Sherman123
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2012
- Messages
- 7,774
- Reaction score
- 3,791
- Location
- Northeast US
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
It's always called a mental thing by the media, when White's commit massacres.
Because 'Black on Black Crime' is a euphemism for the disproportionate violence that afflicts the inner cities of this country, specifically areas where black Americans predominate. Calling it 'Black on Black Crime' was originally an emotive way to draw attention to the issues of rampant crime within the community. It was originally a rallying cry to try and get communities and local government to address the issue of urban decay and spiraling crime rates. It also was quickly adopted as a plank for attacking sentencing disparities where there was a black perpetrator and the victim was white.
One of the first famous public uses of the phrase came from Ebony Magazine in 1973, several years after its first recorded usage in the Chicago Daily Defender to protest spiraling crime rates, and here is a small excerpt to give context:
“The black criminal must be told in no uncertain terms that his assaults and his thievery and his dope-pushing and his murders will no longer be suffered in silence.”
Given the unique origin and long history of the phrase, it's different meaning to different audiences at different times, and it's evocative symbology, it's only natural that it would continue to persist in our modern political lexicon. Groups and individuals as disparate as President Obama, Jesse Jackson, and Bill O'Reilly use it freely whether they intend to put across the same message or not and I don't see that changing.
We don't call the massacres and shootings in this country 'white on white crime' because it isn't very accurate, isn't particularly useful as a rallying cry for a political issue, and therefore wouldn't serve as an effective euphemism for any issue in particular. Which is why no one uses it.
Examining the Origins of the Phrase 'Black-on-Black Crime' - CityLab