• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S. is Responsible for the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: Liberian Scientist

Is it possible the US is directly or indirectly behind this outbreak?


  • Total voters
    17
  • Poll closed .

DaveFagan

Iconoclast
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 20, 2011
Messages
10,090
Reaction score
5,056
Location
wny
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Best to read the article in its' entirety.

U.S. is Responsible for the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: Liberian Scientist

U.S. is Responsible for the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: Liberian Scientist | Global Research
"Dr. Cyril Broderick, A Liberian scientist and a former professor of Plant Pathology at the University of Liberia’s College of Agriculture and Forestry says the West, particularly the U.S. is responsible for the Ebola outbreak in West Africa. Dr. Broderick claims the following in an exclusive article published in the Daily Observer based in Monrovia, Liberia. He wrote the following:
The US Department of Defense (DoD) is funding Ebola trials on humans, trials which started just weeks before the Ebola outbreak in Guinea and Sierra Leone. The reports continue and state that the DoD gave a contract worth $140 million dollars to Tekmira, a Canadian pharmaceutical company, to conduct Ebola research. This research work involved injecting and infusing healthy humans with the deadly Ebola virus. Hence, the DoD is listed as a collaborator in a “First in Human” Ebola clinical trial (NCT02041715, which started in January 2014 shortly before an Ebola epidemic was declared in West Africa in March."snip
"
Is it possible that the United States Department of Defense (DOD) and other Western countries are directly responsible for infecting Africans with the Ebola virus? Dr. Broderick claims that the U.S. government has a research laboratory located in a town called Kenema in Sierra Leone that studies what he calls “viral fever bioterrorism”, It is also the town where he acknowledges that is the “epicentre of the Ebola outbreak in West Africa.” Is it a fact? Is Dr. Broderick a conspiracy theorist? He says that “there is urgent need for affirmative action in protecting the less affluent of poorer countries, especially African citizens, whose countries are not as scientifically and industrially endowed as the United States and most Western countries, sources of most viral or bacterial GMOs that are strategically designed as biological weapons.” He also asks an important question when he says “It is most disturbing that the U. S. Government has been operating a viral hemorrhagic fever bioterrorism research laboratory in Sierra Leone. Are there others?”



How did Zaire/Ebola get to West Africa from about 3,500km away?

Why do we have Bio-Weapons labs in Liberia and Sierra Leone?

Why has the Obama administration dispatched troops to Liberia when they have no training to provide medical treatment to dying Africans?

There is a lot of circumstantial evidence in the story, and a precedent.

Who do you trust?

Is it possible the US is directly or indirectly behind this outbreak?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't trust our government but then I have to ask myself - would our DoD with this president allow human trials out in the open in Western Africa? My conclusion is no. Not in a million years. Now if this was a weapon used version that somehow got out of a lab somewhere - sure that's totally plausible but no way as this alleged doctor says.
 
I find it difficult to even consider that the US might be behind this. On the other hand, it is long established that the US Intelligence Agencies seem to operate independently of the US politcal Administrations. Rogue Agencies are operating or we would not be supporting "moderate rebels/terrorists" in Syria, Libya, Egypt, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc. The US actions in these Nations and Ukraine seem to imply no limits to the skullduggery practiced in the name of State diplomacy. I have observed bureaucratic ignorance observing the CDC reactions to the Dallas Ebola outbreak and if they are involved in Liberia how could a cluster&^%$ be avoided?
 
Unless more is discovered on this, it makes little to no sense for the US to cause an outbreak that ended up landing on our shores to deal with. From a historical standpoint it does make sense as the US has done plenty to many along these lines. But ebola being US caused? Not sure I can buy that one just yet.
 
Why has the Obama administration dispatched troops to Liberia when they have no training to provide medical treatment to dying Africans?
They're not there to treat ebola patients directly.

Who do you trust?
Not Global Research :lol:
Is it possible the US is directly or indirectly behind this outbreak?

Is it possible that Guatemala is directly or indirectly behind this outbreak? The answer to both is yes, but people who aren't conspiracy theorists don't deal with far-fetched possibilities but actual facts and evidence from reputable sources. Most of the article deals with something that happened almost seventy years ago.
 
Last edited:
Best to read the article in its' entirety.

U.S. is Responsible for the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: Liberian Scientist

U.S. is Responsible for the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: Liberian Scientist | Global Research


How did Zaire/Ebola get to West Africa from about 3,500km away?

