• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If we'd known the truth about Islam would we & should we have invaded Iraq?

If we'd known the truth about Islam would we & should we have invaded Iraq?

  • Would we have invaded? Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • SHOULD we have invaded? Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    24
I see that I have moved from being labeled a Muslim, a derogatory term by people of your ilk.
Now I am a 5th columnist.
Kerilley you sure are slow like.
You should research those hate site for better comebacks.
Let me help you.
Now off you go and see you in a few centuries.
You have schooling, badly in need of it.

Search terms
Muslim hate sites
https://www.google.ca/?gws_rd=ssl#q=muslim+hate+sites
results
About 1,680,000 results (0.36 seconds)

anti Muslim hate sites
https://www.google.ca/?gws_rd=ssl#q=anti+muslim+hate+sites
About 21,100,000 results (0.30 seconds)

All hate sites are evil. The only difference is that muslim hate sites will carry out mass attacks over and over again throughout the world. The anti muslim hate sites (though evil as well) are a reaction to those evil acts committed by those particular muslims.
 
All hate sites are evil. The only difference is that muslim hate sites will carry out mass attacks over and over again throughout the world. The anti muslim hate sites (though evil as well) are a reaction to those evil acts committed by those particular muslims.

In the US over 200 thousand homicides after 911 till approx 2012.
How many died from terror attacks in the US.

Hate does breed hate.
What I see is how that hatred is then extended to Muslims that are citizens of Western Democracies.
That for some all Muslims are the enemy.
 
Last edited:
I am much to old and been thru Hell more than enough times to not give a tinkers damn about appearing foolish.
Your posts are what defined you.

I see that I have moved from being labeled a Muslim, a derogatory term by people of your ilk.
Now I am a 5th columnist.
Kerilley you sure are slow like.
You should research those hate site for better comebacks.
Let me help you.
Now off you go and see you in a few centuries.
You have schooling, badly in need of it.

Search terms
Muslim hate sites
https://www.google.ca/?gws_rd=ssl#q=muslim+hate+sites
results
About 1,680,000 results (0.36 seconds)

anti Muslim hate sites
https://www.google.ca/?gws_rd=ssl#q=anti+muslim+hate+sites
About 21,100,000 results (0.30 seconds)

Ladies and Gents,

You are witness to the dilema which will one day confound us all and all across the land.

Who can we trust?

We know that the Islamic prime directive is for Muslims to conquer all of mankind for Allah.

We know that all Muslims, by definition, are Jihadists by way of religious obligation and via four methods.

Hand, Mouth, Money and the Sword.

We know that the Islamic Prime Directive to make all men bow to Allah will be accomplished by Muslims.

We know Muslims have a special dispensation from the Prophet to lie in order to avoid detection or persecution. This is called Taqiyya.

And we know the pattern which has been used in other countries to Islamize those nations and peoples against their wills and without their knowledge that it was happening until it was too late to stop or prevent or reverse.

The thing we must do is to become educated and the best place I have seen to do that is at www.politicalislam.com

The posters here who criticize my posts are of three possible categories.

Kafirs, unbelievers who are unaware of the threat of Islam and the goals and the nature of Islam.

Active Jihadi working as best they can to accelerate the Islamization of America and the realization of the goal of total domination of the world.

And the third category are those in betweeners.

Apologists, either Muslim or kafir, who want to believe Islam is just like Christianity and who cling to that belief without ever finding out the truth.

And just as they are difficult to discern on the internet, one from the other, so will it be impossible to determine who among us is trustworthy in real life.

I say that the only possible way we can avert the storm about to befall us is to immediately impose a ban on all immigration from Muslim countries in order to prevent Muslims populations in the USA from exceeding the stage which Dr. Peter Hammond's studies indicate are the beginning stages of problems in the host countries.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2011/05/the_five_stages_of_islam.html

As long as we are able to keep Muslim populations here to less than the Stage Two level the Muslims in America should, if the pattern holds true, be calm and good neighbors and as we all like to believe them to be.

They won't pose much of a problem to us, nor we to them.

If their numbers grow larger than that we will make the same mistake the Europeans already have, to their regret.

We must take action now to prevent the storm .
 
Last edited:
I am much to old and been thru Hell more than enough times to not give a tinkers damn about appearing foolish.
Your posts are what defined you.

In the US over 200 thousand homicides after 911 till approx 2012.
How many died from terror attacks in the US.

Hate does breed hate.
What I see is how that hatred is then extended to Muslims that are citizens of Western Democracies.
That for some all Muslims are the enemy.

You know in the zombie movies where they all look normal but you KNOW they aren't all normal and you can't tell who is and who isn't a zombie until it is too late?

That is closer to the actual dynamic.

We can't trust you.
 
