- Joined
- May 14, 2009
- Messages
- 24,583
- Reaction score
- 8,629
- Location
- Israel
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
First of all, you mischaracterise my position, which has always been, everybody has them, or nobody has them, stated such repeatedly. With the caveat that nobody having them as a preference. But sense I, and most everybody else has insisted, there will be no nuclear disarmament, what does that bring us back to, hmm? Obviously, sense nobodies going to get rid of them, it may just be what Iran would consider in their interest. Never mind that I have posted multiple sources with US and Israeli intelligence declaring that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and hasn't decided to build one. Now then, care to comment on the Council on Foreign Relations position that an Iranian nuclear weapons program would bring stability to the region? Or does that so **** up your meme, that you can't address it?
You've just argued for Iranian nukes.
A person who argues for Iranian nukes cannot argue that nuclear weapons are bad and he doesn't want anyone to have them.
It's ridiculous. It's absurd. Take your efforts to convince anyone that you're not an immoral pro-Iranian propagandist elsewhere.