• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Was I wrong?

Was I wrong to ask her to stop?

  • Yes

    Votes: 2 4.4%
  • No

    Votes: 43 95.6%

  • Total voters
    45
I've had one problem like this over the years. I didn't get that sangha was calling me the bad guy, but I could not win this fight. Priority is having a fun baseball season where these kids leave knowing how to catch and throw. Which at 4-5 years old is really hard for them to do. I could give up, pass the kids and problems to the next parent on the team and keep some pride. Or swallow my pride and do what is best for all. I don't want to be let go for perceived bigotry, the city doesn't want to deal with this type of thing, and the kids deserve a good coach (little ego there). The other parents don't have a problem with me. Just one. And the city cannot tell a woman to kick rocks who complained that a coach was intolerant of her sexuality. The winner is this isn't really this woman, it will be these kids and want to be there to be sure it does. I'll be able to better protect myself if a future incident occurs.


Just to add, I do appreciate what you are saying, and I did get kicked last night, but after calming down I don't think the city had a choice.

Of course not. I was talking about the adminstrations' POV.

As I said, you can be right, or you cann be smart. For some people, protecting their rightousness is the most important thing.

The rest of us live in the real world.
 
In the end, I was asked to apologize and promise to be more attentive of the sensitive issue. Which it took everything in me to do. It really did. She also got a refund and her child will be playing for free, and also will be allowed to play basketball for free when that starts. Her child is back on my team, and she is going to be my assistant coach to ensure he child gets fair playing time. Which I don't get since all children play the field, there are no reserves.

:lamo , if it went like you said it sounds more like a case of misunderstandings and such, so laughing as the City's reaction is so stupid.

Apology? Seemed alright, more to appease just to make her not get any more upset. The rest seems to be overacted or playing into an overreaction. If you explained everything, as explained here, I'd think anyone would realize that it was, well like I said, a misunderstanding. You weren't bothered by her sexuality and didn't mean to ignore the spouse, you also just didn't want to get a spiel on it (as you didn't really care). Using gay instead of lesbian or homosexual or w.e. can be dealt with by apology and something about didn't realize how it could be taken etc. etc. (or something to that effect). Seems an honest mistake considering how often same sex marriage and gay marriage are interchanged.

Don't get why she has to be an assistant coach, considering it's established enough she'd complain if her child didn't get fair playing time. Also sets a bad president of "complain to get coaching jobs (even if they are voluntary)." Plus, if her worry is her child being discriminated against by other parents, isn't that going to be more likely now she is assistant coach then before? *shrugs*

Get the feeling she went into the original situation believing (rightly or wrongly) that people/society will be unwelcoming because of her sexual orientation. So all your actions got viewed through that, and thus looked more malicious then intended to be.
 
The nomenclature keeps changing. When I was younger gay women were either 'gay' or 'lesbian'. It didn't matter which one, and nobody cared which one. Now they're just 'lesbian', and anything else is a social faux pas.

Gay men, however, are still 'gay'.

I am going to have to write this down. Thanks
 
I've had one problem like this over the years. I didn't get that sangha was calling me the bad guy, but I could not win this fight. Priority is having a fun baseball season where these kids leave knowing how to catch and throw. Which at 4-5 years old is really hard for them to do. I could give up, pass the kids and problems to the next parent on the team and keep some pride. Or swallow my pride and do what is best for all. I don't want to be let go for perceived bigotry, the city doesn't want to deal with this type of thing, and the kids deserve a good coach (little ego there). The other parents don't have a problem with me. Just one. And the city cannot tell a woman to kick rocks who complained that a coach was intolerant of her sexuality. The winner is this isn't really this woman, it will be these kids and want to be there to be sure it does. I'll be able to better protect myself if a future incident occurs.

Just to add, I do appreciate what you are saying, and I did get kicked last night, but after calming down I don't think the city had a choice.

With all that said, revenge is a dish best served cold.
 
I dont disagree, but I am worried that this is going to turn into something that gets me pulled from coaching while they look into or whatever they do. Especially since i have to meet with the city's hr rep. Its bothering the **** out of me since i got the call.

What you should do is turn this into the cities fault for not properly training you to handle situations like this and as a coach just trying to do your job shouldnt have to be caught unprepared. The city needs to immediately give you an assistant that is familiar with same sex parents and the special needs and concerns that they obviously need. The city dropped the ball and demonstrated their lack of concern and insensitivity to this wonderful same sex couple and now you are considering filing a lawsuit for potential damages to your coaching career. You will contact CNN to talk about your concerns about what happened and to raise awareness of the threat to society by not preparing coaches to incorporate same sex couples that are just trying to parent and give their children the same opportunities like the rest of us.
 
No. We live in a really rural area and New Zealand is not funded half as well as the USA is for sports. I generally keep time myself but just forgot that time...

Yeah that's true. Here in the states, all sorts of programs get cut - mostly music and the arts - to fund the sports programs. Get a winning team and it gets even worse.
 
Of course not. I was talking about the adminstrations' POV.

As I said, you can be right, or you cann be smart. For some people, protecting their rightousness is the most important thing.

The rest of us live in the real world.

It is smart to make sure this woman can't spoil anyone else's fun. She is a problem parent. Not because of her sexuality, but her interruptions of practice.
 
Yeah that's true. Here in the states, all sorts of programs get cut - mostly music and the arts - to fund the sports programs. Get a winning team and it gets even worse.

Athletics aren't important? I hear this a lot. So I am just curious. Are athletics less important than the arts?
 
And losing his coaching job would make it impossible for him to do that

He was clearly in the wrong at every turn. He apologized so clearly that is the case. You're just happy he mollified some people on the political left, quite frankly. Had it been some Christian parent upset about something, you'd have a completely different take. Well, I'm sure he'll roll over every single time now, which is your advice to him not surprisingly. Certainly wouldn't want him standing up for himself. That would make him the bad guy in the wrong.
 
Of course not. I was talking about the adminstrations' POV.

As I said, you can be right, or you cann be smart. For some people, protecting their rightousness is the most important thing.

The rest of us live in the real world.


Like I say, had this been about a Christian parent, you'd be posting something very different. You certainly wouldn't be saying what a great guy he is that he he tucked tail for the sake of getting along. What he's going to find is that people like you don't really have respect for him. You know he'll back down when pushed and you want to encourage that. Certainly you'd never back him up should ever decide not to apologize and walk on egg shells. Like I said, it's all hypothetical anyway. That'll never actually happen so you've trained him well.
 
I've had one problem like this over the years. I didn't get that sangha was calling me the bad guy, but I could not win this fight. Priority is having a fun baseball season where these kids leave knowing how to catch and throw. Which at 4-5 years old is really hard for them to do. I could give up, pass the kids and problems to the next parent on the team and keep some pride. Or swallow my pride and do what is best for all. I don't want to be let go for perceived bigotry, the city doesn't want to deal with this type of thing, and the kids deserve a good coach (little ego there). The other parents don't have a problem with me. Just one. And the city cannot tell a woman to kick rocks who complained that a coach was intolerant of her sexuality. The winner is this isn't really this woman, it will be these kids and want to be there to be sure it does. I'll be able to better protect myself if a future incident occurs.

Just to add, I do appreciate what you are saying, and I did get kicked last night, but after calming down I don't think the city had a choice.

The city had a choice. They can choose to enable and encourage bad behavior because it is easier for them, or not.

Part of children's teams sports is supposed to be the lesson that doing what is right is often hard. We expect our leaders to be able to understand the same.

What would be the reaction of the other parents if you get fired?
 
He was clearly in the wrong at every turn. He apologized so clearly that is the case. You're just happy he mollified some people on the political left, quite frankly. Had it been some Christian parent upset about something, you'd have a completely different take. Well, I'm sure he'll roll over every single time now, which is your advice to him not surprisingly. Certainly wouldn't want him standing up for himself. That would make him the bad guy in the wrong.

Like I say, had this been about a Christian parent, you'd be posting something very different. You certainly wouldn't be saying what a great guy he is that he he tucked tail for the sake of getting along. What he's going to find is that people like you don't really have respect for him. You know he'll back down when pushed and you want to encourage that. Certainly you'd never back him up should ever decide not to apologize and walk on egg shells. Like I said, it's all hypothetical anyway. That'll never actually happen so you've trained him well.



Your take is as perceptive as it usually is.
 
I coach for the city here where i live. Varying sports for ages 4-13 depending on where they need help coaching. For baseball this year one of my teams is a 4-5 year old t ball team. We had our first practice last night and two women came with a little girl. I introduced myself and said hi and they immediately went on a little speech about how they are together, they are lesbians, they are raising this girl together, nothing wrong with that. Then go into whats going to happen if I discriminate against their daughter because of their sexuality, threatening lawsuits and explaining that there are laws ect. I told them I was there to teach their daughter softball, and their sexual orientation was not a factor at all and moved along. As I am meeting other parents a few of them commented that this lady had approached them and gave them a similar speech out of nowhere. After all the kids were there I gathered the kids together and started off having the kids introduce themselves to their teammates. No additional information really, just kid would say my name is Earl. And everyone would say Hi Earl to start to learn teammates names. When the little girl told everyone her name, again the lady popped into action giving her speech to everyone out there. I stopped her after about a minute and spoke to her privately, or as privately as I could on a baseball field, and let her know that it is not appropriate to interrupt a team activity like that, and again told her noone is going to be discriminating against her daughter. So today I get a call from the city letting me know she filed a complaint and is taking her child off of my team because I told her she had to hide her sexuality at our practices so it wouldn't bother other parents. I dont recall my exact wording but it was not mean, the word hiding or even sexuality didnt come out of my mouth. I only asked her not to interrupt our practices and tried to assure he that I don't care what her sexual preference is, I am there to teach baseball and the other parents are only there to watch.

Was I wrong to ask her to stop what she was doing?

Of course not, if she is a dingbat then that is her problem. She already voiced her position numerous times (from what you said) and there was absolutely no need for her to repeat her speech when the training had started. Maybe you, as a coach, should institute rules that the parents have to adhere too when they have their kid playing with you:

1. do not interrupt the coach during the official practice
2. do not criticize the child or other children, only give positive re-enforcement
3. do not criticize the referee
4. no swearing, temper tantrums, assaulting or pestering other parents (not of our team or from the other team)
5. sport has to be fun, treat it like that
6. do not force your child to play against their wishes
7. be a positive influence, not a negative one
8. if you have an issue with the coach, please do not interrupt the training session but talk to the coach after the training session is over
9. don't be a dingbat ;)
 
Your take is as perceptive as it usually is.

You said it yourself, had he not apologized, you would have viewed him as being part of the problem. Anything short of being a willing scapegoat would have made him the bad guy in your eyes. Certainly, everyone else was in the right and the lady should never pause and look at her own actions.
 
The city had a choice. They can choose to enable and encourage bad behavior because it is easier for them, or not.

Part of children's teams sports is supposed to be the lesson that doing what is right is often hard. We expect our leaders to be able to understand the same.

What would be the reaction of the other parents if you get fired?

I think he taught the parents not to speak up on his behalf. I wouldn't after this knowing that he'll admit being at fault regardless of the circumstances.
 
And losing his coaching job would make it impossible for him to do that

He wouldn't lose it if he took notes and made sure he was prepared to deal with the woman.

I was in school with mostly white people. We had a black family came and the 3 boys were great athletes. Their mom pulled the race card and all that on the school. It got ridiculous. It didn't stop there though. When the school caved she started walking on the court in the middle of game to tell at refs.

Problem parents have to be treated like spoiled toddlers. If you give them an inch they will take a mile. Being proactive is important. You do that by taking notes and all that. But you also have to be mentally prepared. You have to know they will become a problem again.

And if the objective is for the kids to have a good time...that won't happen with a bitch trying to control everything.
 
He wouldn't lose it if he took notes and made sure he was prepared to deal with the woman.

I was in school with mostly white people. We had a black family came and the 3 boys were great athletes. Their mom pulled the race card and all that on the school. It got ridiculous. It didn't stop there though. When the school caved she started walking on the court in the middle of game to tell at refs.

Problem parents have to be treated like spoiled toddlers. If you give them an inch they will take a mile. Being proactive is important. You do that by taking notes and all that. But you also have to be mentally prepared. You have to know they will become a problem again.

And if the objective is for the kids to have a good time...that won't happen with a bitch trying to control everything.

The OP said that the lady didn't really "win" this but I guarantee you, she thinks she did. Now she's got an apology and an admission that he was the one in the wrong. This'll just encourage her.
 
Of course not. I was talking about the adminstrations' POV.

As I said, you can be right, or you cann be smart. For some people, protecting their rightousness is the most important thing.

The rest of us live in the real world.
It's not a matter of one being in the so-called "real world". It's a matter of the importance of a given issue to the individual. Even with the same person, they may stand on principle over one thing because that particular thing is important to them, but let another slide because that one is not.
 
The OP said that the lady didn't really "win" this but I guarantee you, she thinks she did. Now she's got an apology and an admission that he was the one in the wrong. This'll just encourage her.

Precisely. You don't discourage bad behavior by rewarding and validating it.
 
The OP said that the lady didn't really "win" this but I guarantee you, she thinks she did. Now she's got an apology and an admission that he was the one in the wrong. This'll just encourage her.
Bingo. She'll read it as a win. And she will be emboldened for the next time... and there will be a next time.
 
It's not a matter of one being in the so-called "real world". It's a matter of the importance of a given issue to the individual. Even with the same person, they may stand on principle over one thing because that particular thing is important to them, but let another slide because that one is not.

True. It's about priorities. Some people put their own rightousness first. Others look to see how they can do the most good.
 
Back
Top Bottom