• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are there any realistic Democrat Alternatives to Hillary

Is Hillary the Democrats only REALISTICALLY PLAUSIBLE option?

  • Yes. It's Hillary Or Bust for the Democrats.

    Votes: 12 33.3%

  • No - there is at least one other possibility (name)

    Votes: 13 36.1%

  • No - there are many other plausibly realistic possibilities

    Votes: 11 30.6%
  • Total voters
    36
disneydude said:
LOL....none of the current GOP lot can hold a candle in the GE. You guys might as well nominate Cruz beause he stands as much chance as any of the others. The reality is, the one one who stands a chance in the GE (assuming Hilary runs) is Christie....and he will never get close to getting the nomination.
Click to expand...

:shrug: enjoy cheapening your soul to advocate for ClintonInc. for the next 18 months.

But if this is your best case, then.... well, that's sad :(.
 
cpwill said:
:shrug: enjoy cheapening your soul to advocate for ClintonInc. for the next 18 months.

But if this is your best case, then.... well, that's sad :(.
Click to expand...

I'm not "advocating for Clinton"....just pointing out the reality that you face. Personally, I would prefer Warren...the Clinton's have always been way too moderate for my tastes. That being said...the point of the thread is the "depth of the benches". Just because you have a lot of players on the bench doesn't mean that any of them are any good...and certainly in this group of GOP frontrunners, there is none that is ever going to be an allstar....just sayin.
 
disneydude said:
I'm not "advocating for Clinton"....just pointing out the reality that you face. Personally, I would prefer Warren...the Clinton's have always been way too moderate for my tastes. That being said...the point of the thread is the "depth of the benches". Just because you have a lot of players on the bench doesn't mean that any of them are any good...and certainly in this group of GOP frontrunners, there is none that is ever going to be an allstar....just sayin.
Click to expand...

:shrug: you are throwing poo at a wall and hoping it sticks. You haven't raised a substantive reply to any of the candidates listed, nor have you demonstrated that The Inevitable One is anything close to being a good candidate.
 
disneydude said:
I'm not "advocating for Clinton"....just pointing out the reality that you face. Personally, I would prefer Warren...the Clinton's have always been way too moderate for my tastes. That being said...the point of the thread is the "depth of the benches". Just because you have a lot of players on the bench doesn't mean that any of them are any good...and certainly in this group of GOP frontrunners, there is none that is ever going to be an allstar....just sayin.
Click to expand...

We all know your modus operandi is to proclaim Party A is hopeless in comparison with Party B because its only "sane choice" is also the one that conveniently is seen as having less chance at winning a primary bout. However, should even that person come out victorious, you would still call them hopeless and "not sane."

That's why when Hillary is perhaps the inevitable choice, you won't have much by way of complaints. You'll offer a few pithy reminders that Warren was better, but on the whole, you'll charge forward without any sense of regret for your Party's candidate. You wouldn't give a Republican the same benefit, because you aren't a Republican.

In short: a Party man through and through...a Debbie Schultz without any accompanied salary to make the Stating the Party line meaningful.
 
Last edited:
I'm dreaming for Bernie Sanders/Elizabeth Warren, would take either.. But it's a dream.. Although Bernie might run.
 
I have an alternative...but they won't like it...

Ron Paul.

:)
 
Lursa said:
???? ORLY?

See: Sarah Palin
Click to expand...

Sarah Palin worked her way up from local politics, and then took on corrupt politicians in her own party. She is a clear voice for Liberty, and that scares the **** out of Leftists and their propagandists. It's why they worked hard... overtime to discredit her... meanwhile Obama... an anti-American and gaff machine almost on par with Biden got cover.

I hope Hillary runs. She's corrupt to the core, and everyone knows it.
 
Paschendale said:
It's funny to hear people complain about the status quo and then support the electoral college, a measure put in place to protect that status quo.
Click to expand...
There is a reason for it, and if you don't like it... elect people to office across the land to have it changed.

By being so out of touch with reality that you think those accusations are actually true.
Click to expand...
Ayers, Wright, Alinsky, and Davis.

Communists, Anti-Americans, a racist mentor and a terrorist.
You been sleeping, or is your desire to remain blind and ignorant of the facts?
 
iliveonramen said:
That's easy, be a party that turns off everyone except for 45+ year old white males.
Click to expand...

You think Obama's economy attracts people? ROTFLOL...
You think the Leftist manner of shoving down ObamaKare down our throats attracts people?
You think his executive orders attract people?

Look at the last couple midterms. Absolute ass kickings across the country... nationally and statewide.

Had we a Reagan styled Conservative who was fearless, and exposed the anti-American race baiter in the White House... we would have won in 2012.
But we didn't have such an individual as a candidate in either 08 or 12.
 
shrubnose said:
That was 15 years ago. A lot of the people who voted for him are dead and buried.
Click to expand...

That shouldn't matter. Many of them were dead and buried fifteen years ago, when they voted for him!

...it's how the Democrats roll.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom