- Joined
- Oct 22, 2012
- Messages
- 32,516
- Reaction score
- 5,321
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
i do, and have for 25 years. All i can say is: "thank you estopple laws". :applaud
sorry wrong...
i do, and have for 25 years. All i can say is: "thank you estopple laws". :applaud
that nonsense post makes no sense to the post of mine you reproduced as the lead to it.
sorry wrong...
Sorry you are so completely wrong in claiming I'm wrong. With enough time I could take a portion of your property.
sorry guy you have no understanding of rights, law adheres to natural rights, natural rights do not adhere to law.
positive law has power over civil rights/ legal rights, but not natural rights.
You are hilarious - seriously
I do wished I had the time to yank a slice of your property right out you
There is a road that is adjacent to my property that goes to a portion of a river that I live on for 25 years. I have used the road for so long to get to an area of the river someone else owns. And I've not been denied access - nor has it ever been gated - and I've actually improved it. So now the owner can't prevent me from using it - or anybody that I give permission to use it.
Sorry you are so completely wrong in claiming I'm wrong. With enough time I could take a portion of your property.
I haven't been able to find a statute that corroborates that argument... so i'm not sure of it's true or not. <shrug>
I haven't been able to find a statute that corroborates that argument... so i'm not sure of it's true or not. <shrug>
these kind of things are true however its not a natural right its a legal right....it falls under laws that deals with access to water ways.
but this has nothing to do with anything to the augrment that a person has a natural right to the property of another person....this is a deflection
adverse possession?
please stop with the non sense.
people can get legal rights to things, on the property of other people this is fact, but it is through already arranged agreement, stop acting as if you can walk up and take property because it is your will....
Thrilla, it's late, just got in from the Airport in Austin, but I'll get you some information tomorrow.
oh?...tell me do you believe you have a right to property which does not belong to you?
Natural rights? Who cares about those fairy tales? This is statutory law. On the planet earth. You know the planet in the parallel universe to your own.
if I do will nature lodge a complaint or will you?
Look...I've been to court over Estopple law. I usurped my neighbor's property...legally. Snooze ya lose.
i got news for you...i was not talking about natural rights not cases of law...don't act as if you can walk up and take property because you just want it.
u·surp
yo͞oˈsərp/Submit
verb
past tense: usurped; past participle: usurped
take (a position of power or importance) illegally or by force.
"Richard usurped the throne"
synonyms: seize, take over, take possession of, take, commandeer, wrest, assume, expropriate
"Richard usurped the throne"
take the place of (someone in a position of power) illegally: supplant.
"the Hanoverian dynasty had usurped the Stuarts"
synonyms: oust, overthrow, remove, topple, unseat, depose, dethrone; More
archaic
encroach or infringe upon (someone's rights).
"the Church had usurped upon the domain of the state"
then why did you address me then?..since thats what i was talking about to another poster......you must be lost.
next time know who you are addressing.
Ha! Yeah....took it over like the Alamo.
:doh......why it is every time you speak to me on subjects, you are lost?
your conversation had nothing to do with mind in the first place, yet you tried to create a point with me and failed.
Yeah, but you're wrong. I can use another person's property...and not only use it, but claim it as my own...and they can't get it back even in a lawsuit.
Without recognizing the basic needs of survival a government could control the citizens by their bellies. Having a right to life covers basic survival needs. Turning that need into partisan hackery is dishonest. Certainly you wouldnt want to be barred from eating or from anything that will kill you. There is plenty of food to go around in the US that no one should starve. Your rights end where anothers would be harmed if you asserted your right. Claiming that someone worked producing a food product does not give anyone the right to tell a child that they are going to starve to death because someone else had a job and they dont want to be forced to give anything to anyone. Where could such people lead us?If you have a natural right to food, water, and shelter, and can't provide them for yourself, does that mean that someone else has a natural obligation to provide them for you?
It's just my NATURE! :lamo