- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
That remark is almost as dumb as claiming Obama did drugs in school...wait.
The evidence was right under their noses!!
That remark is almost as dumb as claiming Obama did drugs in school...wait.
Three psychiatrists have written a letter to President Obama expressing grave concern regarding Trump's mental health. They are calling for an independent unbiased psych eval. Would you support Trump being required to have a psychiatric evaluation prior to his being sworn in as president?
What could it hurt? If Trump has nothing to hide what could it hurt?
[/FONT]
t
Source
This applies to Hillary Clinton too.
Here's the problem. Any evaluation that does not come up with "He's got the greatest mind of his generation" will not be accepted as unbiased or independent by the Trumpeteers.
...and any evaluation that DOES NOT SAY he is a complete lunatic will not be accepted by the Alt + Left.
The only people who say alt-left are idiots who think"alt-right" was invented by liberals to hurt their feelings.
Congratulations on voting for Tweedle-dee instead if Tweedle-dum then.
I picked other.I say yes for Trump being subjected to a psychiatric evaluation only if Clinton is being subjected to a combination narcoanalysis and lie detector tests.Three psychiatrists have written a letter to President Obama expressing grave concern regarding Trump's mental health. They are calling for an independent unbiased psych eval. Would you support Trump being required to have a psychiatric evaluation prior to his being sworn in as president?
What could it hurt? If Trump has nothing to hide what could it hurt?
[/FONT]
Source
Disagree .... In the past we had few if any half decent psychiatrists .... This we must learn .. Simply because you do not like someone , does NOT mean that they are "crazy" .. I like Trump NOT , and do not think he is ''nuts'' .. Borderline ... YES ... And so am I ..Only if it was standard practice for every President in the past and in the future.
Disagree .... In the past we had few if any half decent psychiatrists .... This we must learn .. Simply because you do not like someone , does NOT mean that they are "crazy" .. I like Trump NOT , and do not think he is ''nuts'' .. Borderline ... YES ... And so am I ..
Three psychiatrists have written a letter to President Obama expressing grave concern regarding Trump's mental health. They are calling for an independent unbiased psych eval. Would you support Trump being required to have a psychiatric evaluation prior to his being sworn in as president?
What could it hurt? If Trump has nothing to hide what could it hurt?
[/FONT]
Source
I picked other.I say yes for Trump being subjected to a psychiatric evaluation only if Clinton is being subjected to a combination narcoanalysis and lie detector tests.
The voters already did the mental health screening.
Only if it was standard practice for every President in the past and in the future.
Three psychiatrists have written a letter to President Obama expressing grave concern regarding Trump's mental health. They are calling for an independent unbiased psych eval. Would you support Trump being required to have a psychiatric evaluation prior to his being sworn in as president?
What could it hurt? If Trump has nothing to hide what could it hurt?
[/FONT]
Source
do you lefties who wanted Hillary have any clue how silly threads like this look? it just comes off as more sour grapes and butt hurt petulant rantings because you all lost an election you thought was in the bag. Trump has been in the public eye for at least 20 years and none of this crap was ever brought up UNTIL he decided to run as (gasp) A REPUBLICAN.
Until he *WON* as a Republican. But all this proves is that the political left are a bunch of immature children who can't take losing. If Hillary had won, how many of these threads would exist at all? Do you think that the right would be screaming for Hillary to get a psychiatric evaluation. I don't. Liberals are idiots.
In the spirit of fairness, she did run while under a Federal Investigation, which alot of the right would be screaming about had she won. However, there definitely wouldn't be rioting in the streets yelling "not my president", nor this post election nonsense of trying to get a recount after the election was already ceded.
Clinton isn't about to become the President. I don't care if a private citizen is a little off.
If we are going to ask a president elect to do something that other presidents elect have not done then why not expand that losing candidates as well?
Losing candidates don't matter anymore.