Should Megan Kelly be fired from Fox?

Bucky said:

Where is the actual evidence?

Click to expand...

Bruh. Answer my question.

Here we have a thread that indeed mentions incriminating yourself, and the prisoners don't seem to have a clue about stupidity. Alex Jones is on the cutting edge, no matter what prisoner has a problem with that fact. No amount of education, either, can do a thing about stupidity, it must do violence to itself, turn on itself. That is why AJ is beyond the prisoners here, squinting out from their position in the curare-resin Matrix, caught fast by the information-compromised hormones of youth. "Chewy! Can you hear me?! Can you see me?!"

upsideguy said:

The U6 number is actually a testament to a good economy: people can afford to retire, stay in school, be stay at home moms.

I am not sure who these people are that you think should be working. The US unemployment rate is 4.9%. It is as low as 3.0% and even less in many states. This is considered full employment. An economy in paralysis is not typically characterized by full employment.

Unemployment Rates for States

We have a mature economy, including a mature population. Most of the spending in our economy is done by persons under 50....So, while its fun to bash Obama for slow economic growth and people out of the workforce, your anger is misdirected. You need to bash your grandmother for getting older, not buying new houses, cars and furniture and not wanting work anymore.


For Economy, Aging Population Poses Double Whammy - WSJ
America?s Aging Population and Slowing Economic Growth - The Diane Rehm Show
Demography, growth and inequality: Age invaders | The Economist


...and, while we are whipping you behind the woodshed, your impression that no one is starting businesses is also wrong.

Business start-up activity is surging. Here's why.

Click to expand...

Thanks for this post.

I'm blown away by all the talk from the Trump campaign and some GOP corners, as to how badly our economy is supposedly doing!

The last few years have been pretty good from what I can see anecdotally amongst friends, family, and business associates. And all the relevant national numbers look pretty good too, that I can see.

But there seems to be citizens following these guys that personally feel they are doing badly economically. I chalk it up to perhaps a divide between demographics and geography. If you're a professional, educated, and urban - chances are things feel O.K. If your rural, uneducated, moderate or low skilled, rustbelt - then maybe you're not too happy. Disparate stereotypes obviously, but just trying to illustrate.

But here's what I see:

- Low interest rates
- Low inflation
- Stable & rising housing markets
- Strong equity markets
- Low unemployment (approaching full employment in many states/areas)
- Rising wages
- Workplace participation rising

And perhaps most importantly: Steady easy growth in all the above, but not racing to a bubble!

So what's not to like?

Chomsky said:

Thanks for this post.

I'm blown away by all the talk from the Trump campaign and some GOP corners, as to how badly our economy is supposedly doing!

The last few years have been pretty good from what I can see anecdotally amongst friends, family, and business associates. And all the relevant national numbers look pretty good too, that I can see.

But there seems to be citizens following these guys that personally feel they are doing badly economically. I chalk it up to perhaps a divide between demographics and geography. If you're a professional, educated, and urban - chances are things feel O.K. If your rural, uneducated, moderate or low skilled, rustbelt - then maybe you're not too happy. Disparate stereotypes obviously, but just trying to illustrate.

But here's what I see:

- Low interest rates
- Low inflation
- Stable & rising housing markets
- Strong equity markets
- Low unemployment (approaching full employment in many states/areas)
- Rising wages
- Workplace participation rising

And perhaps most importantly: Steady easy growth in all the above, but not racing to a bubble!

So what's not to like?

Click to expand...

The wealthy see small income gains the same way the poor see income losses. They take for granted that the lions share of economic gains have gone to them for 40 years :



And the wealthy have a disproportionate influence over the headlines.

badger2 said:

Here we have a thread that indeed mentions incriminating yourself, and the prisoners don't seem to have a clue about stupidity. Alex Jones is on the cutting edge, no matter what prisoner has a problem with that fact. No amount of education, either, can do a thing about stupidity, it must do violence to itself, turn on itself. That is why AJ is beyond the prisoners here, squinting out from their position in the curare-resin Matrix, caught fast by the information-compromised hormones of youth. "Chewy! Can you hear me?! Can you see me?!"

Click to expand...

So... acid's back, then?

truthatallcost said:

I've now produced 2 separate articles discussing Kelly's harassment. Kelly herself is keeping her prized information to herself, until her book comes out.



We're currently dealing with your denial. Kelly's claim is in her book. On sale soon!




Are you typing in Old English?

Yes Kelly is a hypocrite, because she remained silent publicly while several women were being harassed in Kelly's own place of work , but now she devotes countless hours of her TV show to insinuating that Trump sexually harassed women.

See how that works?

Click to expand...

2 articles without names or proof

and more bull**** form you admitting you dont know what the truth is mr atallcost

so did she know about the harassment?

truthatallcost said:

Was she sexually harassed by Donald Trump?
Did Trump call her an airhead bimbo?

One answer is yes, and the other is no. Can you figure out which is which?

Click to expand...

some one who has been harassed has every right to be against harassment and it makes sense for them to be

hopefully you can comprehend that becase it woudl also explain her problem with trump even if trump never touched her

American said:

She's smart, but he blond hair and great body didn't hurt her any. Think she wore a potato sack to her job interview? Doubt it. Her sexy pics floating around the Internet appear to be enough to show her hypocrisy.

Click to expand...

um how would her looking sexy in a picture make her a hypocrite?

Bucky said:

She's an obnoxious whore that has a dirty mouth talking about her breasts and her husbands penis on public airwaves with Howard Stern.

Click to expand...

aww who says controversial things You do! yes you do. Good job.

truthatallcost said:

She's going to devote a whole chapter to Roger Ailes and his gropey hands in her new book.
Who would have thought that liberals would be first in line to buy a Megyn Kelly book?

Click to expand...

and when you post the passages from that book that say that i can congratulate you on not bieng full of **** on this point

BlackCat said:

she's completely trying to backseat drive the republican party. she should be fired just for trying to undermine democracy.

Click to expand...

that makes no sense

blarg said:

um how would her looking sexy in a picture make her a hypocrite?

Click to expand...

She wants respect for women, then has sexy photos of herself taken. You haven't see all the photos I take it? She ain't squeaky clean.

American said:

She wants respect for women, then has sexy photos of herself taken. You haven't see all the photos I take it? She ain't squeaky clean.

Click to expand...

why should you not respect women with sexy photos?

blarg said:

why should you not respect women with sexy photos?

Click to expand...

A lot of irony there.

Many dollars to a few doughnuts . . MSNBC would love to have her .. as I would .

American said:

A lot of irony there.

Click to expand...

um how so? did she say you should not?

Absentglare said:

The wealthy see small income gains the same way the poor see income losses. They take for granted that the lions share of economic gains have gone to them for 40 years :

And the wealthy have a disproportionate influence over the headlines.

Click to expand...

Well, yes these trends have been going on for quite a while. But while some things like factory work has gone down, other things like I.T. and Healthcare do very well.

We will always have to make sensible personal choices as to what and where we do business.

But I was speaking about the economy in general, and where we are in relation to where we just were. Right now things have been doing pretty well under Obama. We are expanding remarkably steadily, and recently rising wages are an excellent example of this.

Check this out: NYT: U.S. Economy Grew 2.9% in 3rd Quarter, Picking Up the Pace

But while we're moving along smoothly, we are not going gangbusters - and that's why I fear Trump. It took 8 long years, several of them very dark, to get to the point of rising wages; and I believe a Trump Presidency will destroy all that. Our economy is doing reasonably well, but is not so robust as to withstand extreme shock! Trump would plunge us into the abyss!

Man, don't really know what all the fuss is about Megan Kelly. I don't watch her show. She's become visible to me via articles written about her combative opinions. But after reading what I have about her, I'd rather vote for Kelly over Trump or Clinton any day.

Why are people watching any cable pundit networks of any lean? Gezzzus, they really **** people's minds up. :roll:

Chomsky said:

Well, yes these trends have been going on for quite a while. But while some things like factory work has gone down, other things like I.T. and Healthcare do very well.

We will always have to make sensible personal choices as to what and where we do business.

But I was speaking about the economy in general, and where we are in relation to where we just were. Right now things have been doing pretty well under Obama. We are expanding remarkably steadily, and recently rising wages are an excellent example of this.

Check this out: NYT: U.S. Economy Grew 2.9% in 3rd Quarter, Picking Up the Pace

But while we're moving along smoothly, we are not going gangbusters - and that's why I fear Trump. It took 8 long years, several of them very dark, to get to the point of rising wages; and I believe a Trump Presidency will destroy all that. Our economy is doing reasonably well, but is not so robust as to withstand extreme shock! Trump would plunge us into the abyss!

Click to expand...

Absolutely, unemployment is down and that's heavily related to wages :



Many Americans feel that they are far better off than they were 8 years ago. And i'd bet that many on Wall Street are bemoaning how their annual bonuses are not growing like they used to prior to the housing crash.

The fact of the matter is that when the average American makes gains, that essentially must take from somewhere, and it's actually a good thing to apply some downward pressure against the largesse at the tip of our socioeconomic spectrum.

Especially after the American public lost trillions bailing out wealthy crooks.

Absentglare said:

Absolutely, unemployment is down and that's heavily related to wages :

Many Americans feel that they are far better off than they were 8 years ago. And i'd bet that many on Wall Street are bemoaning how their annual bonuses are not growing like they used to prior to the housing crash.

The fact of the matter is that when the average American makes gains, that essentially must take from somewhere, and it's actually a good thing to apply some downward pressure against the largesse at the tip of our socioeconomic spectrum.

Especially after the American public lost trillions bailing out wealthy crooks.

Click to expand...

With me, you don't have to try very hard to make the argument for a little less at the top, to be spread down in the middle & below.

In this - you're the preacher, and I'm the choir!

Bucky said:

Foxnews is getting harder and harder to watch with the overly sexual Megyn Kelly polluting the airways

She's a completely subjective "journalist" that imo is a disgrace to the journalism profession. This woman is obsessed with the subject of sex. People that watch foxnews want to hear fair and balanced news, not an extension of Loveline with Dr. Drew.

I am unsure why she has such a personal axe to grind with Donald Trump. Perhaps she is doing it for selfish reasons - attract more popularity and attention. Perhaps she is auditioning for another show and get a bigger contract.

Remember, this "journalist" has no problem with going on the Howard Stern show and talking about her breasts and her husbands penis.

That interview with Newt just crossed the line for me. Newt completely exposed Megyn for the fraud she is.

Foxnews is becoming more like the tablouds and they really need to get rid of the cancers on that station - Shep Smith and Megyn Kelly being the two biggest culprits.

Click to expand...

You mean she made one of the surrogates of the Donald look like the raving lunatic that he is? Check

You mean she called out Trump for what he possibly is (AKA a sexual pervert/predator)? Check

Because she successfully and accurately shot all the pathetic excuses from Trump regarding his sexual assaulting women and his disgusting chat on the bus out of the air? Check

And why she may have an issue with the man who has tweeted/said about Megyn Kelly:

Astonishingly Biased

She's a Bimbo

She's A Loser

Unbecoming and a Total Failure

Blood Came Out of Her 'Wherever'

more bimbo talk

She's a Lightweight

Very Little Talent

She's a Hater

She's Overrated

She's Dopey—And She Lies

She's Average—Who the Hell Wants to Woo Her!

Unbearable to Watch

the bimbo that's asking presidential questions?

Always Negative—Get a Life!

She Knows Nothing

She's Too Lame

She's Crazy

She's Still Crazy

No Seriously, She's Crazy

Can't Stand Her

Highly Overrated & Crazy

Really, She's Crazy

She Has a Sick Obsession

She's Crazy

Most Overrated Person on TV

and more accusations of crazy Megyn Kelly


What on earth could Megyn Kelly dislike about the Donald, it really is mind boggling :roll:

And could you get more pathetic? She talked dirty on the Howard Stern show, shocking that 6 years ago she talked about sex on the show of a shock jock. Again mind boggling. Ooh by the way, could we then also talk about the insane number of inappropriate and insane things the Donald said on that same show?

Trump is a pathetic loser and so are his surrogates morons, they love to dish out but when talked back to they whine like pathetic little Trump apologists do when faced with opposition (which mostly means people confront them with the truth/reality).

I only read the first several posts.

Kelly's not a laughable egomaniac like Orally or a lying jerk hack like Handjob. To me, that's what distinguishes her show from the rest of the Faux evening lineup.

It's quite clear what's going on here. Frump the Pig is going to get his ass kicked, and deservedly so. I'm a liberal and I've had mixed feelings for years regarding clowns like Limpblow, Coulter, Ingraham, etc. They poison our political culture, but they're so whacked out and full of it that they've now crippled the Republican party, making Democrats more electable. They like to say the Left hates them, but the fact is we love 'em.

If it weren't for these lunatics, the GOP would have nominated an electable candidate like Kasich or Bush, and likely take back the WH. It's painful to have a third of the electorate swimming in the sewer of mindless RW lies they peddle, but at the same time it's probably the only way liberals can regain control of the gubmint. Where else can moderates and Independents go?