• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Has the US Worsened the Spread of Radical Islam?

Has the US Worsened the Spread of Radical Islam?


  • Total voters
    38
Islam IS radical by just about any western measurement imaginable. It micromanages people's lives down to the iota, it discourages freedom of thought, it is archly misogynistic and it seeks to destroy all systems of humanist thought. What we are calling "radical Islam here is merely those who are EXTRA radical and the only difference between the radicals and the mainstream happens to lie in the methods employed by way of spreading the ideology. What we refer to as "moderate" Islam is still extremely conservative by our standards, and it is only a small percentage of Muslims who are truly liberal (such as in Turkey).

Now, we have certainly facilitated the spread of "radical" Islam by removing the strong-armed leaders that kept it in check, but let's not fool ourselves here -- the radical elements of Islam are built upon a foundation laid down by Islam, and an enormous number of Muslims share the same value systems as the radicals, even if they fall short in supporting the methods.

Besides ideology, one of he chief impediment to liberalizing the Middle east is their family structure. In one province of Syria from which a good many refugees originate, 70 percent of the population is married to their own family members. Men marry their brother's daughters and arrange marriages between their sons and their brother's daughters. The Hatfields and McCoys look downright modern in comparison, and cultures this inbred and this clannish make the acceptance of democratic, humanist principles impossible.

So, yes, we contributed, but what is occurring is primarily a product of culture, make no mistake.
 
Last edited:
How so? Was there any indication that the Soviets could of spread their influence past the status quo?
I stated if the US was not there, the Soviets would have been. Nature of the world during that time
 
Back
Top Bottom