• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Addendum to RFRA - should a prostitute be forced to have sex with whites?[W:118]

Should the State force Sally to be ****'d by white men?


  • Total voters
    15
Re: Addendum to RFRA - should a prostitute be forced to have sex with whites?

Conservative Christian, Evangelical Christian, Whatever Christian. You are being spectacularly defensive, something that conservative Christians are well-known for. So whatever expedient title of the type of Christian you wish to claim to be cannot cover up your defensiveness. And you know what? Of all the religions whose followers I have engaged in debate--which, specifically, are Judaism, Christianity, and Islam--Christians are by far the most defensive of these three. It's not even close. Jews and Muslims are SOOOO much better than you guys in this regard. I wonder why that is, Thrilla?
I'm being "spectacularly defensive"?... :lamo... dude, i'm not even upset at your bigotry and i'm providing simple easy answers to your ongoing attacks.

and i really don't care about your opinion over who is more or less defensive among the different religions... it means absolutely nothing to anybody who isn't you.

Go back and reread my accusation of your lack of faith. I stand by what I said and refuse to apologize for it. It needs no clarification. You just didn't like it because it is true and because you are defensive.
let me guess...you're a teenager, right?

you saying it's true means nothing.. you have absolutely zero standing to measure or judge anyone elses faith... period, end of story.

of course i don't expect you to apologize... it takes integrity to apologize for bigotry and dumb arguments based on bigotry.

I don't like your argument because it's bull****... you are making positive claims based on the unknowable.

btw, it's not the christian in me that has a problem with your arguments, it's the intellectual in me that does.... dumb arguments are dumb.


By the way. How do you feel about the steady decline in church membership in America over the last few decades?
I don't feel anything about it.... other peoples religious beliefs or habits are none of my business.
 
Re: Addendum to RFRA - should a prostitute be forced to have sex with whites?

No, it's discriminating ideology that needs to be fixed. Gay people have been around far longer than Christians, religions come and go. Unless there are laws against discrimination, it won't go away. If we want to allow Christians to discriminate against the LGBT, then we aren't making progress.

If you want to allow anyone to discriminate against anyone, then you aren't making progress. Why focus on only specific groups? Why not address the whole of the problem??
 
Re: Addendum to RFRA - should a prostitute be forced to have sex with whites?

If you want to allow anyone to discriminate against anyone, then you aren't making progress. Why focus on only specific groups? Why not address the whole of the problem??

so prior to getting married, I was wrong to discriminate against gay people in choosing possibly partners?

this notion that it is wrong to discriminate is asinine.
 
Re: Addendum to RFRA - should a prostitute be forced to have sex with whites?

No! I don't get the point, because, not only wouldn't they cater during Passover to the Muslim, they wouldn't do it for the gay guy, the straight guy, the Christian, the Hindu, the Jew or the atheist. You'll need to dream up another gotcha hypothetical to distract from the real time discrimination that Christians are projecting on the LGBT community.

BS. Have a nice day.
 
Re: Addendum to RFRA - should a prostitute be forced to have sex with whites?

If you want to allow anyone to discriminate against anyone, then you aren't making progress. Why focus on only specific groups? Why not address the whole of the problem??

Was Rosa Parks discriminating against White people when she moved to the front of the bus and took a seat?
 
Re: Addendum to RFRA - should a prostitute be forced to have sex with whites?

If Sally is a legally recognized prostitute in the state of Nevada and thus her product is sex, then denying that product to individuals based upon their race is by definition discrimination.

If it is that big of a deal with Sally, then she is certainly free to find another profession to work in and thus would never have to sell her product (sex with her) to a white man.



Now now let's not bring common sense into this debate.
 
Re: Addendum to RFRA - should a prostitute be forced to have sex with whites?

Was Rosa Parks discriminating against White people when she moved to the front of the bus and took a seat?

In that case the rhetoric was "Stop discriminating against black people." when it should have been "Stop discriminating." Had this approach been taken, we might not even be having this discussion. Those on the left always seem to focus on one facet of a problem, while ignoring the rest. The problem here isn't "Homosexuals are being discriminated against.", it's "We need to make it clear what forms of discrimination are acceptable and what forms aren't." Making a blanket statement that any form of discrimination is wrong costs us the right to choose who we deal with personally and as a business owner. For example, any business that sells alcohol or tobacco products is REQUIRED by law to discriminate based on age. Businesses that give discounts to seniors are discriminating. Clubs that require paid memberships are discriminating. Our problem is that what is allowed and not allowed is so vaguely defined, that it comes down to which judge hears your case as to how the case is decided and that's a VERY bad thing.
 
