• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

In Retrospect, Should Clinton/U.S. have Bombed the Serbs to protect Muslims?

In Retrospect, Should Clinton/U.S. have Bombed the Serbs to protect Muslims?

  • Yes U.S. (NATO) bombing of the Serbs was a good thing.

    Votes: 6 66.7%

  • No U.S. (NATO) bombing of Serbs was a bad thing.

    Votes: 3 33.3%
  • Total voters
    9
Ryan5

Ryan5

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
2,191
Reaction score
483
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Private
In Retrospect, Should Clinton/U.S. have Bombed the Serbs to protect Muslims? (I think, as an American, this was a very bad move historically, geopolitical speaking if not an outright idiotic one).

ubgfLbH.jpg

PQA4o0D.png

VPHS1xj.jpg
 
I don't like "in retrospect" ideas. If something is a mistake it will be apparent at that time.
 
Yup. The Geopolitical effects of that decision were almost wholly positive.
 
What kind of question is this?

Have the Bosnian Muslims caused any problems since then? Anything that would suggest once helping them was a mistake? Not that I am aware of ...
 
Ryan5 said:
In Retrospect, Should Clinton/U.S. have Bombed the Serbs to protect Muslims? (I think, as an American, this was a very bad move historically, geopolitical speaking if not an outright idiotic one).

ubgfLbH.jpg

PQA4o0D.png

VPHS1xj.jpg
Click to expand...

Retrospect or not Clinton was wrong to bomb the Serbs.
 
Clinton helped slow down a genocide in progress and a massacre. Though I tend to be against US involvement in ethnic and sectarian conflicts, Clinton did the most pragmatic thing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom