to murder rate per capita.

Those are pluses? If you lived in a town of 100 and one person was shot the murder rate would be higher then Chicago....Jesus H Crist.
 
Apparently 63 million voters didn't think government experience was all that important.

63 million voters didn't have very good judgment.
 
Are you sure 65 million Americans didn't have good judgement when they voted for a community organizer?

Wow, someone really hate communities.
 
That doesn't make sense....But I have feeling someone hates the Constitution and the prevision in the way we elect the President.

The revulsion you had for "community organizing." I can only assume you hate communities. Odd, but whatever works for you.
 
I would have thought that the last guy with zero political experience to get into office would have robbed people of their appetite for that sort of thing.

Except that man had been groomed for a career in politics all his life.
 
Well, the two of us are just going to have to wait and see, aren't we? Now me, I haven't thrown in completely with Trump. My line has always been, sometimes even a change for the worse is better than no change at all. So I'll have no issues eating my words in four years, if it comes to that. But if it doesn't, will you eat yours?

Yes, I pledge here that I will eat my words if I am wrong. I really do hope I am wrong. Copy this and throw in my face in 2020.
 
Are you sure 65 million Americans didn't have good judgement when they voted for a community organizer?

I don't believe the question you pose is what you intended...but Obama was a good choice. Most of the 65 million were very satisfied they made the right choice 8 years later. After all, he had a good blend of elected experience, constitution law (so good, he was actually on staff at one the nation's top 5 law schools) plus, he experienced politics on a grass roots basis, an experience that is rare for presidents, as a community organizer.
 
"The likes of which never seen before."

Except:

1. the number is still lower than it was in the 90s.

2. there are 10 cities ahead Chicago when it comes to murder rate per capita.

Trump Threatens To 'Send In The Feds' Over Chicago's Violent Crime : The Two-Way : NPR

OK this must be the 10 CITIES ahead of Chicago, making Chicago number 11 which is run by a DEMOCRAT

The cities with populations over 200,000 ranked as the most dangerous are:

Detroit, MI – Mayor Mike Duggan – DEMOCRAT
Oakland, CA – Mayor Jean Quan – DEMOCRAT
Memphis, TN – Mayor A C Wharton – DEMOCRAT
St. Louis, MO – Mayor Francis G. Slay – DEMOCRAT
Cleveland, OH – Mayor Frank G. Jackson – DEMOCRAT
Baltimore, MD – Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake – DEMOCRAT
Milwaukee, WI – Mayor Tom Barrett – DEMOCRAT
Birmingham, AL – Mayor William A. Bell – DEMOCRAT
Newark, NJ – Mayor Ras Baraka – DEMOCRAT
Kansas City, MO – Mayor Sly James – Independent (but probably a DEMOCRAT)

The proof is in the politics. It’s a shocker, I know…
 
Back
Top Bottom