Why do we have Bio-Weapons labs in Liberia and Sierra Leone?

Why has the Obama administration dispatched troops to Liberia when they have no training to provide medical treatment to dying Africans?

There is a lot of circumstantial evidence in the story, and a precedent.

Who do you trust?

Is it possible the US is directly or indirectly behind this outbreak?
[/INDENT]



I'll never believe that without a lot of ironclad proof.

Why would the USA spread a disease that could potentially kill millions of Americans?
 
Best to read the article in its' entirety.

U.S. is Responsible for the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: Liberian Scientist

U.S. is Responsible for the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: Liberian Scientist | Global Research


How did Zaire/Ebola get to West Africa from about 3,500km away?

Why do we have Bio-Weapons labs in Liberia and Sierra Leone?

Why has the Obama administration dispatched troops to Liberia when they have no training to provide medical treatment to dying Africans?

There is a lot of circumstantial evidence in the story, and a precedent.

Who do you trust?

Is it possible the US is directly or indirectly behind this outbreak?

[/INDENT]

I picked other.Yes the government experimented of people in other countries and yes our government even experimented on people in this country. Most likely they are still experimenting on people today and hopefully one these days these evil vile people are dragged out into the street and killed in the manner similar to how Muammar Gaddafi was killed.But we have no evidence to indicate that they are doing this in west Africa.

Unethical human experimentation in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
I'll never believe that without a lot of ironclad proof.

Why would the USA spread a disease that could potentially kill millions of Americans?


Think of a rogue Agency as opposed to USA policy. Not that any of our agencies would break the law, eh? CIA and torture. NSA and wholesale eavesdropping on our private conversations. Nowhere does the article accuse the USA of doing this as policy, but the Bio-Weapons labs exist and the Ebola strain is Zaire. Accidents do happen, both large and small. We haven't even touched upon the possibilities of stupidity.
 
I'll never believe that without a lot of ironclad proof.

Why would the USA spread a disease that could potentially kill millions of Americans?

Here's a little info that is revealing as regards matters of germ warfare, etc.
"I found two British scientists who had been employed at Iraq’s top secret Salman Pak chemical and biowarfare laboratory near Baghdad. The Brits confided to me they were part of a large technical team secretly organized and “seconded” to Iraq in the mid-1980’s by the British government and the MI6 Secret Intelligence Service. Their goal was to develop and “weaponize” anthrax, plague, botulism and other pathogens for use as tactical germ weapons.

The US and Saudi Arabia feared Iran’s Islamic revolution would sweep the Mideast and overthrow its oil monarchs. So Washington and its Arab allies convinced Iraq’s president, Saddam Hussein, to invade Iran and overthrow its new government. Arms and money flowed to Iraq from the US, Britain, Kuwait and the Saudis.

After three years of WWI-style warfare, Iraq found its outnumbered troops could not stop Iranian human-wave attacks. Iran was slowly winning its bloody war against Iraq.

So the US and Britain supplied Saddam Hussein with chemical and biological weapons to break the waves of attacking Iranians. Chemical warfare manufacturing equipment – disguised as insecticide plants – came from Germany, France and Holland. The feed stock for the germ weapons came from a US laboratory in Maryland –approved by the US government.

Over 500,000 soldiers and civilians died in the eight-year Iran-Iraq conflict. To this day, Iran blames the US and the Saudis for instigating the war and causing some 250,000 Iranian casualties.

By contrast, in the Anglo-American view, chemical and biological weapons were fine – so long as used to kill Muslim Iranians. Used against westerners, they would be denounced as “terrorism.” In 2013, US President Barack Obama threatened Syria with war over unfounded claims that Damascus planned to use chemical weapons on US-backed insurgents."



  The Real Secret of Iraq's Germ Weapons:  Information Clearing House - ICH
 
No with no further comment necessary.
 
No.

Just no.

There are times to blame us and times not to, this situation is the latter. It ain't our fault at all.

I hope this clown enjoys his 15 minutes of fame amongst the truthers and conspiracy nuts while he can.
 
They're not there to treat ebola patients directly.


Not Global Research :lol:


Is it possible that Guatemala is directly or indirectly behind this outbreak? The answer to both is yes, but people who aren't conspiracy theorists don't deal with far-fetched possibilities but actual facts and evidence from reputable sources. Most of the article deals with something that happened almost seventy years ago.

