- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 51,710
- Reaction score
- 35,488
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Personally I don't. I think that Hobbes had it right when he intimated that the only 'natural right' that a human being possesses is the right to strive for their own survival. Everything else exists only at the sufferance of your own strength or the kindness of others
Eh, see...I don't see Hobbes notion as being inconsistent with the belief of Natural Rights.
I believe Human's have natural rights, IE that which they are free to do. A person by simply existing in this world can say what they want, go to where they want, believe what htey want, take what they want, etc. There is no inherent internal limit upon a person from doing those things.
However, it is simply a natural right to have the capacity to do those things. There is no natural right to have your rights protected nor respected by anyone else. Engaging in your rights either requires that it does not conflict with anyone else OR, if it does, that either you are stronger in some fashion and thus can force your will upon them OR they are benevolent and allow you to do it.
Forming society simply codifies the protections related to some rights; it forms a social agreement of where individuals will benevolently allow your rights to be acted upon and where they will join together to stop them from occuring.
I definitely believe in Natural Rights, and believe them to be a significantly different thing than Societal Rights.