You know full well, they will call her a Communist, a Marxist, a Fascist and everything else under the sun.
YES
NO
OTHER
I voted Other, as in I sure hope we wouldn't, but hey,we have voters in this country who can't figure out how to use a ballot correctly.
If we assume that she is the Democrat's nominee, then she'll get all the liberals/progressives/Democrats to vote for her and all the conservatives/libertarians/Republicans to vote against her. That leaves all the fence-sitting moderates and self-proclaimed independents. Now this bunch already got burned when they got sucked in by Obama. Does anyone really think they'll let themselves get sucked in again...by another left-wing Democrat?
You know full well, they will call her a Communist, a Marxist, a Fascist and everything else under the sun.
YES
NO
OTHER
You know full well, they will call her a Communist, a Marxist, a Fascist and everything else under the sun.
YES
NO
OTHER
She should hold off for an election cycle or two if she wants a chance. Any liberal candidate should
If it's possible for a second rate community organizer with zero experience in politics to fool a nation, I suppose you could run a ****ing corpse and with the right ad men, get it elected
The only burning that anyone (besides right wing hacks) have felt from Obama is when he goes to the middle, not when he sticks by the left. No one got suckered in. No matter how much the right clings to this narrative, it won't become true. Try examining the real president, not the empty chair.
Fifty-four percent — let me repeat, 54 percent — said that Obama "cannot lead and get the job done," while just 42 percent said he could lead. I asked the pollsters behind the NBC-WSJ survey for the party ID breakouts on that question, and here's what they sent me: 84 percent of Republicans said that Obama can't lead or get the job done, as did six in ten (61 percent) of independents. (Just one in five Democrats agreed.)
That is an absolutely remarkable vote of no-confidence in Obama's ability to do the job he was elected to do. Yes, I know that Republicans are going to be against virtually everything Obama is for and that independents these days tend to be swollen with the ranks of disaffected GOPers. And yes, I am aware of the fact that Obama doesn't need to win any more elections. (Thanks to Democrats on Twitter for that reminder!)
But, what Obama does have to do is be president for the next two and a half years. And he'd like to spend that time building some sort of second-term legacy for himself. The leadership numbers — if they sustain — badly complicate those efforts.
The single most depressing number for President Obama in the NBC/Wall Street Journal poll - The Washington Post
Independents give the edge to Republicans over Democrats on all of the issues tested.
Fox News Poll: Race for Congress tightens, confidence in Obama low | Fox News
Assuming she ran, and won the nomination it would depend entirely on who she ran against in the general election. Could she win? Yes, but she would need help.
You know full well, they will call her a Communist, a Marxist, a Fascist and everything else under the sun.
YES
NO
OTHER
Yes. It is only communism if you do not like what she says. When you do like it, it is common sense.
To be able to win, considering the potential Republican candidates at this current time, would be able to breath.
Phfft. That goes for any ideology. Anyone believes their likes are common sense, and they could substitute any polar opposite ideology in place of communism.
Fauxcahontas Warren has just as much of chance as anyone does. Obama pulled it off twice.
The absolute last thing this country needs is another liberal law professor.
Assuming she ran, and won the nomination it would depend entirely on who she ran against in the general election. Could she win? Yes, but she would need help.
Do you mean President Obama isn't really black? He's nothing more than a Al Jolson?Fauxcahontas Warren has just as much of chance as anyone does. Obama pulled it off twice.