• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should Megan Kelly be fired from Fox?

Should fox fire Megyn Kelly?

  • Yes

    Votes: 5 7.1%

  • No

    Votes: 65 92.9%
  • Total voters
    70
Bucky

Bucky

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 5, 2015
Messages
28,575
Reaction score
6,362
Location
Washington
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Foxnews is getting harder and harder to watch with the overly sexual Megyn Kelly polluting the airways

She's a completely subjective "journalist" that imo is a disgrace to the journalism profession. This woman is obsessed with the subject of sex. People that watch foxnews want to hear fair and balanced news, not an extension of Loveline with Dr. Drew.

I am unsure why she has such a personal axe to grind with Donald Trump. Perhaps she is doing it for selfish reasons - attract more popularity and attention. Perhaps she is auditioning for another show and get a bigger contract.

Remember, this "journalist" has no problem with going on the Howard Stern show and talking about her breasts and her husbands penis.

That interview with Newt just crossed the line for me. Newt completely exposed Megyn for the fraud she is.

Foxnews is becoming more like the tablouds and they really need to get rid of the cancers on that station - Shep Smith and Megyn Kelly being the two biggest culprits.
 
Fox News isn't becoming anything else. You're shifting hard to the right.
 
She's too big in too important of a time slot. CNN won't offer her what is rumored to be $20 million year, but I doubt Fox is interested in her at that price either. She is plainly taking advantage of the disarray caused by Ailes leaving, and IMO, is over playing her hand.

She has come under a lot of industry criticism for bring overly "cutsie, flirty, and sexy" on the heels of her battles with Trump, and fails to see her own metaphor.

There will be a financial negotiation that will decide her future.
 
Megyn Kelly isn't going anywhere until her current contract is up. As for Kelly herself, she appears to me to be a conservative moderate that moves to the left when it comes to woman's issues.

Also, the spelling of her name is annoying. Which of her parents was the dumbass that replaced the a with a y? Who in the **** even does that?
 
Last edited:
Bucky said:
Foxnews is getting harder and harder to watch with the overly sexual Megyn Kelly polluting the airways

She's a completely subjective "journalist" that imo is a disgrace to the journalism profession. This woman is obsessed with the subject of sex. People that watch foxnews want to hear fair and balanced news, not an extension of Loveline with Dr. Drew.

I am unsure why she has such a personal axe to grind with Donald Trump. Perhaps she is doing it for selfish reasons - attract more popularity and attention. Perhaps she is auditioning for another show and get a bigger contract.

Remember, this "journalist" has no problem with going on the Howard Stern show and talking about her breasts and her husbands penis.

That interview with Newt just crossed the line for me. Newt completely exposed Megyn for the fraud she is.

Foxnews is becoming more like the tablouds and they really need to get rid of the cancers on that station - Shep Smith and Megyn Kelly being the two biggest culprits.
Click to expand...

has trump been accused of sex related crimes? becase that might have an effect on the election if that can be shown

so asking about that seems relevant

newt seems to have taken a question as an accusation and then launched into an atack on the person asking it

the man was a dumb ass and a hypocrite

 
Other--Don't know don't care.

Who the hell is Megyn Kelly and who actually waste so much time watching "news" when it can be read much quicker?
 
Shine a spotline and the roaches will flee.

Megyn Kelly has demonstrated better journalism than a significant chunk of reporters from several media outlets. She is not afraid to hold these boys' feet to the fire. And they can. Not. Take. It.

LOVE it! :thumbs:
 
Not my fight since I don't watch Fox News, but Gingrich came off like a whiny, petulant baby.
 
Bucky said:
Foxnews is getting harder and harder to watch with the overly sexual Megyn Kelly polluting the airways

She's a completely subjective "journalist" that imo is a disgrace to the journalism profession. This woman is obsessed with the subject of sex. People that watch foxnews want to hear fair and balanced news, not an extension of Loveline with Dr. Drew.

I am unsure why she has such a personal axe to grind with Donald Trump. Perhaps she is doing it for selfish reasons - attract more popularity and attention. Perhaps she is auditioning for another show and get a bigger contract.

Remember, this "journalist" has no problem with going on the Howard Stern show and talking about her breasts and her husbands penis.

That interview with Newt just crossed the line for me. Newt completely exposed Megyn for the fraud she is.

Foxnews is becoming more like the tablouds and they really need to get rid of the cancers on that station - Shep Smith and Megyn Kelly being the two biggest culprits.
Click to expand...

She also had no problem collecting those paychecks from Roger Ailes, who may have been making her sit on his lap, as he did to the others.

Hypocrite much Megan?
 
Last edited:
truthatallcost said:
She also had no problem collecting those patchecks from Roger Ailes, who may have been making her sit on his lap, as he did to the others.

Hypocrite much Megan?
Click to expand...

She will pay regardless. A ditzy blonde trying to frame the issue in her favor.
 
Bucky said:
She will pay regardless. A ditzy blonde trying to frame the issue in her favor.
Click to expand...

In response to your OP, "why is Megan Kelly anti-Trump"....
Donald Trump called her a semi-bad word about 3 years ago, and Megan Kelly apparently is so petty, she'd rather elect Hillary Clinton than grow the f up and realize that this election isn't about her.
 
truthatallcost said:
She also had no problem collecting those paychecks from Roger Ailes, who may have been making her sit on his lap, as he did to the others.

Hypocrite much Megan?
Click to expand...

so your saying she has been harassed to and bieng agaisnt sexual harassment makes her a hypocrite somehow?
 
blarg said:
so your saying she has been harassed to and bieng agaisnt sexual harassment makes her a hypocrite somehow?
Click to expand...

Did she speak out before Gretchen Carlson made it acceptable to do so? Nope.
Did she put her integrity before having a big TV show. Nooop.
She basically did nothing about Ailes, and she expects us to think she's a journalist? Nooooop.
 
Bucky said:
She will pay regardless. A ditzy blonde trying to frame the issue in her favor.
Click to expand...

how was she ditzy? and whats her hair color have to do with anything?

your posts in this thread seem rather ditzy as you would say
 
truthatallcost said:
In response to your OP, "why is Megan Kelly anti-Trump"....
Donald Trump called her a semi-bad word about 3 years ago, and Megan Kelly apparently is so petty, she'd rather elect Hillary Clinton than grow the f up and realize that this election isn't about her.
Click to expand...

or maybe she has genuine and reasonable concerns about what kind of man he is and you would rather atack her becase it serves your own desire of wanting trump to win the election
 
truthatallcost said:
Did she speak out before Gretchen Carlson made it acceptable to do so? Nope.
Did she put her integrity before having a big TV show. Nooop.
She basically did nothing about Ailes, and she expects us to think she's a journalist? Nooooop.
Click to expand...

are you not just speculating that she had to give sexul favers to begin with?

do you have any evidence these women confided their story's to her in the past and that she was keeping quiet about them?

still dont see how her or any one else who dosent molest others can be hypocritical about bieng against sexul harassment
 
Bucky said:
Foxnews is getting harder and harder to watch with the overly sexual Megyn Kelly polluting the airways

She's a completely subjective "journalist" that imo is a disgrace to the journalism profession. This woman is obsessed with the subject of sex. People that watch foxnews want to hear fair and balanced news, not an extension of Loveline with Dr. Drew.

I am unsure why she has such a personal axe to grind with Donald Trump. Perhaps she is doing it for selfish reasons - attract more popularity and attention. Perhaps she is auditioning for another show and get a bigger contract.

Remember, this "journalist" has no problem with going on the Howard Stern show and talking about her breasts and her husbands penis.

That interview with Newt just crossed the line for me. Newt completely exposed Megyn for the fraud she is.

Foxnews is becoming more like the tablouds and they really need to get rid of the cancers on that station - Shep Smith and Megyn Kelly being the two biggest culprits.
Click to expand...

so far 11 no votes out of 11 votes

me thinks you just want are attention
 
blarg said:
or maybe she has genuine and reasonable concerns about what kind of man he is and you would rather atack her becase it serves your own desire of wanting trump to win the election
Click to expand...

So she's concerned about Trump, when she doesn't know that any of the allegations against him are true, yet she was unconcerned publicly about Roger Ailes, who she knew to be an abuser of women?

I'm not buying it. I think her fragile ego was bruised by Trump, and now she's on a warpath to see him defeated.
 
i think being the person to set the narritive and never denounce it for a equivocation fallacy where individual condemnations were misconstrued as global condemnations for all women, yeah, this isn't tough journalism, this is filthy lies of a common sort called equivocation fallacy. she should be fired just for that.
 
truthatallcost said:
So she's concerned about Trump, when she doesn't know that any of the allegations against him are true, yet she was unconcerned publicly about Roger Ailes, who she knew to be an abuser of women?

I'm not buying it. I think her fragile ego was bruised by Trump, and now she's on a warpath to see him defeated.
Click to expand...

well other then what he has been known to say

did she claim that those allegations are true some place?

just in case you dont post it in response to my last reply how do you know she knew about ailes?

thats what you believe yes

can you show that what you believe is actuly true in this case?
 
after that she should be fired again for being Rotary's hitman.
 
blarg said:
well other then what he has been known to say

did she claim that those allegations are true some place?

just in case you dont post it in response to my last reply how do you know she knew about ailes?

thats what you believe yes

can you show that what you believe is actuly true in this case?
Click to expand...

Didn't you say Ailes sexually harassed her?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom