Well then you really have no ****ing clue what you are talking about. Kid.I'm not married. I've never had sex.
Well then you really have no ****ing clue what you are talking about. Kid.I'm not married. I've never had sex.
Well then you really have no ****ing clue what you are talking about. Kid.
Are you referring to an openly gay couple?
Oh ... ick.
I'm in favor of all sexual activity outside marriage, as well as any within marriage which involves force, contraception, or sodomy being outlawed.
I think the appropriate penalty would vary depending on the heinousness of the act. Incest, sodomy, rape, and adultery should probably carry a maximum penalty of death. While seduction and simple fornication should probably be punished with lighter penalties.
I'm not married. I've never had sex.
Well you just said that 'openly gay' means sex acts in public. And I said that neither straight nor gay couples participate in sexual acts in public, so your 'openly gay' argument is quite circular....is that intentional? Do you just have no answer?
But there are folks (male and female including sodomy) that like doing these things to people who enjoy them being done to them, and it doesn't hurt anyone not involved and only hurts those involved if they've chosen to be hurt.... what's your beef?
No, I said that holding hands isn't a sex act.
It is harmful to society for sodomy to be legal.
And you also said that to be openly gay there had to be visible sex acts. So....when do you see gay or straight couples engaging publicly in sex acts?
Again, no one's fooled here by your circular argument. Can you support your belief or not?
How so?
I didn't say that.
Holding hands would not be illegal. And you know what openly homosexual means.
Holding hands is not a sex act.
LOL When do you ever see straight couples or gays committing 'sex acts' in public? (being "openly gay or straight" as you define it)
This is ludicrous but entertaining.
No, I said that holding hands isn't a sex act.
It is harmful to society for sodomy to be legal.
Well here's what ya did say and you have not clarified what 'openly gay' means or what 'sex acts' are evidence of that. And if they are *openly* gay then those sex acts must be public.
Now...care to actually prove you have any support for your belief or not?
It is harmful to society for sodomy to be legal.
How so?
Because, it creates the impression that society approves of it (usually not incorrect). Even if it's difficult to prosecute, having a law against it demonstrates society's rejection of the practice.
You know what "openly gay" means.
If it does no harm, why cant society approve of it?
Dude, another circular argument? This is a riot! Is there only quick sand beneath your beliefs? Sure seems like it, since you bob and weave like a shoelace in the wind.
It harms the people who do it.
Moderator's Warning: |
Stop the derailing about sodomy and such and return to the thread topic. |
The OP is a demonstration of religious extremism translated (an attempt) into law.
Any insights & explanations into the thought processes behind this should be considered on-topic.
Just a general opinion, posted as a return to the thread topic.
What does that have to do with anything?
You think that being gay is evil as in morally bad, right? Not as in Hitler evil?
Who would you rather have be your leader... a gay person or Hitler?
Ad hominem.
There isnt any attack on you kid. Just face the fact that virgins can never be authorities on sex. As a virgin you just have no clue what is perverted in any real sense when it comes to sexual intercourse. Of course you should be able to spot a few real perversions like sexual misconduct because there are laws forbidding certain activities. But when it comes to consenting adults in privacy the government cannot have any ability to ban such liberties. If consenting adults want to **** and pee on each other, while I find that to be very disgusting and wouldnt advocate such behavior, they are adults and if thats what they chose to do, I am not in any position to object nor is the government. The rational is that opinions do not dictate liberties and freedoms. If opinions held such powers then the American people would have tore up the Constitution a long time a go.
In a free society, neither you nor the govt should have any right to tell others what to do in the bedroom any more than they should have the right to tell you how to cut your hair.
That is the realm of dictatorships.
I have to disagree with the start of your post. You need not have had sex to have an opinion on it. He is however unaware of what he is missing out on.
I have never had homosexual sex nor have I peed or ******* on anyone or vice versa. Just not appealing to me.
However I agree that if someone wants to engage in these activities then they have every right to as long as it is between consenting adults. Neither I nor the govt has anything to do with it.