soot
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2013
- Messages
- 4,308
- Reaction score
- 2,530
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I voted no because the idea, on it's face, is ****tarded.
If a gun manufacturer can't be sued (Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act) when a purchaser uses a gun to commit a crime (a protection I support, by the way), I see no reason why or how that can be turned around where a manufacturer could sue a purchaser for using the product in a manner inconsistent with the manufacturer's wishes or values.
If a gun manufacturer can't be sued (Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act) when a purchaser uses a gun to commit a crime (a protection I support, by the way), I see no reason why or how that can be turned around where a manufacturer could sue a purchaser for using the product in a manner inconsistent with the manufacturer's wishes or values.