U.S. Human Experiments you mean? Some were going on in the 70's and 80's too. And President Clinton admitted that radiation experiments had been conducted on unsuspecting people. And what you said about conspiracy theorists also threw religious people under the bus, just replace CT with 'religious people'. So, don't you feel special way up there on your perch now, you know, since you just condemned more than half of the human population to stupidity.
 
The Liberian doctor is more than likely wrong. However, the possibility does exist. Governments have done awful things with awful things many, many times in our collective history.
 
The Liberian doctor is more than likely wrong. However, the possibility does exist. Governments have done awful things with awful things many, many times in our collective history.


Yes! That is the point, and a liitle proof provided with collective history to back it up. Those that categorically state NO!, truly mean, I hope NO!, because they believe in the White House on the Hill propaganda as fact.
 
Best to read the article in its' entirety.

U.S. is Responsible for the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: Liberian Scientist

U.S. is Responsible for the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: Liberian Scientist | Global Research


How did Zaire/Ebola get to West Africa from about 3,500km away?

Why do we have Bio-Weapons labs in Liberia and Sierra Leone?

Why has the Obama administration dispatched troops to Liberia when they have no training to provide medical treatment to dying Africans?

There is a lot of circumstantial evidence in the story, and a precedent.

Who do you trust?

Is it possible the US is directly or indirectly behind this outbreak?

[/INDENT]

Nothing like a BS blame the US article with absolutely no proof what so ever. It is nothing but crap.
Oh and our intelligence agencies do not operate outside of political oversight. You are just making things up.
How about you move this to the conspiracy section where it belongs.
 
The Liberian doctor is more than likely wrong. However, the possibility does exist. Governments have done awful things with awful things many, many times in our collective history.

Yes! That is the point, and a liitle proof provided with collective history to back it up. Those that categorically state NO!, truly mean, I hope NO!, because they believe in the White House on the Hill propaganda as fact.

I love this! The point isn't whether the accusations are actually true or not, the point is zOMG EBIL US GOVERNMENT AND STUPID SHEEPLE!!11!!! :lamo
 
I love this! The point isn't whether the accusations are actually true or not, the point is zOMG EBIL US GOVERNMENT AND STUPID SHEEPLE!!11!!! :lamo

No, not even close. The question was asked if it is possible. Apparently you do not know what 'possible' means.
 
No, not even close. The question was asked if it is possible. Apparently you do not know what 'possible' means.

I do know what possible means. But as I said before, "possible" doesn't matter, because almost anything is possible. Yes, it is possible that the US started the Ebola outbreak. It is also theoretically possible that it was started by ISIS, Russia, Guatemala, Coca-Cola, Global Research, DaveFagan, and pretty much anyone. If there is no evidence that something that is "possible" is also "true" or even "likely," then the only discussion of said "possibility" will be had by people who already have their own opinion on the matter. Only people who already think that the US government is sinister are talking about the far-fetched possibility of the US having started this Ebola epidemic.
 
I do know what possible means. But as I said before, "possible" doesn't matter, because almost anything is possible. Yes, it is possible that the US started the Ebola outbreak. It is also theoretically possible that it was started by ISIS, Russia, Guatemala, Coca-Cola, Global Research, DaveFagan, and pretty much anyone. If there is no evidence that something that is "possible" is also "true" or even "likely," then the only discussion of said "possibility" will be had by people who already have their own opinion on the matter. Only people who already think that the US government is sinister are talking about the far-fetched possibility of the US having started this Ebola epidemic.

And now you apparently cannot read either. But please, keep blindly accusing me of things I've never said nor implied. Besides, the U.S. can handle theorizing. It is not small nor weak. You can safely remove your flag lapel, trust me ;)
 
I do know what possible means. But as I said before, "possible" doesn't matter, because almost anything is possible. Yes, it is possible that the US started the Ebola outbreak. It is also theoretically possible that it was started by ISIS, Russia, Guatemala, Coca-Cola, Global Research, DaveFagan, and pretty much anyone. If there is no evidence that something that is "possible" is also "true" or even "likely," then the only discussion of said "possibility" will be had by people who already have their own opinion on the matter. Only people who already think that the US government is sinister are talking about the far-fetched possibility of the US having started this Ebola epidemic.

I don't know about ISIS or Russia, but I don't have any Bio-Weapons labs in Liberia and I don't have any patents on vaccines against Ebola developed using Ebola viruses. Do you know of any research in that area?
 
Back
Top Bottom