• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is assasination ever called for

Is assasination ever the right thing to do

  • In some cases assasination is right

    Votes: 30 83.3%
  • assasination is never right EVER

    Votes: 6 16.7%

  • Total voters
    36
I don't expect a libertarian to see the bigger picture. However, if I must:



Lifeisshort on Obama



You have a poster who thinks Obama is trying to do like Hitler did, and then the same poster who asks 'what if Hitler had been assassinated before he implemented his full agenda'? The connection is not hard to see. Unless you're a libertarian.

that's a bit misleading man.... those statements he made are from 2 different threads on 2 different subjects..... and you still fail to understand that, in this thread, Obama hasn't been a subject of debate.

feel free to keep throwing a tantrum though.. that's something I DO expect from a "moderate"
 
that's a bit misleading man.... those statements he made are from 2 different threads on 2 different subjects..... and you still fail to understand that, in this thread, Obama hasn't been a subject of debate. feel free to keep throwing a tantrum though.. that's something I DO expect from a "moderate"
That's a bit misleading? Lol. He's not the first poster to try it. ChuzLife pulled the same strategy years ago using abortion and it was as seethrough then as it is now.
 
That's a bit misleading? Lol. He's not the first poster to try it. ChuzLife pulled the same strategy years ago using abortion and it was as seethrough then as it is now.

yeah.. it's a bit misleading.... 2 different threads on 2 different subject, and you are playing it off like we are all in here conspiring and discussing taking out El Supremo.

you may be right about his motives... you may be wrong.... either way, you are off base throwing a fit over this thread.... there's nothing wrong with the thread.
 
yeah.. it's a bit misleading.... 2 different threads on 2 different subject,

Not at all. In one he argues Obama is a dictator trying to gain power, in another he argues that dictators should be killed before they gain more power. The connection is obvious and I'm not the only who saw it. The fact that you, famous for your adherence to lawlessness, is complaining that it was pointed out just seals it.

and you are playing it off like we are all in here conspiring and discussing taking out El Supremo.

Am I? I haven't even addressed your posts or anyone else's. I've addressed the OPs.

you may be right about his motives... you may be wrong.... either way, you are off base throwing a fit over this thread.... there's nothing wrong with the thread.

See Misterveritis' posts in this thread. :shrug:
 
Not at all. In one he argues Obama is a dictator trying to gain power, in another he argues that dictators should be killed before they gain more power. The connection is obvious and I'm not the only who saw it. The fact that you, famous for your adherence to lawlessness, is complaining that it was pointed out just seals it.

Am I? I haven't even addressed your posts or anyone else's. I've addressed the OPs.

See Misterveritis' posts in this thread. :shrug:
Yes. See mine. I call for lawful actions against a traitor. But I cannot make my case any further. It is not allowed.
 
Yes. See mine. I call for lawful actions against a traitor. But I cannot make my case any further. It is not allowed.

In a thread where the OP is in favor of the assassination of Hitler before he implemented his agenda, you compare Obama to Hitler. So subtle it fooled nobody. ;)
 
In a thread where the OP is in favor of the assassination of Hitler before he implemented his agenda, you compare Obama to Hitler. So subtle it fooled nobody. ;)
You may have a reading comprehension problem. I have done the opposite of what you claim. I call for the application of the law to Obama, not to assassination.

You give yourself way too much credit.
 
Not at all. In one he argues Obama is a dictator trying to gain power, in another he argues that dictators should be killed before they gain more power. The connection is obvious and I'm not the only who saw it. The fact that you, famous for your adherence to lawlessness, is complaining that it was pointed out just seals it.



Am I? I haven't even addressed your posts or anyone else's. I've addressed the OPs.



See Misterveritis' posts in this thread. :shrug:

famous for my adherence to lawlessness?.. oy vey, :lol:

I wasn't even in the other thread... so no.. it's not "obvious"...the other thread has exactly dick to do with this one.


if you are that worried, PM a mod or an admin... otherwise.. shush... keep your whining to yourself.
 
famous for my adherence to lawlessness?.. oy vey, :lol:

I wasn't even in the other thread... so no.. it's not "obvious"...the other thread has exactly dick to do with this one.


if you are that worried, PM a mod or an admin... otherwise.. shush... keep your whining to yourself.

