Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?
Again the Zimmerman case was a travesty. What reason did he have to attack the kid? None. If anything martin was the one that could have used stand your ground.
As I said it could have also gotten there when the shot was fired and he was putting his hands up.
Furthermore he wasn't justified in shooting him the last times, all witness testimony (except 40, who was discredited) said brown did not charge.
Also the prosecution botched the whole thing.
The right was the one calling to let the cop go before any evidence was released. The left called for a FAIR trial, which is not what happened. Who has those preconceived notions again?
You aren't a professional forensics examiner, and the ones that testified said they only way this blood from the dead thug got inside the police vehicle, as well as the only way powder residue got on his dominant arm was because he was in the vehicle. The rest of the shots took place at a much further range where powder residue would not be seen.
The Zimmerman case was spot on, as was this-even if your preconceived notions dont fit-and the grand jury agreed.
Again the Zimmerman case was a travesty. What reason did he have to attack the kid? None. If anything martin was the one that could have used stand your ground.
As I said it could have also gotten there when the shot was fired and he was putting his hands up.
Furthermore he wasn't justified in shooting him the last times, all witness testimony (except 40, who was discredited) said brown did not charge.
Also the prosecution botched the whole thing.
The right was the one calling to let the cop go before any evidence was released. The left called for a FAIR trial, which is not what happened. Who has those preconceived notions again?