• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Elizabeth Warren part Native American?

Is Elizabeth Warren part Native American?


  • Total voters
    78
My point is that you made claims, and are now trying every single weasel tactic to distance yourself from those claims. You were asked to demonstrate that Warren had benefited from her claims (As you had asserted earlier in the thread). You couldn't. Now you're just trying to waste bandwidth by distancing yourself from you unsubstantiated claims. It's not working. :shrug:

A statement of belief requires no substantiation. Any fair reading of this exchange would conclude that your position is delusional and, to be honest, a little weird.
 
Thank you for making my point. Statements of belief they were and remain.

Still more nonsense. You claimed she had benefited from her NA. Then when asked to provide evidence, you changed your approach nearly 100 thread posts later and claimed it was "a belief". Keep trying, Hays. Your backtracking and weasel strategies are becoming more and more obvious with every engagement.
 
Still more nonsense. You claimed she had benefited from her NA. Then when asked to provide evidence, you changed your approach nearly 100 thread posts later and claimed it was "a belief". Keep trying, Hays. Your backtracking and weasel strategies are becoming more and more obvious with every engagement.

There was nothing to change "nearly 100 thread posts later" because my "approach" had been the same from the beginning. I'm sorry you missed that.
 
There was nothing to change "nearly 100 thread posts later" because my "approach" had been the same from the beginning.

Still lying? You stated she had benefited from her NA heritage. Then when asked to provide proof, you couldn't. This was pointed out to you and you stated it was a "belief". Again Hays, you keep backtracking on your words and it's pretty obvious that you keep distancing yourself from your unproven claims. Sort of like Elizabeth Warren? ;)
 
Still lying? You stated she had benefited from her NA heritage. Then when asked to provide proof, you couldn't. This was pointed out to you and you stated it was a "belief". Again Hays, you keep backtracking on your words and it's pretty obvious that you keep distancing yourself from your unproven claims. Sort of like Elizabeth Warren? ;)

I am exactly the same distance from my belief as when we began. It's mine.
 
I am exactly the same distance from my belief as when we began. It's mine.

Keep digging Hays, your claims were proven to be unsubstantiated because you couldn't substantiate them. Not only could you not substantiate that "Elizabeth Warren benefited" from her claims, you've now devolved into this shell that is trying at all costs to save face. I love it when people get to this point.
 
Keep digging Hays, your claims were proven to be unsubstantiated because you couldn't substantiate them. Not only could you not substantiate that "Elizabeth Warren benefited" from her claims, you've now devolved into this shell that is trying at all costs to save face. I love it when people get to this point.

:soap:ranton:
 
There was nothing to admit. I never said there was evidence. I voiced my belief. It remains my belief.

Throw crap against the wall and see what sticks. Nice.:roll:
 
Throw crap against the wall and see what sticks. Nice.:roll:

I know eh? He's been caught making claims and then suddenly he states it's a belief when he can't prove it. It's about as sneaky as an elephant in a china shop.
 
I don't care whether it "sticks." I stated my belief.

You find nothing wrong with the "throw crap up against the wall and see what sticks" mentality?
 
Keep up the good work.:bs

Hays, it's really sad to watch you degenerate like this. You make claims. Can't prove them. Then you get snarky. Maybe you should take a break from DP, losing arguments doesn't do you any good. :)
 
Hays, it's really sad to watch you degenerate like this. You make claims. Can't prove them. Then you get snarky. Maybe you should take a break from DP, losing arguments doesn't do you any good. :)

It is remarkable that your simple failure to follow a discussion can generate such anger. I suppose you direct it outward to avoid admitting your error to yourself.
 
This is a debating forum, the purpose of which is to discuss the members' beliefs.

What I have difficulty is when beliefs are presented as facts.
 
It is remarkable...

That you're still here when you couldn't prove your earlier claims? I agree. It is remarkable but some people just want to save face.
 
That you're still here when you couldn't prove your earlier claims? I agree. It is remarkable but some people just want to save face.

And altering someone else's post is another sign of inner problems.
 
Jesus. What's keeping this thread going?
 
Back
Top Bottom