That is what YOU said, not me. What I am saying is that IF that is true, then we should observe that taking away the womans's ovaries would result in her no longer being a woman anymore. And since that is not the case, your position is flawed. It is not circular reasoning. That is taking your reasoning and demonstrating its glaring flaw. Again what you have done is demonstrate to the discerning eye that your mind is creating a distortion in the form of inventing an instance of circular reasoning when none exists. There is a motivation for this. While I cannot say exactly what it is, I would guess that it is coming from something that is making you uncomfortable with transwomen.A woman has ovaries, a man has testicles, there is no more to being a man or woman than that.