You are reinforcing my previous point. This theory belongs in the conspiracy section, and I assume it was moved there. How can you add to the discussion, when you believe something that is to its core, untrue.
In a jury room we'd have a hung jury.
I am not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that he hasn't perpetrated a fraud on all of America.
And if you saw and read all that I have, I'd like to believe you would vote as I would.
But as it stands I believe your certainty is more based on faith than proof.
Your threshold is lower than mine.
Maybe you are a superficial type of person. Light and breezy. Sparkling wit. Take things and people at face value. Very emotional. Committed to causes you don't feel the need to fully investigate beyond the superficial.
I'm just postulating.
That might not be at all accurate.
But it would be representative of millions of people who simply saw he was a good looking, smooth talking, articulate Black man who the leaders of their party and the Liberal media endorsed.
And that was enough.
Except, it wasn't.
And we have ALL paid for that type of breezy-ness and the errors in judgement we made in 2008 and 2012.
Serious questions about him remain and he ain't talkin. Doesn't have to.
And yet the mysteries remain.
And the surest proof of that will be if you ask me, "what mysteries?"
Because that will mean you haven't done your due diligence.
And that is why I have doubts and you don't.