I'll call them as I sees them, if you don't like it you don't have to respond to my posts. :shrug:
 
You may have a reading comprehension problem. I have done the opposite of what you claim. I call for the application of the law to Obama, not to assassination.

You give yourself way too much credit.

Somebody really likes being purposely obtuse.
 
Yes. See mine. I call for lawful actions against a traitor. But I cannot make my case any further. It is not allowed.

giphy-facebook_s.jpg
 

You gotta love it. They call Obama a dictator, compare him to Hitler, argue dictators should be killed before the create their agendas, then turn around and say they're not advocating Obama's assassination. Only at DP folks!
 
"You may have a reading comprehension problem. I have done the opposite of what you claim. I call for the application of the law to Obama, not assassination.

You give yourself way too much credit."
Somebody really likes being purposely obtuse.
Granted. You.
 
You gotta love it. They call Obama a dictator, compare him to Hitler, argue dictators should be killed before the create their agendas, then turn around and say they're not advocating Obama's assassination. Only at DP folks!
Many foolish people have difficulty following even simple arguments.

Mine is simple. Obama is a traitor. He has been waging war against the American citizen, the United States and the US Constitution. The lawful method for dealing with someone like Obama is to impeach him, then convict him and remove him from office. Once we have a real attorney general, we arrest him, charge him with treason and his other relevant crimes. Then he is tried. If convicted, and I hope he will be, we enter the all important punishment phase where we either put him on death row or we imprison him with no chance of parole for the next 50 years.

My approach follows the law. That may be why it is so difficult for you, and your friends in crime, to follow.

Moderate? LOL. I believe you lie to yourself.
 
Many foolish people have difficulty following even simple arguments.

Mine is simple. Obama is a traitor. He has been waging war against the American citizen, the United States and the US Constitution. The lawful method for dealing with someone like Obama is to impeach him, then convict him and remove him from office. Once we have a real attorney general, we arrest him, charge him with treason and his other relevant crimes. Then he is tried. If convicted, and I hope he will be, we enter the all important punishment phase where we either put him on death row or we imprison him with no chance of parole for the next 50 years.

My approach follows the law. That may be why it is so difficult for you, and your friends in crime, to follow.

Moderate? LOL. I believe you lie to yourself.

Yes, we know what your argument is. You repeat it ad nauseam. And it's utter nonsense.
 
Yes, we know what your argument is. You repeat it ad nauseam. And it's utter nonsense.
And at some point you will be wondering what happened. Yes, I know. Those who are born blind cannot imagine how others can see.
 
Many foolish people have difficulty following even simple arguments.

Mine is simple. Obama is a traitor. He has been waging war against the American citizen, the United States and the US Constitution. The lawful method for dealing with someone like Obama is to impeach him, then convict him and remove him from office. Once we have a real attorney general, we arrest him, charge him with treason and his other relevant crimes. Then he is tried. If convicted, and I hope he will be, we enter the all important punishment phase where we either put him on death row or we imprison him with no chance of parole for the next 50 years.

My approach follows the law. That may be why it is so difficult for you, and your friends in crime, to follow.

Moderate? LOL. I believe you lie to yourself.

:funny​
 
Sure.

I call for the assassination of my line of credit.
 
Kennedy tried to assassinate Castro

Kennedy also backed off the Bay of Pigs at the last moment. That's why most Cubans vote Republican, because they despise Kennedy. He gave the order for US military support to stand down, allowing Cubans attacking Fidel's forces to either be slaughtered or captured and imprisoned.

Some conspiracy theorists, as you probably know, think Fidel, along with the Ruskies, were involved in his assignation.
 
Last edited:
Assassination can also lead to world war. Remember Gavrilo Princip?
 
Back
Top Bottom