• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would you support the right of Texas to secede?

Would you support the decision of Texas to peacefully and democratically secede, if voted upon


  • Total voters
    133
Sorry you are so completely wrong in claiming I'm wrong. With enough time I could take a portion of your property.

sorry guy you have no understanding of rights, law adheres to natural rights, natural rights do not adhere to law.

positive law has power over civil rights/ legal rights, but not natural rights.

"All positive and civil laws should conform, as far as possible, to the law of natural reason and equity"
 
sorry guy you have no understanding of rights, law adheres to natural rights, natural rights do not adhere to law.

positive law has power over civil rights/ legal rights, but not natural rights.

You are hilarious - seriously:)

I do wished I had the time to yank a slice of your property right out you
 
You are hilarious - seriously:)

I do wished I had the time to yank a slice of your property right out you

please stop with the non sense.

people can get legal rights to things, on the property of other people this is fact, but it is through already arranged agreement, stop acting as if you can walk up and take property because it is your will....
 
There is a road that is adjacent to my property that goes to a portion of a river that I live on for 25 years. I have used the road for so long to get to an area of the river someone else owns. And I've not been denied access - nor has it ever been gated - and I've actually improved it. So now the owner can't prevent me from using it - or anybody that I give permission to use it.

I haven't been able to find a statute that corroborates that argument... so i'm not sure of it's true or not. <shrug>
 
I haven't been able to find a statute that corroborates that argument... so i'm not sure of it's true or not. <shrug>

these kind of things are true however its not a natural right its a legal right....it falls under laws that deals with access to water ways.

but this has nothing to do with anything to the augrment that a person has a natural right to the property of another person....this is a deflection
 
Last edited:
these kind of things are true however its not a natural right its a legal right....it falls under laws that deals with access to water ways.

but this has nothing to do with anything to the augrment that a person has a natural right to the property of another person....this is a deflection

Natural rights? Who cares about those fairy tales? This is statutory law. On the planet earth. You know the planet in the parallel universe to your own.
 
please stop with the non sense.

people can get legal rights to things, on the property of other people this is fact, but it is through already arranged agreement, stop acting as if you can walk up and take property because it is your will....

Look...I've been to court over Estopple law. I usurped my neighbor's property...legally. Snooze ya lose.
 
Natural rights? Who cares about those fairy tales? This is statutory law. On the planet earth. You know the planet in the parallel universe to your own.

then why did you address me then?..since thats what i was talking about to another poster......you must be lost.

next time know who you are addressing.
 
Look...I've been to court over Estopple law. I usurped my neighbor's property...legally. Snooze ya lose.

i got news for you...i was not talking about natural rights not cases of law...don't act as if you can walk up and take property because you just want it.



u·surp
yo͞oˈsərp/Submit
verb
past tense: usurped; past participle: usurped
take (a position of power or importance) illegally or by force.
"Richard usurped the throne"
synonyms: seize, take over, take possession of, take, commandeer, wrest, assume, expropriate
"Richard usurped the throne"
take the place of (someone in a position of power) illegally: supplant.
"the Hanoverian dynasty had usurped the Stuarts"
synonyms: oust, overthrow, remove, topple, unseat, depose, dethrone; More
archaic
encroach or infringe upon (someone's rights).
"the Church had usurped upon the domain of the state"
 
i got news for you...i was not talking about natural rights not cases of law...don't act as if you can walk up and take property because you just want it.



u·surp
yo͞oˈsərp/Submit
verb
past tense: usurped; past participle: usurped
take (a position of power or importance) illegally or by force.
"Richard usurped the throne"
synonyms: seize, take over, take possession of, take, commandeer, wrest, assume, expropriate
"Richard usurped the throne"
take the place of (someone in a position of power) illegally: supplant.
"the Hanoverian dynasty had usurped the Stuarts"
synonyms: oust, overthrow, remove, topple, unseat, depose, dethrone; More
archaic
encroach or infringe upon (someone's rights).
"the Church had usurped upon the domain of the state"

Ha! Yeah....took it over like the Alamo.
 
then why did you address me then?..since thats what i was talking about to another poster......you must be lost.

next time know who you are addressing.

Yeah, but you're wrong. I can use another person's property...and not only use it, but claim it as my own...and they can't get it back even in a lawsuit.
 
Ha! Yeah....took it over like the Alamo.

:doh......why it is every time you speak to me on subjects, you are lost?

your conversation had nothing to do with mind in the first place, yet you tried to create a point with me and failed.
 
:doh......why it is every time you speak to me on subjects, you are lost?

your conversation had nothing to do with mind in the first place, yet you tried to create a point with me and failed.

It's just my NATURE! :lamo
 
Yeah, but you're wrong. I can use another person's property...and not only use it, but claim it as my own...and they can't get it back even in a lawsuit.

fail....this has nothing to do with what i was talking about with blarg, which you inserted yourself..
 
If you have a natural right to food, water, and shelter, and can't provide them for yourself, does that mean that someone else has a natural obligation to provide them for you?
Without recognizing the basic needs of survival a government could control the citizens by their bellies. Having a right to life covers basic survival needs. Turning that need into partisan hackery is dishonest. Certainly you wouldnt want to be barred from eating or from anything that will kill you. There is plenty of food to go around in the US that no one should starve. Your rights end where anothers would be harmed if you asserted your right. Claiming that someone worked producing a food product does not give anyone the right to tell a child that they are going to starve to death because someone else had a job and they dont want to be forced to give anything to anyone. Where could such people lead us?

Holodomor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Back
Top Bottom