why do conservatives/libertarians give more money away then socialists. YOu continue to talk out of your six as to me. You are just making stuff up hoping you are right. what sort of felony did you get popped for
and tell me-where did the federal government get the power to start the war on drugs?
Well first off they don't. That was based on a false data set that only asked about social conservatism. (a thing I don't think you would fall into, but many libs do) cons "donations" are also usually false charity's that do very little to no good for the common man. places like churches, organizations like Cato and heritage, or crazy pro lifers. Libs are more likely to give to things that do more good like tsunami relief funds or secular organizations that actually pass on a majority of the money to the poor in the form of food, clothes, blankets, etc... Also cons tend to have more money, and therefore more to give... Don't believe me? Fine believe MIT
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2148033
Second wtf is a six? Your the one that is throwing ish against the wall and seeing if it sticks, like arguing against Merriam Webster definition of "starving" I am giving you facts I have read elsewhere that can easily be found again. I am also using critical thinking, something that confounds most lawyers (they don't expect it) and most of the pop seems to lack greatly. I have not made up a thing and have sources to back it, if i dont know i research so i do. Can you say the same? Where is your source for starving only means to death huh? Or why do you still have the dated notion that cons give more then libs when at face value its equal and when it comes to real good libs give wayyyyyyy more and less selfishly (ie not donating to a church or organization that is pretty sure to help you more than others)
From Nixon, and the supreme court... FDR passed a bill to try to govern commerce, and gave the federal gov more power in doing so. Nixon (and the supreme court) falsely interpreted the law to allow them to pass drug prohibition. A good analogy would be how Obama falsely used the patriot act to do all sorts of dirty ish (before he passed ndaa) that the writers of the patriot act never intended.... (in fact they said so) At worst fdr was negligent in his writing, not complicit as you would imply. Oh and Obamas a centrist/corporatist real liberalism is all but dead.
Manufacturing/delivery felony
2 misdamenor possession charges... I had a lil keif n weed for me n my friends to smoke in with the lb....
I could have fought it, they had no probable cause to pull me, (other than being white in a neighborhood where white ppl buy dope ie heroine NOT weed) but then if my motion to dismiss failed I would have had to spend allot more on defense (which would have came out of my savings to move/start a business) plus you can't grow for commercial purposes with a felony where I'm gonna move anyway, and I did not wanna take that risk... Treatment court ensures they expunge as long as I keep my nose clean for two years and I will... Can move after one... I don't even touch the **** no mo or have it in my presence... I still sell it tho
Plus I think I have a new organic hydro method I invented I could write a book on, so I don't necessarily need allot of plants to make allot of money (you can grow 4 with a med card where I'm goin, n they don't care about F's for that)
Its cool I don't mind not smoking, the worst thing is I would have moved already n the whole ordeal cost me 4300 between the loss of pot n lawyer.... Kinda sucks going to groups with crackheads n dopefeinds too but what evs...
They enrolled me in drug court of their own accord because I am white... Gawd the system is racist but the racism sort of helped me in this case... Well and hurt me if I were black they wouldn't of pulled me in the first place..
Oh well live n learn...