- Joined
- May 19, 2011
- Messages
- 4,811
- Reaction score
- 2,647
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
1. There's by no means a slam dunk case this violates the logan act
2. The logan act isn't treason.
Care to actually provide some kind of meaningful and worth while original content? Or just want to mindlessly link wikipedia posts that don't relate to what was asked in the thread topic or in the quote you stated?
It's nice to see a conservative agree that there is a case that this violated the Logan act. It's certainly not an air tight case, and I can't imagine any prosecutions ever taking place. But if one did and this went to the SCOTUS, the outcome is far from certain.
Way too many people take an Us vs Them mentality, refusing to see any wrongs by their side and any rights by the other. Liberals calling this treason: totally unhelpful. Treason should be taken off the table. This may be terrible judgement, it's certainly irresponsible, and may be slightly criminal, but it is not treason.