If I may jump in here just a bit, I will agree with you that good functioning societies have to have some level of parameters that the collective draw to say, hey that's a bit far. America began with them set pretty far out, and there have been times when they have been drawn in and times when they've been pushed back out. One thing is certain, there will always be a tug of war between a people and its governors, and due diligence requires that people recognise that and the increased responsibility that comes with increased freedoms. Of the doctrines that a denomination such as the Seventh Day Adventists, which holds a thousand different doctrines (number admittedly pulled from my ass) that may have this one or two doctrines, that they wish not to vaccinate there children, or allow them to receive a life saving blood transfusion, it seems reasonable to me that society, leaving alone the 998 others, would say no, you won't be allowed to do that, without being accused of telling people what to do. But it will always be a struggle, and folk will always have differing views on where those boundaries should lay. But another certainty, we would never want to live in a society where either its citizens stopped fighting for liberty, or its governors stopped pushing back on it. Ones tyranny and ones anarchy, neither of which has any appeal.