• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Was justice served in Ferguson?

Was justice served in Ferguson?


  • Total voters
    38
Im not the police. I just wish you'd be more considerate of those around you, they dont deserve the diminished health outcomes that your habit causes. I just try to be considerate of others.

Thanks for the lecture.

You have NO IDEA about the consideration I show non smokers, so kindly mind your own ****ing business.
 
I am going on attitude and the majority of your prior posts. One gets an intuition for these sorts of things. I believe you are as hard left as the next socialist/communist/Progressive/liberal. You are just embarrassed to admit it or, maybe, you lack the ability to recognize who you are.

Here's a tip: people might take you seriously if you debate a person and not poorly applied strawmen. As it is, you are an extremely unfunny joke. Like something from a Victoria Jackson stand-up routine.

For the record, I think the best possible verdict was probably reached as nothing can be proved. That is not any kind of what I would call "justice."
 
Thanks for the lecture.

You have NO IDEA about the consideration I show non smokers, so kindly mind your own ****ing business.

LOL. In this I can support you Kobie. You have the right to smoke. I do not smoke. I cannot stand it. I support your right to smoke. I might not want to be around you when you do or for the next five minutes afterwards but it is your life. You have all the rights you need to do as you wish.
 
Thanks for the lecture.

You have NO IDEA about the consideration I show non smokers, so kindly mind your own ****ing business.

But Kobie, its also on your clothing, etc. And there are still negative health effects for others. Just consider it.
 
Kobie can make others sick even if he's not actually blazing next to them. Not very nice.

So you think personal freedom is all fine and good as long as it's yours. Other people's freedom, well who cares?
 
Here's a tip: people might take you seriously if you debate a person and not poorly applied strawmen. As it is, you are an extremely unfunny joke. Like something from a Victoria Jackson stand-up routine.

For the record, I think the best possible verdict was probably reached as nothing can be proved. That is not any kind of what I would call "justice."

And, for the record, that is justice. Even if you do not like it a reasonable process was used. It is a standard process. A group of citizens of that community looked at the evidence, heard the witnesses, and determined that there was no reason to charge anyone.

I am crushed that you, a leftist disguised as a moderate, do not take me seriously. Actually, I am not all that crushed. If you cannot be honest with yourself why should I care what you think of me?
 
And, for the record, that is justice. Even if you do not like it a reasonable process was used. It is a standard process. A group of citizens of that community looked at the evidence, heard the witnesses, and determined that there was no reason to charge anyone.

I am crushed that you, a leftist disguised as a moderate, do not take me seriously. Actually, I am not all that crushed. If you cannot be honest with yourself why should I care what you think of me?

Nobody takes you seriously. Even the Republicans masquerading as libertarians think you're full of it.
You don't know anything about me, but apply labels liberally.

I would say that in unquestioningly taking the side of the state, you are a statist. Since you love that label, I will apply it to you.

However, more accurately, you are a righttard. Both right and none too bright.
 
And, for the record, that is justice. Even if you do not like it a reasonable process was used. It is a standard process. A group of citizens of that community looked at the evidence, heard the witnesses, and determined that there was no reason to charge anyone.

I am crushed that you, a leftist disguised as a moderate, do not take me seriously. Actually, I am not all that crushed. If you cannot be honest with yourself why should I care what you think of me?

A reasonable process is not the same as justice. OJ Simpson was acquitted in a "reasonable process," but it wasn't justice.
 
A reasonable process is not the same as justice. OJ Simpson was acquitted in a "reasonable process," but it wasn't justice.
We can agree on OJ. The Los Angeles blacks relished the idea that a black man could kill a white woman and not be convicted. They knew he was a murdered his wife and some hapless victim but he was their murderer.

Are you trying to make the case that a grand jury of Furgeson citizens were as racist, but in the opposite direction, as Los Angeles blacks? I would dispute it. The evidence supported the police officer's account. In addition, the evidence that the grand jury reviewed has been or will be released so anyone who chooses to may read it and draw their conclusions.

It is just for the innocent to not be further harassed. It is also just that a young thug died as a result of his thuggish actions.
 
It is just for the innocent to not be further harassed. It is also just that a young thug died as a result of his thuggish actions.

At the hands of the state. Which you seem to fully support.

Statist.
 
At the hands of the state. Which you seem to fully support.

Statist.

Is it really statist to support the actions of a police officer trying to apprehend a suspect who was then assaulted by the assailant?
 
Jeez, another poll I can't vote on because I'm not left-leaning or right-leaning.

Yes, justice was served in Ferguson. There was not a scrap of corroborated evidence that did not support the police officer's statement about what happened; therefore, there was no probable cause whatsoever to support an indictment.
 
We can agree on OJ. The Los Angeles blacks relished the idea that a black man could kill a white woman and not be convicted. They knew he was a murdered his wife and some hapless victim but he was their murderer.

Are you trying to make the case that a grand jury of Furgeson citizens were as racist, but in the opposite direction, as Los Angeles blacks? I would dispute it. The evidence supported the police officer's account. In addition, the evidence that the grand jury reviewed has been or will be released so anyone who chooses to may read it and draw their conclusions.

It is just for the innocent to not be further harassed. It is also just that a young thug died as a result of his thuggish actions.

I think that in both cases, a correct legal verdict was reached based on evidence. Unlike you, I'm not going to race bait.

However, in neither case was justice done.
 
You dont understand what a statist is, statist.
Its hardly surprising.

A statist supports the state, and state control. You support the state controlling people and killing them at will.

That is a statist.
 
Jeez, another poll I can't vote on because I'm not left-leaning or right-leaning.

Yes, justice was served in Ferguson. There was not a scrap of corroborated evidence that did not support the police officer's statement about what happened; therefore, there was no probable cause whatsoever to support an indictment.


furthermore-when the main witnesses (and I use that term loosely) against the cop are all liars, that further strengthens the case for what the GJ did.

one of the reasons I was not even arrested when I shot mope was because the one mope who was not shot claimed I shot his confederate for no reason and at a distance.

however, the EMT testified that the gunshot was a CONTACT shot, as did three other witnesses and the unshot mope told another prisoner (the cell was wired) that he and his buddy had tried to mug someone and their target then shot the other mope.

so as the judge noted, when one side (mine) all tell the same consistent with the facts and evidece-truth, and the other side lies, there can be only one conclusion
 
Nobody takes you seriously. Even the Republicans masquerading as libertarians think you're full of it.
I do seem to generate a large number of responses from the leftists and a few people who have no idea what they are. It works for me.

You don't know anything about me, but apply labels liberally.
You reveal far more than you realize in your posts. You are mostly left.

I would say that in unquestioningly taking the side of the state, you are a statist. Since you love that label, I will apply it to you.
This tells me that you have difficulty paying attention. Citizens, not the state, made the determination that there was no evidence worthy of bringing charges. So you continue to be both left and wrong. A grand jury, being a body of citizens brought together to consider the evidence is the opposite of statism. So not only are you wrong, you are incredibly uninformed about the simplest of matters.

However, more accurately, you are a righttard. Both right and none too bright.
I am willing to match my intelligence, and my accomplishments against yours if you like. How shall we proceed?

It is true I am strongly for individual liberty and freedoms and stand against the left. I know you pretend, if only with yourself, that you are a moderate. In this discussion, as in others, you throw out the decisions of the citizens and support the actions of an unruly mob.

I wonder why that is.
 
A statist supports the state, and state control. You support the state controlling people and killing them at will.

That is a statist.

The state didn't kill Mike Brown at will. He attacked a police officer after a robbery. And then he came back for seconds. I'd expect a cop to shoot such an animal.
 
You actually claimed that liberals should have to pay extra taxes to compensate victims of the riots in Ferguson. That is one of the dumbest things I've ever read.

Well, I guess you could make a case for the race hustlers that were inciting riot to be responsible for the property destruction, or not?
What do you think, Kobie?
 
Back
Top Bottom