- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,615
- Reaction score
- 9,087
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Yes. That is exactly what you display.You see, this is what we face dealing with people that exist in an ideological dream world that suggests active suspension of critical thought.
Thank you for showing all that you want to read too much into a simple question.What you seem to not realize (or are desperately trying to ignore... perhaps both) is that your thinking here is why we end up in the mentality of policing the actions of other nations in a manner we see fit no matter what we are doing in our own backyard. The severity of impact to this nation, direct or indirect or not at all, just the suggestion that we can hold some other nation responsible without explanation in how or why is itself grade school level thinking. You may not like that, but it is accurate.
Ultimately we cannot hold Mexico "responsible" except by force, and even then the impact is questionable in action and likely long term implication. You know it, and I know it.
The truth of the matter is *our* immigration problems are ours to solve. It boils down to dealing with policy in a way that makes economic and social sense then deciding to enforcing it. Until then, holding Mexico "responsible" is both absurd and a false argument. We do not bother to enforce our own laws we have on the books right now. So you pretending that you are engaging in meaningful discussion asking such an elementary question within the confines of ideological foolishness is useless.
Congrats, the above post and the language of it proves my point conclusively.
What you fail to understand that your take on this is warped and is therefor yourself that causes the problems you imagine.
And if Mexico is in part responsible (and make sure you wrap your mind around the "If") for the influx of illegals, then they should be held responsible for their part, which is and would be, taking care of our problems. The hows that could be accomplished was and still is irrelevant to the original question.
Your idea that we were supposed to be engaging in any meaningful discussion when it was a poll of where folks stood is ludicrous in the least.
That is your problem.
All I wanted to know is where folks stood.
Is that really that difficult for you to understand?
Last edited: