• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

For or against the Trans-Pacific Trade Agreement?

For or against the Trans-Pacific Trade Agreement/.


  • Total voters
    55
I support the principle; that's enough. Draft treaties are always confidential; that helps all negotiators. Were you unaware of that?

Well that's not enough. Of course it's done in secret. But legislators, if they'd get off there asses and go to the basement, they might find things they don't like, as Elizabeth Warren has. Though it's (apparently intentionally) no easy task.
 
Supported by the knowledgeable, opposed by the ignorant.

Got a broad enough brush in your hand Jack. How utterly arrogant and condescending of you. That post is worth one S&H green stamp.
 
Well that's not enough. Of course it's done in secret. But legislators, if they'd get off there asses and go to the basement, they might find things they don't like, as Elizabeth Warren has. Though it's (apparently intentionally) no easy task.

The arrangements are no more onerous than the modern norm, and are much more generous than in the past, when there was no access at all.
 
Got a broad enough brush in your hand Jack. How utterly arrogant and condescending of you. That post is worth one S&H green stamp.

Opposition to free trade is knownothingism. It merits every ounce of arrogance and condescension I can muster. If I could get more I would bring that too.
 
Opposition to free trade is knownothingism. It merits every ounce of arrogance and condescension I can muster. If I could get more I would bring that too.

Boxing up the Church's that oppose this along with the many environmental advocacy groups, the labor unions and the majority of the Democratic Party as ignorant and know nothings is more of an indication that you are the one short on knowledge, but more importantly, a worthless debtor and complete waste of time. As far as I'm concerned, there's no value whatsoever to such an arrogant assertion. And supporting something so feverishly that you don't know dick about, is beyond all reason.
 
Boxing up the Church's that oppose this along with the many environmental advocacy groups, the labor unions and the majority of the Democratic Party as ignorant and know nothings is more of an indication that you are the one short on knowledge, but more importantly, a worthless debtor and complete waste of time. As far as I'm concerned, there's no value whatsoever to such an arrogant assertion. And supporting something so feverishly that you don't know dick about, is beyond all reason.

You are correct that ignorance is increasingly widespread. As an educated man, it is my duty to oppose that.
 
Back
Top Bottom