• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who won Debate #3?

Who won Debate #3?

  • Clinton Won!

    Votes: 39 61.9%

  • Trump Won!

    Votes: 15 23.8%

  • Tie..

    Votes: 9 14.3%
  • Total voters
    63
disneydude said:
LOL....I love how the Trumpets are trying to play this line.....completely different situation. If on election night, the race comes down to one state with a razor thin margin (which it won't...but hypothetically speaking....), no one would fault Trump for contesting the results. HERE he was saying that he won't say whether he would accept the results of the election PERIOD. It plays right into his "everything is rigged" propaganda that plays right into the minds of his poorly educated base.
Click to expand...

In case you haven't seen my other statements on this subject... I am not voting for Trump, nor do I support Trump. Trumpet? Nice attempt at a deflection, however inaccurate.
 
Politically i don't think either did better or worse, except for Trump's insane suggestion he would both cry endlessly after losing (directly contradicting the end of debate #1 when he said he'd support Hillary) and that he's effectively already lost due to her rigging an election where not a single vote has been counted

In terms of actual debating, Trump resorted to too many promises he could never hope to elaborate on
 
disneydude said:
LOL....I love how the Trumpets are trying to play this line.....completely different situation. If on election night, the race comes down to one state with a razor thin margin (which it won't...but hypothetically speaking....), no one would fault Trump for contesting the results. HERE he was saying that he won't say whether he would accept the results of the election PERIOD. It plays right into his "everything is rigged" propaganda that plays right into the minds of his poorly educated base.
Click to expand...

It's amazing how they're sore losers and comparing it to 2000 when not a single vote has been counted. Also, although the electoral may be close, Trump hasn't a prayer of winning the popular vote like Gore did
 
Phys251 said:
BlameTheMediaPoints += 1;
Click to expand...


The pro democrat party national media is worth more than one point for me.

They are totally in the back pocket of obama and hillary.
 
Mac7 said:
The pro democrat party national media is worth more than one point for me.

They are totally in the back pocket of obama and hillary.
Click to expand...
:lamo

Yep, y'all keep on telling yourselves that!
 
Phys251 said:
:lamo

Yep, y'all keep on telling yourselves that!
Click to expand...


I will because it is true

The liberal news media are just clones of each other and completely biased toward the democrat party
 
Phys251 said:
:lamo

Tell you what. You learn how to spell Democratic correctly and then get back to me. Until then, try to understand why this:

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/

Is your current reality. :)
Click to expand...

I spelled "democrat" correctly

Not calling them the democratic party merely denotes what I think they are not

Because clearly the goal of liberals in that organization is one party rule modeled on the failed soviet dictatorships throughout the world.
 
Phys251 said:
:lamo

Tell you what. You learn how to spell Democratic correctly and then get back to me. Until then, try to understand why this:

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/


Is your current reality. :)
Click to expand...

I am curious why you think you are winning an argument about the bias in the news by posting a poll that sort of confirms what Mac7 alleges?

every four years this board is filled with people who seem to think they are smarter and better than others based on how the candidate(s) they support are doing. Now if you were responsible for Hillary being in the lead in many polls, then it might have some validity but in this discussion, its worthless.

And Mac7 is correct, the MSM oozes support for Hillary. Since 1980, MSM reporters covering presidential elections have always voted for the DNC's candidate 85% or more of the time. Lots of the big political shows-like MTP-are chaired by people who aren't just liberal hacks, they are professional liberal hacks like the guy who was Tom Harkin's presidential campaign manager and whose wife owns a mass mailing business that caters to the DNC and progressive causes
 
TurtleDude said:
I am curious why you think you are winning an argument about the bias in the news by posting a poll that sort of confirms what Mac7 alleges?

every four years this board is filled with people who seem to think they are smarter and better than others based on how the candidate(s) they support are doing. Now if you were responsible for Hillary being in the lead in many polls, then it might have some validity but in this discussion, its worthless.

And Mac7 is correct, the MSM oozes support for Hillary. Since 1980, MSM reporters covering presidential elections have always voted for the DNC's candidate 85% or more of the time. Lots of the big political shows-like MTP-are chaired by people who aren't just liberal hacks, they are professional liberal hacks like the guy who was Tom Harkin's presidential campaign manager and whose wife owns a mass mailing business that caters to the DNC and progressive causes
Click to expand...

Very few MSM venues are bigger hacks than Fox News, a network that is nothing more than a 24/7 cheerleader for the GOP.
 
calamity said:
Very few MSM venues are bigger hacks than Fox News, a network that is nothing more than a 24/7 cheerleader for the GOP.
Click to expand...


not really. the local news on 19 (Cincinnati-FOX) was sounding pro hillary. But even if what you say is true (and I believe you on the national network), that hardly balances the hard core Hillary Fluffing from ABC, NBC, CBS
 
TurtleDude said:
not really. the local news on 19 (Cincinnati-FOX) was sounding pro hillary. But even if what you say is true (and I believe you on the national network), that hardly balances the hard core Hillary Fluffing from ABC, NBC, CBS
Click to expand...

Yeah, I definitely meant the national network.

The big three were always pretty crappy, and pretty much are and always were shills for the liberals. I agree with you there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom