- Joined
- Jul 2, 2014
- Messages
- 7,437
- Reaction score
- 1,950
- Location
- Confirmation Bias Land
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
He is a traitor and a criminal. George W could not have done nearly as much damage to the country without his help.
Disgusting.
Someone who would rather Dick Cheney be executed rather than Saddam Hussein.
In reply to clownboy --- You failed to answer my specific notes and attempt diversion by bringing up other points
Have fun playing in the clown car
Please explain to me why a war criminal does not deserve to be brought to justice, and possibly the ultimate justice. The ONLY reasonable complaint that any rational person could bring against my position is my advocation for the death penalty.
Disgusting.
Someone who would rather Dick Cheney be executed rather than Saddam Hussein.
Your mistaken idea of what constitutes a war criminal and displayed ignorance of how wars are prosecuted. By your take every war time general and leader ever, the whole of human history, is guilty of war crimes.
Slippery-slope argument. Welcome to the 21st century, where civilized people do not put up with the kind of **** that Dick Cheney instigated.
That's what some in the 20th century said about FDR. Meh, it's all about your mistaken ideas of warfare, in any century.
Your views are categorically rejected as being out-of-date and out-of-touch. You seem to have more concern about the reputation of one evil mastermind than the lives of over a hundred thousand slaughtered Iraqi men, women, and children.
Nope, I care not for Cheney's reputation. And ****can the Sally Struthers routine, your hypocrisy shows clearly. The only reason you aren't attacking FDR and Johnson with the same weepy regard is that you perceive they are on the same political side as your chosen bias.
:lamo
Cool story bro! :lamo You're the one defending the war criminal. You're the one deflecting. You're the one who chooses to believe that his reputation is more important than the lives of over 100,000 Iraqi civilians.
You think FDR or someone else should be a war criminal too? Fine, then start the thread and let's have the discussion. This is about Dick Cheney, pure and simple. Stay on topic.
Nope, not defending Cheney, just saying the actions you attack him for are the same actions other presidents and Veeps that YOU have defended have taken in the past. The SOLE difference is that Cheney is on the opposite side of the political fence from you.
So does that mean you and your like-minded brethren will stop mentioning Cheney after he's gone? Somehow I doubt that very much.FDR has been dead and buried for quite a while.
He didn't order anyone waterboarded in any case.
You lie. Stop defending Cheney and own up to the facts. Why is that so difficult for you?
FDR has been dead and buried for quite a while.
He didn't order anyone waterboarded in any case.
Dick Cheney deserves a noose around his neck for his architecture of multiple, egregious war crimes.
And just what were those "ends"?
I'm just glad that war criminal Dubya didn't die, because Cheney - with his "One Percent Doctrine" - would have had us in yet more wars. Both of them need to be standing trial at The Hague for what they did.