what are your thoughts?
No matter how much the Republicans would like for the Benghazi story to hurt Hillary, I don't think it's going to. I also believe that the only way Hillary won't be our next President is if she decides not to run. And it looks like she is going to run.:2wave:
.Before one votes the question needs to be asked do you want a liar and cheat as your president? I.
Dubya can't run.
Sounds like your a big Hillary fan Amanda...Before one votes the question needs to be asked do you want a liar and cheat as your president? If that does not bother you then by all means vote for Hillary.
Did you figure that out all by yourself or did someone have to help you.:lamo
I am not agreeing with you.
But for arguments sake, there are many things much worse than a liar and many things much worse than a cheat.
Bush for example, was a liar that caused the deaths of over 100,000 human beings.
McCain has visions of the world on fire in his eyes.
Romney was merely a corporate shill.
If Clinton is indeed a liar or a cheat, you'd still have to show me something better to get me to not vote for her.
Married for 48 years my left wing friend.
They do have a vision, only it requires people to work for a living. Pay taxes and stay out of trouble.
But like I said, four murdered Americans, who cares. In this country it just gets in the way of liberal narrative.
Policy how to get there? How about some hard work after getting an education.Everyone has that vision. The visions of some are even loftier and more eloquent than that.. .. and, what you are articulating is a vision of a "promised land" not a vision of policy on how to get there, which your party lacks.
Government officials and their armed body guards killed in a combat zone are not classified as being "murdered", nor are the more than 100 other American's that were killed on the job in the several dozen attacks on US embassies and consulates in the past 35 years.
Attacks on U.S. diplomatic facilities - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
...obsessing over Benghazi as something unusual or scandalous is right out of the Con narrative... cause, back to my original point, "they got nuttin'"
Policy how to get there? How about some hard work after getting an education.
Oh, and we are not talking about other attacks on consulates and embassies. We are talking about this one. The lies are really the issue. The fact that it happened is part of life. But its the LIES.
You are starting to sound like a student that failed to do their homework and are just providing answers from their A.... not your fault, you have no material to work with as, I have already pointed, the Cons have no platform; no vision. You have to create one.
Nothing unique about Benghazi... it is just another attack on a US facility in a conflict zone.... its just the Cons trying to make something out of nothing because, as I have already pointed out and you have confirmed, they have no vision for America. Thanks for playing along. Neither Dan Rowan nor Dean Martin played the straight man roles as well.
You are starting to sound like a student that failed to do their homework and are just providing answers from their A.... not your fault, you have no material to work with as, I have already pointed, the Cons have no platform; no vision. You have to create one.
Nothing unique about Benghazi... it is just another attack on a US facility in a conflict zone.... its just the Cons trying to make something out of nothing because, as I have already pointed out and you have confirmed, they have no vision for America. Thanks for playing along. Neither Dan Rowan nor Dean Martin played the straight man roles as well.
what are your thoughts?
The unique thing is Obama and Hillary lied and tried to cover it up blaming it on a video and four brave Americans died for political reasons...........This is 10 time worse then Watergate.....No one died there.
The unique thing is Obama and Hillary lied and tried to cover it up blaming it on a video and four brave Americans died for political reasons...........This is 10 time worse then Watergate.....No one died there.
You have your cause-effect relationship wrong. The four Americans were killed before anyone in the WH tried to blame it on a video. Regardless of how it was spun after the fact, trying to blame it on a video was not what killed the four Americans. The Americans were killed by terrorists, not by the spin that happened AFTER the fact.
This is what the OVERWHELMING majority of the nation understands except right-wing extremists, and it is why nobody gives a flying f...k to your supposed Benghazi scandal.
By the way, deaths in American embassies and consulates happened 13 times during the Bush administration.
Everybody else is sick and tired of your Benghazi rhetoric which will have ZERO influence over the elections since no sane person who is not a right-wing extremist takes this as you guys do, and you guys wouldn't ever vote for a Democrat anyway.
Stop beating a dead horse.
The difference is my left wing friend is President Bush did not to cover it up...He did not send his Secretary of State to the funeral of one of the dead Americans and have her tell the mother of one of the dead Americans that we will get the people who made that video nor did President Bush sent his National Security advisor to all the talk shows and blame it on a video, nor did Presient Bush go in front of the UN and blame any deaths on a video.........You got that my far out left wing friend?
How is the spin responsible for the deaths?
The spin is political process which all parties use.
You want spin? Look at the "Mission Accomplished" gaffe and go tell all the families of the soldiers who died after that, that they died for nothing since the mission had already been accomplished.
By the way, I'm not a far out left wing person. I'm a case in point to show that even the more moderate and independent voters don't buy your Benghazi BS.
what are your thoughts?