• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should Trump have an independent psychiatric evaluation prior to being sworn in?

Would you support Trump having an unbiased psychiatric evaluation?


  • Total voters
    40
Three psychiatrists have written a letter to President Obama expressing grave concern regarding Trump's mental health. They are calling for an independent unbiased psych eval. Would you support Trump being required to have a psychiatric evaluation prior to his being sworn in as president?

What could it hurt? If Trump has nothing to hide what could it hurt?


[/FONT]


t
Source

This was litigated in the election. There were lots of questions about his temperament, particularly his thinned-skinned narcissism. Apparently, too many voters either failed to comprehend the issue or just didn't care. The Electoral College exists to affirm or deny the results of the election, but few of the electors understand their roles, so its just a ceremonial body that will have its big shin-dig on Monday.

I'm afraid we just live with this defective President until such time that the Republicans realize what an embarrassment he is and try to impeach him to set up Pence for a ten year run as POTUS.

Translation: Too late, we had our chance. Now we just need to strap ourselves in, put on a crash helmet and hold on for dear life. Unlike an amusement park ride, there is no guarantee this will be a fun, much less safe.
 
Last edited:
Here's the problem. Any evaluation that does not come up with "He's got the greatest mind of his generation" will not be accepted as unbiased or independent by the Trumpeteers.

...and any evaluation that DOES NOT SAY he is a complete lunatic will not be accepted by the Alt + Left.
 
...and any evaluation that DOES NOT SAY he is a complete lunatic will not be accepted by the Alt + Left.

The only people who say alt-left are idiots who think"alt-right" was invented by liberals to hurt their feelings.
 
The only people who say alt-left are idiots who think"alt-right" was invented by liberals to hurt their feelings.

Yet you did not dispute the truth I spoke.
only the Alt + Left comment.
I am glad you agree with me then.
 
Absolutely not. Should he be required to submit to that, you would also have to expect a full mental evaluation of EVERYONE who takes public office, and lets face it, you can name just about anyone who's had a televised campaign a pathological liar. While not a horrendous idea, it would need to be done PRIOR to the election, a month after the President-Elect is announced. While I'm not the biggest Trump fan on the planet, removing him now would leave Pence in charge. I prefer the Government stay out of anyone else's bedroom.

Look, Trump won. Get over it. Those of us who actually value individual freedom had to deal with Obama for 8 years. YOU. WILL. BE. OKAY.
 
How much punishment must leftists endure? Now you are hoping for a psych eval which proves he is crazy...and then the leftists have to live with knowing that on top of everything else they lost to a crazy person? How much losing can the left handle before they snap?
 
Three psychiatrists have written a letter to President Obama expressing grave concern regarding Trump's mental health. They are calling for an independent unbiased psych eval. Would you support Trump being required to have a psychiatric evaluation prior to his being sworn in as president?

What could it hurt? If Trump has nothing to hide what could it hurt?


[/FONT]



Source
I picked other.I say yes for Trump being subjected to a psychiatric evaluation only if Clinton is being subjected to a combination narcoanalysis and lie detector tests.
 
Only if it was standard practice for every President in the past and in the future.
Disagree .... In the past we had few if any half decent psychiatrists .... This we must learn .. Simply because you do not like someone , does NOT mean that they are "crazy" .. I like Trump NOT , and do not think he is ''nuts'' .. Borderline ... YES ... And so am I ..
 
Disagree .... In the past we had few if any half decent psychiatrists .... This we must learn .. Simply because you do not like someone , does NOT mean that they are "crazy" .. I like Trump NOT , and do not think he is ''nuts'' .. Borderline ... YES ... And so am I ..

Exactly Earthworm. I think every newcomer should undergo a psychiatric evaluation before they are allowed to post messages on Debate Politics. Perhaps you and I and a few others could form a vetting panel to determine if applicants match the required standard of sanity.
 
Three psychiatrists have written a letter to President Obama expressing grave concern regarding Trump's mental health. They are calling for an independent unbiased psych eval. Would you support Trump being required to have a psychiatric evaluation prior to his being sworn in as president?

What could it hurt? If Trump has nothing to hide what could it hurt?


[/FONT]



Source

The voters already did the mental health screening.
 
I picked other.I say yes for Trump being subjected to a psychiatric evaluation only if Clinton is being subjected to a combination narcoanalysis and lie detector tests.

Clinton isn't about to become the President. I don't care if a private citizen is a little off.
 
Only if it was standard practice for every President in the past and in the future.

Sure... kinda like the way we expect presidential candidates to release their taxes, right?:2razz:
 
Three psychiatrists have written a letter to President Obama expressing grave concern regarding Trump's mental health. They are calling for an independent unbiased psych eval. Would you support Trump being required to have a psychiatric evaluation prior to his being sworn in as president?

What could it hurt? If Trump has nothing to hide what could it hurt?


[/FONT]



Source

His painfully low IQ would be publicly exposed. It would be hilarious.
 
The entire premise of this thread is ridiculous, and I no doubt the response to it by many would be filled with far greater indignation and scorn if it was the opposite direction (as evidenced by some posts in this thread.). The idiotic nature of this election season sadly continues
 
Last edited:
do you lefties who wanted Hillary have any clue how silly threads like this look? it just comes off as more sour grapes and butt hurt petulant rantings because you all lost an election you thought was in the bag. Trump has been in the public eye for at least 20 years and none of this crap was ever brought up UNTIL he decided to run as (gasp) A REPUBLICAN.

Until he *WON* as a Republican. But all this proves is that the political left are a bunch of immature children who can't take losing. If Hillary had won, how many of these threads would exist at all? Do you think that the right would be screaming for Hillary to get a psychiatric evaluation. I don't. Liberals are idiots.
 
Until he *WON* as a Republican. But all this proves is that the political left are a bunch of immature children who can't take losing. If Hillary had won, how many of these threads would exist at all? Do you think that the right would be screaming for Hillary to get a psychiatric evaluation. I don't. Liberals are idiots.

In the spirit of fairness, she did run while under a Federal Investigation, which alot of the right would be screaming about had she won. However, there definitely wouldn't be rioting in the streets yelling "not my president", nor this post election nonsense of trying to get a recount after the election was already ceded.
 
No, but he needs an adderal and thorazine enema
 
In the spirit of fairness, she did run while under a Federal Investigation, which alot of the right would be screaming about had she won. However, there definitely wouldn't be rioting in the streets yelling "not my president", nor this post election nonsense of trying to get a recount after the election was already ceded.

But she ran while under federal investigation of her own free will. Trump didn't run while under a psychiatric evaluation that said he was crazy. The left are a bunch of whiny crybabies.
 
Clinton isn't about to become the President. I don't care if a private citizen is a little off.

If we are going to ask a president elect to do something that other presidents elect have not done then why not expand that losing candidates as well?
 
If we are going to ask a president elect to do something that other presidents elect have not done then why not expand that losing candidates as well?

Losing candidates don't matter anymore.
 
Back
Top Bottom