• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Was Sony correct canceling "The Interview?"

Was Sony correct canceling "The Interview?"

  • Total voters
    71
pbrauer

pbrauer

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2010
Messages
25,394
Reaction score
7,208
Location
Oregon
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
Yes, We don't want anybody killed or injured.
No, their decision reflects badly on the USA.
Meh
Other
 
Why didn't you just add a normal poll?

Anyway, no, definitely not correct in cancelling it.
 
For them it was probably the best, as they have something on Sony they REALLY don't want released.


Nothing to do with the threat of violence, that's nonsense.


I don't think they left over $200 mil on the table over saber rattiling, it's something internal to sony, they don't want released.
 
NOOOO, I think it's absolutely ridiculous.... I wanted to see that movie...wtf??? I can't believe this is actually happening... will the movie never come out?

And I wonder... what if this is just a publicity stunt. To get the movie hyped. So that everybody and their mother are going want to see a movie they are "not allowed" to see.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
For them it was probably the best, as they have something on Sony they REALLY don't want released.


Nothing to do with the threat of violence, that's nonsense.


I don't think they left over $200 mil on the table over saber rattiling, it's something internal to sony, they don't want released.
Click to expand...

Most likely, but that doesn't make it any less pathetic.
 
1. Sony cancelled it after all the major theaters decided not to air it. In other words, there's no point in releasing a movie that will not be shown anywhere. Therefore, the more appropriate question to ask, from my perspective, is "were the theaters correct in cancelling "The Interview"?

2. As far as that last question, I can't say for sure what I would have done if I were in the theaters' position. On the one hand, I would be hesitant to release a movie when a terrorist threats were made against the theaters just so that people could see a stupid movie. I would hate (understatement) to go through with something that could ultimately lead to civilian deaths. On the other hand, I would not want to cave into such coercion and intimidation. I would have probably contacted the government in order to discern whether or not the threats were credible. If the government didn't think they were credible, I would probably go through with a limited release and increase security at theaters, if possible, just to be safe.

It's unfortunate North Korea's intimidation has reached beyond its borders, but it would be more unfortunate if people died because theaters were too proud to heed warnings. I think the theaters made the appropriate short-term response. However, the U.S. government must craft a long-term strategy to deal with such coercion.
 
ThePlayDrive said:
1. Sony cancelled it after all the major theaters decided not to air it. In other words, there's no point in releasing a movie that will not be shown anywhere. Therefore, the more appropriate question to ask, from my perspective, is "were the theaters correct in cancelling "The Interview"?

2. As far as that last question, I can't say for sure what I would have done if I were in the theaters' position. On the one hand, I would be hesitant to release a movie when a terrorist threats were made against the theaters just so that people could see a stupid movie. I would hate (understatement) to go through with something that could ultimately lead to civilian deaths. On the other hand, I would not want to cave into such coercion and intimidation. I would have probably contacted the government in order to discern whether or not the threats were credible. If the government didn't think they were credible, I would probably go through with a limited release and increase security at theaters, if possible, just to be safe.

It's unfortunate North Korea's intimidation has reached beyond its borders, but it would be more unfortunate if people died because theaters were too proud to heed warnings. I think the theaters made the appropriate short-term response. However, the U.S. government must craft a long-term strategy to deal with such coercion.
Click to expand...




Can you name the last terrorist attack the N. Koreans engaged in?


A few theaters cancelled it.


They are hiding something.
 
I saw a movie the other night in the theater where the Aurora shooting happened. It was very unsettling, and I felt a little jumpy the whole time I was there. These threats hit a little closer to home for me than it probably does for others. I think the theaters did the right thing canceling the showings. But the whole thing is a shame and makes me mad. I hope they can take some action against the hackers.

Oh, and I plan to watch this movie now just to spite North Korea. I might actually pay when I download it.
 
The terrorists have scored yet another major victory.
 
It looks like Sony's decision was based on theater companies not wanting to show the film. That's more a reflection on the theaters. That being said, Sony could have released the movie to television, PPV, streaming, etc. THAT decision is on them.

This whole episode is indicative of how far down the rabbit hole we've fallen. The idea that a vague threat by a group that has shown no capability of carrying out the threat can prompt this reaction is sickening.

Hell, I bought a copy of The Satanic Verses just because of all the threats the jihadi's were making and they actually had a history of carrying out threats.
 