All hate sites are evil. The only difference is that muslim hate sites will carry out mass attacks over and over again throughout the world. The anti muslim hate sites (though evil as well) are a reaction to those evil acts committed by those particular muslims.

:applaud
 
Ladies and Gents,

You are witness to the dilema which will one day confound us all and all across the land.

Who can we trust?

We know that the Islamic prime directive is for Muslims to conquer all of mankind for Allah.

We know that all Muslims, by definition, are Jihadists by way of religious obligation and via four methods.

Hand, Mouth, Money and the Sword.

We know that the Islamic Prime Directive to make all men bow to Allah will be accomplished by Muslims.

We know Muslims have a special dispensation from the Prophet to lie in order to avoid detection or persecution. This is called Taqiyya.

And we know the pattern which has been used in other countries to Islamize those nations and peoples against their wills and without their knowledge that it was happening until it was too late to stop or prevent or reverse.

The thing we must do is to become educated and the best place I have seen to do that is at Political Islam - Islam's ideology about unbelievers, Kafirs

The posters here who criticize my posts are of three possible categories.

Kafirs, unbelievers who are unaware of the threat of Islam and the goals and the nature of Islam.

Active Jihadi working as best they can to accelerate the Islamization of America and the realization of the goal of total domination of the world.

And the third category are those in betweeners.

Apologists, either Muslim or kafir, who want to believe Islam is just like Christianity and who cling to that belief without ever finding out the truth.

And just as they are difficult to discern on the internet, one from the other, so will it be impossible to determine who among us is trustworthy in real life.

I say that the only possible way we can avert the storm about to befall us is to immediately impose a ban on all immigration from Muslim countries in order to prevent Muslims populations in the USA from exceeding the stage which Dr. Peter Hammond's studies indicate are the beginning stages of problems in the host countries.

Articles: The Five Stages of Islam

As long as we are able to keep Muslim populations here to less than the Stage Two level the Muslims in America should, if the pattern holds true, be calm and good neighbors and as we all like to believe them to be.

They won't pose much of a problem to us, nor we to them.

If their numbers grow larger than that we will make the same mistake the Europeans already have, to their regret.

We must take action now to prevent the storm .
What action do you recommend?
You do have a plan?
 
You know in the zombie movies where they all look normal but you KNOW they aren't all normal and you can't tell who is and who isn't a zombie until it is too late?

That is closer to the actual dynamic.

We can't trust you.
Now you classify me as a traitor to my country.
Did you ever serve your country in a capacity where you willingly accept unlimited liability?
 
You know in the zombie movies where they all look normal but you KNOW they aren't all normal and you can't tell who is and who isn't a zombie until it is too late.
What's next, I am a Vampire?
 
What action do you recommend?
You do have a plan?

You don't miss much do you?

Taz said:
I say that the only possible way we can avert the storm about to befall us is to immediately impose a ban on all immigration from Muslim countries in order to prevent Muslims populations in the USA from exceeding the stage which Dr. Peter Hammond's studies indicate are the beginning stages of problems in the host countries.

Articles: The Five Stages of Islam

As long as we are able to keep Muslim populations here to less than the Stage Two level the Muslims in America should, if the pattern holds true, be calm and good neighbors and as we all like to believe them to be.

They won't pose much of a problem to us, nor we to them.

If their numbers grow larger than that we will make the same mistake the Europeans already have, to their regret.

We must take action now to prevent the storm .
 
Now you classify me as a traitor to my country.
Did you ever serve your country in a capacity where you willingly accept unlimited liability?

What are you doing in a thread directed at Americans?

:cool:
 
This is an international board. Your peculiar take on reality is on view to the world.
 
I know - I was just being facetious. The conservatives' Islamophobia just makes me want to get into their faces and scream about their ignorance and rank hypocrisy. Personally, I felt a heck of a lot safer walking down the street in Dubai than I do in downtown Seattle...and Seattle's a fairly safe city, as far as America goes....

It doesn't matter how loud you scream behind your keyboard, I still won't hear you.
 
I know - I was just being facetious. The conservatives' Islamophobia just makes me want to get into their faces and scream about their ignorance and rank hypocrisy. Personally, I felt a heck of a lot safer walking down the street in Dubai than I do in downtown Seattle...and Seattle's a fairly safe city, as far as America goes....

Some take well to 3rd class citizenship.

I don't suppose you value equality, do you?

Neither does Islam.

Lest us return to the issue of equality.

The idea is unacceptable to Islam.

For the non-believer cannot be the equal of the believer.

Even among the believers only those who subscribe to the three so-called Abrahamic religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam ( Ahl el-Kitab) are regarded as fully human.

Here is the hierarchy of human worth in Islam:

At the summit are free male Muslims

Next come Muslim male slaves

Then come free Muslim women

Next come Muslim slave women.

Then come free Jewish and /or Christian men

Then come slave Jewish and/or Christian men

Then come slave Jewish and/or Christian women.

Each category has rights that must be respected.

The People of the Book have always been protected and relatively well-treated by Muslim rulers, but often in the context of a form of apartheid known as dhimmitude.

The status of the rest of humanity, those whose faiths are not recognised by Islam or who have no faith at all, has never been spelled out although wherever Muslim rulers faced such communities they often treated them with a certain measure of tolerance and respect ( As in the case of Hindus under the Muslim dynasties of India.)

Non-Muslims can, and have often been, treated with decency, but never as equals.

(There is a hierarchy even for animals and plants. Seven animals and seven plants will assuredly go to heaven while seven others of each will end up in Hell.)

Amir Taheri: "Islam Is Incompatible With Democracy"

And you must also know that the messy part of Islamization is at the beginning.

After the fighting is done and Islamic rule is imposed things are pretty tranquil.

From what I hear.



Every Religion is Better
Jun 3 2015 | by Bill Warner

Every religion is better than Islam, and so is atheism. Here are three reasons:

1. All religions, except Islam, have the Golden Rule as an ethical cornerstone. Instead Islam has a dualistic ethical code.

2. In Islam, the Sharia demands that all humanity submit to Islamic customs and law.

3. The only religion that can kill apostates is Islam. Leaving Islam is a capital crime under the Sharia.

Some say that all religions are the same. But, from these reasons, we can see that Islam is inferior to all others.

Every Religion is Better - Political Islam
 
I'm bemused by the allusion to oil as America's version of "Crack" cocaine.

As though oil was unnecessary for life or that it is a bad thing.

We need it like we need nothing else save, food, water, air and protection from natural hazards.

Without oil we would be plunged into darkness and forced to try to exist in a pre-1860 lifestyle which our adversaries, who are sworn to defeat us, currently thrive.

We would be novices and at their mercy, were it ever to come to that.

And that is what they are planning for us in the US, to take away our technological advantages and leave us to try to exist on that level.

They would have the advantage then.

But about your post.

We are on our way to producing more oil than any other nation on Earth, what with new reserves having been discovered in the USA and the use of fracking techniques.

And for a long time now our consumption has primarily been supplied by NON Middle Eastern sources. We get only a fraction of our needs from the M.E.

However, our TRADING PARTNERS absolutely depend on an undisturbed flow of oil from the Gulf region.

And THAT is just ONE of the very, very, very good reasons for the invasion. We were able to guarantee our trading partners around the globe, an uninterrupted supply of oil and that kept US in business and able to live life as we know it and like it.

And while were in the neighborhood of alternative fuel, I saw a Toyota online ad which made me laugh contemptuously at their trying to see how many shum dits would get excited about their Hydrogen Fuel research.

It is amazing the nerve they have!

Hydrogen takes more energy to produce than it delivers in the final end product.

That's like getting excited at a machine which delivers an never ending supply of one dollar bills as long as you keep feeding it five dollar bills.

Yay?

:screwy

bemused by the allusion to oil as America's version of "Crack" cocaine.

As though oil was unnecessary for life or that it is a bad thing.

We need it like we need nothing else save, food, water, air and protection from natural hazards
.

I cannot fault people for being unaware but we don't need oil to the extent we are dependent on it. That's like saying we need "health INSURANCE." People who think this, including the Pesident, are so stuck how we've always done it, they cannot imagine it possible for it to be done any other way. We don't need health insurance, we need access to medical services and treatment. In my opinion, the fewer middle men as possible taking their cut and jacking up the costs, the better. Likewise, we don't need anywhere near as much oil as we use, although it's dishonest to say we don't need any oil. What we need is transportation. Transportation WITHOUT oil is possible and viable. What's even more exciting is the more we use the technology at its present levels of development; the cell phone, PC, hdtv, etc., have shown us, the more advanced and less expensive the technology becomes. Ignoring what we have now, refusing to use it while we "wait for it to catch up" means it will never catch up because there's nothing driving (free pun) advancements or driving down costs.

That said, right now people can get a brand new plug-in electric car. That' seats 5, gets a 100 mile range between charges at night, gets a top speed of 80 mph, needs hardly no maintance, uses the equalvalent of about $1 a gallon in gas seen in a slightly higher electric bill and uses no gasoline whatsoever for $200.00 a month.

Another thing people generally are oblivious to is there have been concerted efforts over almost a half a century to squash any competition to oil as the monopoly transportation energy by those with vested interests in the status quo.

I'll be the first to say we will continue to need oil for aviation, plastics, pharmaceuticals, fertilizer, etc. We do not NEED oil for personal transportation and the more we use plug-in electric cars, the better, bigger, faster and cheaper they will get. And nobody will be forced to finance Isis and middle eastern nuclear poliferation.
 
Kafir. Apologist Muslim or Kafir. Lying Jihadist.

You tell us.

Matters not what I tell you, you are of a single mind.
Muslims are the enemy not some, but each and everyone.
 
What are you doing in a thread directed at Americans?

:cool:

I suggest that you take that up with the Mods and who ever owns the Site.
Are non Americans now restricted on this board? Nope.
 
bemused by the allusion to oil as America's version of "Crack" cocaine.

As though oil was unnecessary for life or that it is a bad thing.

We need it like we need nothing else save, food, water, air and protection from natural hazards
.

I cannot fault people for being unaware but we don't need oil to the extent we are dependent on it. That's like saying we need "health INSURANCE." People who think this, including the Pesident, are so stuck how we've always done it, they cannot imagine it possible for it to be done any other way. We don't need health insurance, we need access to medical services and treatment. In my opinion, the fewer middle men as possible taking their cut and jacking up the costs, the better. Likewise, we don't need anywhere near as much oil as we use, although it's dishonest to say we don't need any oil. What we need is transportation. Transportation WITHOUT oil is possible and viable. What's even more exciting is the more we use the technology at its present levels of development; the cell phone, PC, hdtv, etc., have shown us, the more advanced and less expensive the technology becomes. Ignoring what we have now, refusing to use it while we "wait for it to catch up" means it will never catch up because there's nothing driving (free pun) advancements or driving down costs.

That said, right now people can get a brand new plug-in electric car. That' seats 5, gets a 100 mile range between charges at night, gets a top speed of 80 mph, needs hardly no maintance, uses the equalvalent of about $1 a gallon in gas seen in a slightly higher electric bill and uses no gasoline whatsoever for $200.00 a month.

Another thing people generally are oblivious to is there have been concerted efforts over almost a half a century to squash any competition to oil as the monopoly transportation energy by those with vested interests in the status quo.

I'll be the first to say we will continue to need oil for aviation, plastics, pharmaceuticals, fertilizer, etc. We do not NEED oil for personal transportation and the more we use plug-in electric cars, the better, bigger, faster and cheaper they will get. And nobody will be forced to finance Isis and middle eastern nuclear poliferation.

Look around you and list one thing that is not produced, made to operate, is kept preserved/stored, or is brought to you without the use of oil.

One thing.

The electric car, for example is made in a factory which runs on...

And uses materials made from...

And the materials are brought to the factory care of...

And delivered to your showroom because of...

And the electricity it uses is produced by...

And the electric motors that power the electricity production would stop if not for...

And the commercial transportation of goods can't be done yet without oil.

Oil will continue to be the developing and developed world's life blood.

While that remains so, we, as you say, must develop alternative sources and make them cheaper and more abundant and convenient.

But in the mean time...

EDIT: Oh, and anyone who tries to bring up Hydrogen, just tell them it costs more to produce/refine than it delivers in savings. That will stop them in their tracks.
 
Last edited:
Look around you and list one thing that is not produced, made to operate, is kept preserved/stored, or is brought to you without the use of oil.

One thing.

The elcetric car, for example is made in a factory which runs on...

And uses materials made from...

And the materials are brought to the factory care of...

And delivered to your showroom because of...

And the electricity it uses is produced by...

And the electric motors that power the electricity production would stop if not for...

And the commercial transportation of goods can't be done yet without oil.

Oil will continue to be the developing and developed world's life blood.

While that remains so, we, as you say, must develop alternative sources and make them cheaper and more abundant and convenient.

But in the mean time...

Wow, first completely rational post I've seen from you. Well done.
 
I suggest that you take that up with the Mods and who ever owns the Site.
Are non Americans now restricted on this board? Nope.

Just wanted to make the point.
 
Matters not what I tell you, you are of a single mind.
Muslims are the enemy not some, but each and everyone.

Each one subscribes to the teachings and edicts of Islam.

Yes?

Each one is bound by religious edict to perform Jihad.

Yes?

Each act of Jihad is ultimately designed to achieve global mastery and eliminate Kafirs.

Yes?

What am I missing?

That not all Muslims follow Islamic doctrine 'religiously?'

Okay.

Who doesn't?

Or better than asking you to tell us who doesn't, just give us a way to discern those we can trust.

That shouldn't be too difficult, right?
 
Each one subscribes to the teachings and edicts of Islam.

Yes?

Each one is bound by religious edict to perform Jihad.

Yes?

Each act of Jihad is ultimately designed to achieve global mastery and eliminate Kafirs.

Yes?

What am I missing?

That not all Muslims follow Islamic doctrine 'religiously?'

Okay.

Who doesn't?

Or better than asking you to tell us who doesn't, just give us a way to discern those we can trust.

That shouldn't be too difficult, right?

Oh you are missing a lot.
What would you do with Muslims in the US? NA - EU?
You may or may not have addressed that. Not sure
 
Back
Top Bottom