Re: Addendum to RFRA - should a prostitute be forced to have sex with whites?

In that case the rhetoric was "Stop discriminating against black people." when it should have been "Stop discriminating." Had this approach been taken, we might not even be having this discussion. Those on the left always seem to focus on one facet of a problem, while ignoring the rest. The problem here isn't "Homosexuals are being discriminated against.", it's "We need to make it clear what forms of discrimination are acceptable and what forms aren't." Making a blanket statement that any form of discrimination is wrong costs us the right to choose who we deal with personally and as a business owner. For example, any business that sells alcohol or tobacco products is REQUIRED by law to discriminate based on age. Businesses that give discounts to seniors are discriminating. Clubs that require paid memberships are discriminating. Our problem is that what is allowed and not allowed is so vaguely defined, that it comes down to which judge hears your case as to how the case is decided and that's a VERY bad thing.

Well certainly Christian discrimination against gay people, for no other reason then the fact that they are gay, is one of the unacceptable forms of discrimination.
 
Re: Addendum to RFRA - should a prostitute be forced to have sex with whites?

Well certainly Christian discrimination against gay people, for no other reason then the fact that they are gay, is one of the unacceptable forms of discrimination.

So this isn't about stopping all discrimination, it's about stopping just one type that you dislike... Sad to see that you WON'T do what's right and insist on just doing what's demanded of you by your ideology. It's attitudes like your that lead to discrimination, not stop it. You choose what you find acceptable and base it ENTIRELY on your own personal bigotry and nothing else. In this case, you would stop one group of people from doing something, but allow others to do the same thing. When will the left learn that you stop problems by addressing the root cause, not by attacking their target of the moment???
 
Re: Addendum to RFRA - should a prostitute be forced to have sex with whites?

So this isn't about stopping all discrimination, it's about stopping just one type that you dislike... Sad to see that you WON'T do what's right and insist on just doing what's demanded of you by your ideology. It's attitudes like your that lead to discrimination, not stop it. You choose what you find acceptable and base it ENTIRELY on your own personal bigotry and nothing else. In this case, you would stop one group of people from doing something, but allow others to do the same thing. When will the left learn that you stop problems by addressing the root cause, not by attacking their target of the moment???

Sorry dude, try as you may, equal rights isn't an ideology. I would be criticising the gay owners of a bakery were they to deny you service on the basis of your Christianity, too!!!
 
Re: Addendum to RFRA - should a prostitute be forced to have sex with whites?

Sorry dude, try as you may, equal rights isn't an ideology. I would be criticising the gay owners of a bakery were they to deny you service on the basis of your Christianity, too!!!

0.jpg
 
An interesting question that got asked.


Sally decides to go to Nevada and become a prostitute. She wants to go to college later on, and needs the money.

Sally, however, is black, and has traumatic memories of being racially discriminated against / abused / what-have-you by white men. So Sally decides she's not willing to have sex with white men - it's too personal, too painful.


Should the state force Sally to have sex with white men, against her will? Should the state force her to be sexually penetrated by the men who will re-awaken her trauma, or punish her if she doesn't want to?

yes, if she chooses to be a prostitute she should be required not to discriminate. kind of a silly hypothetical though, isn't it?
 
Re: Addendum to RFRA - should a prostitute be forced to have sex with whites?

i asked in another thread and no one from "your" side would respond

i have a hasidic jewish bakery a few blocks from my house......there is a meeting place for members of the nazi party less than four miles from the bakery

should the members of that "club" be able to force the owners to bake them a "happy birthday Hitler cake?"

i doubt they ever would ask....but what if they did

do the accommodation laws extend into right/wrong issues like this?

this is a kosher jewish bakery......

my opinion is no.....they should NEVER have to make that cake.....period

but what say you all?

they should be made to serve them the same way they would serve every other customer. if they would serve a non-Nazi customer a happy birthday hitler cake, then they should also be required to serve a Nazi customer a happy birthday hitler cake.
 
Re: Addendum to RFRA - should a prostitute be forced to have sex with whites?

This is not a question about Sally, but about the State. Sally has been a prostitute for some time now, and discriminating all that time - should the state punish her for her discrimination or force her to have sex with white men?

yes it should punish her if she broke any laws.
 
Re: Addendum to RFRA - should a prostitute be forced to have sex with whites?

Gene Wilder has become the Godwin's Law of memes.

They don't call me Godwin's Lawyer for nothing. :cool:
 
Back
Top Bottom