• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are Republicans against helping the middle class?

Are Republicans against helping the middle class?


  • Total voters
    83
democrats get rich through public office buying votes with the money of others.
we should do everything possible to discourage people who cannot properly raise children from breeding

What the hell?
 
far too many children are spawned by irresponsible people which leads to more poverty

One second, are you a christian? I want to evaluate something, and you can say they're irresponsible all you want, it's like you were inferring that all democrats are irresponsible people..
 
One second, are you a christian? I want to evaluate something, and you can say they're irresponsible all you want, it's like you were inferring that all democrats are irresponsible people..

If you have children you cannot properly provide for-you are irresponsible
 
yawn, complete nonsense. those who whine about capitalism are those who have failed to succeed here

I'm not whinnying about capitalism, it's preferred to dictatorship, monarchy, oligarchy, kings and queens, despots, totalitarianism, authoritarianism, or any other ambition that compromises individual liberty, but it MUST be regulated!
 
I'm not whinnying about capitalism, it's preferred to dictatorship, monarchy, oligarchy, kings and queens, despots, totalitarianism, authoritarianism, or any other ambition that compromises individual liberty, but it MUST be regulated!

are you a horse?:mrgreen:
 
actually I answered you directly.

You ignored my point on religion, and if democrats are all irresponsible. Unbelievable. Here is some advice from Jesus.
Truly, I say unto you, it will
be hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. [Matthew 19:23]
 
You dodged everything I said and repeated what you've already posted.

You're talking to somebody who would shoot you in the head and then eat a nice dinner not thinking about it.
 
You're talking to somebody who would shoot you in the head and then eat a nice dinner not thinking about it.

what sort of pernicious idiocy is this? I would never eat an animal rights activist,
 
You're talking to somebody who would shoot you in the head and then eat a nice dinner not thinking about it.

He knows he's a heartless human being, it's why he ignores facts that show "entitlement" programs work, because he can't stand the idea of people getting help.
 
I'm not whinnying about capitalism, it's preferred to dictatorship, monarchy, oligarchy, kings and queens, despots, totalitarianism, authoritarianism, or any other ambition that compromises individual liberty, but it MUST be regulated!

while i agree there must be regulation, that regulation on people or business was meant to be as close to the people as possible on the state level not by a government 3000 miles away, and that regulation is meant to protect rights and the health and safety of the public and that is all.
 
what sort of pernicious idiocy is this? I would never eat an animal rights activist,

Keep ignoring relevant points of discussion with nonsense, you make yourself look intelligent doing that.
 
while i agree there must be regulation, that regulation on people or business was meant to be as close to the people as possible on the state level not by a government 3000 miles away, and that regulation is meant to protect rights and the health and safety of the public and that is all.

If we allow individual states to do it, that will be even worse. It shouldn't be hard to see why.
 
this is coming from the guy who claims I murder people? I am making fun of your spelling

You continue to ignore his points and mine, just shows that you shut down when confronted with facts and showing you for who you are ;)
 
while i agree there must be regulation, that regulation on people or business was meant to be as close to the people as possible on the state level not by a government 3000 miles away, and that regulation is meant to protect rights and the health and safety of the public and that is all.

Indubitably.
 
If we allow individual states to do it, that will be even worse. It shouldn't be hard to see why.

if the federal government was meat to do that, the founders would have delegated them power to do it but they didn't, the delegated them with the power to settle commerce disputes among the states.

if the federal government have been delegated a power to regulate business and people, then that would allow the federal government to be directly involved in the personal lifes of the people...........they didn't grant that power to the federal government, that remained a power of the states.
 
Just look at the vote-a-rama being conducted by McConnell in the Senate tonight.
Then check out the mess the House is passing, with the GOP reinvention of defense spending off budget .
 
Back
Top Bottom