CRUE CAB said:
Could be. I don't see it making good numbers at theaters. Maybe the hype will get it going on pay per view.
Click to expand...



I have a feeling the flick is a bomb. My one time neighbor Seth hasn't had any big ones of late, and if the audio clips are any example, this is a stinker. Before the big threat, there was talk of going direct to video for "security reasons"

So, rather than lose another $100 million, they cut their loses and create a huge demand in DVD and PPV.

Frankly, I am disappointed at the US response over all. I would have thought the greatest nation on earth would rally, that patriots would have flooded theaters to show those Korean pricks they will not be bullied by a primitive people.

Once again, terrorism wins.
 
Although this movie wasn't going to be as good as "The Wizard of OZ" or "Gone with the Wind" it was still wrong to pull it to cowtow to the troublemakers.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
A few theaters cancelled it.
Click to expand...
The four largest theater chains in the country - Regal, AMC, Cinemark and Carmike - pulled it from their theaters. That's not "a few theaters". Those companies account for 1526 theaters in the country - that's the vast majority of theaters. Like I said, Sony had no choice but to pull it after they pulled out.
 
No.
PQEQxdp.png
 
I would never have paid to watch that movie. Then again I'd never watch it period even for free..
 
Lutherf said:
It looks like Sony's decision was based on theater companies not wanting to show the film. That's more a reflection on the theaters. That being said, Sony could have released the movie to television, PPV, streaming, etc. THAT decision is on them.

This whole episode is indicative of how far down the rabbit hole we've fallen. The idea that a vague threat by a group that has shown no capability of carrying out the threat can prompt this reaction is sickening.

Hell, I bought a copy of The Satanic Verses just because of all the threats the jihadi's were making and they actually had a history of carrying out threats.
Click to expand...

Honestly, if I was Sony, I'd release the film onto the Internet for free for anyone who wants to download it and see it. I'd simply put up a "donate" button for anyone who wants to give them money to defray their costs. Let the terrorists try to do anything with that.
 
ThePlayDrive said:
The four largest theater chains in the country - Regal, AMC, Cinemark and Carmike - pulled it from their theaters. That's not "a few theaters". Those companies account for 1526 theaters in the country - that's the vast majority of theaters. Like I said, Sony had no choice but to pull it after they pulled out.
Click to expand...



There are 40,000 theaters in the us.... they represent 3.815% of all theaters in the country.
 
pbrauer said:
Yes, We don't want anybody killed or injured.
No, their decision reflects badly on the USA.
Meh
Other
Click to expand...

Seems rather clear to me, North Korea not only had the emails, but they had PICTURES!


jamie-foxx-wanda.jpg

Probably the last straw...
 
Well, let's see here, a movie is made about the CIA telling journalists to off (kill) the leader of another country.

Why would anyone consider making a movie like that in the first place? IMO, it's in bad taste. Besides, doesn't America have some sort of credo that it's not supposed to assassinate leaders of other countries? As much as people might dislike NK leadership, and other countries leadership, is it a good thing to send a message like that? That we're coming to get you?

and people sit around wondering why people of other nations want to, and do cause harm and death to Americans... definitely a head scratcher-trying to figure out why. stupid Sony.

and people wonder why NK has nuclear ambitions.
 
AJiveMan said:
Well, let's see here, a movie is made about the CIA telling journalists to off (kill) the leader of another country.

Why would anyone consider making a movie like that in the first place? IMO, it's in bad taste. Besides, doesn't America have some sort of credo that it's not supposed to assassinate leaders of other countries? As much as people might dislike NK leadership, and other countries leadership, is it a good thing to send a message like that? That we're coming to get you?

and people sit around wondering why people of other nations want to, and do cause harm and death to Americans... definitely a head scratcher-trying to figure out why. stupid Sony.
Click to expand...

That is probably one of the dumbest pieces of analysis I have seen in foreign policy. It's right up there with a Canadian who a few years ago told me that the only reason that China et. al. maintained a military was because the U.S. had a military, and if we laid down our arms, the rest of the world would follow.
 
cpwill said:
That is probably one of the dumbest pieces of analysis I have seen in foreign policy. It's right up there with a Canadian who a few years ago told me that the only reason that China et. al. maintained a military was because the U.S. had a military, and if we laid down our arms, the rest of the world would follow.
Click to expand...
Thanks for your critique. Amurika should go kill everyone who hates it. :lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom