• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who should be embarrassed by the drunken Palin brawl the most?

This is embarassing for:

  • Total voters
    47
vesper said:
Well of course they are and Palin or any Conservative women are some of their favorites to bash. This party they attended as a family, was in the afternoon where many of the guests and their families were members of the same club. It wasn't like a family affair full of relatives and friends or a political affair where all the people attending are your supporters. The left has done a bang up job of demeaning Palin's kids in the press to late night television with tasteless jokes. From the stories commenting their little brother should have been aborted because he was disabled, to Bristol being a slut because as a teen got pregnant. And Willow even as a young girl had sexual slurs made toward her. They have had to put up with a lot of hurtful baseless things said about their mother as well. Did you watch the video at ABC where Stephoncrapfulus and his female co hosts were salivating over the details provided them from a dang political blog that had not yet been verified?
Click to expand...

All of this as they hide behind a "war on women".
 
Wiggen said:
Really? I didn't know that!

Hardly the point, is it?
Click to expand...

That is the point.

You keep bringing up something that did not happen.
 
Let's all wait for the cell phone footage taken by partygoers to be launched on TMZ. Harvey pays well.
 
Wiggen said:
Oh. OK. Thanks for the always valuable foreign perspective on American elections.:lamo
Click to expand...

You're welcome - and thank you for the ever predictable response when someone doesn't bow to your superior wisdom.
 
Crosscheck said:
This is a great post where at first you attack others for and then proceed to give your interpretation when everyone arrived for the party and what that the fight was about.

The only question is why were the Palins asked to leave the party if they were the innocent attendees.
Click to expand...

The OP set the poll up with a bias through reading more into the article than what was there. There is no evidence that the Palin kids were under the influence. There is no evidence that they instigated the ordeal. I simply gave another example of what could of occurred. No one is denying that there was a fight. The real question should be what/who provoked it?
 
Last edited:
US Conservative said:
All of this as they hide behind a "war on women".
Click to expand...

Absolutely, the crap the left has spewed about Palin and her children, had been toward some female on the left, it would have been viewed as criminal.
 
vesper said:
The OP set the poll up with a bias through reading more into the article than what was there. There is no evidence that the Palin kids were under the influence. There is no evidence that they instigated the ordeal. I simply gave another example of what could of occurred. No one is denying that there was a fight. The real question should be what/who provoked it?
Click to expand...

You just can't rant about others "reading between the lines" and then turn around and do it yourself. It just cracked me up.
 
cpwill said:
So, to be clear, we are now retreating from the position that "Obama did not blame ATM's for unemployment" to "okay, he did, but not for all unemployment"... ?
Click to expand...

No, I am not. And anyone with an ounce of common sense would not get that out of:

"He cited a couple of examples. Do you not think that he thinks there is more?"

Jeepers, CP... think. Don't let hackery prelude your thoughts. :roll:



Oh. So, you saw an opportunity to get in a ding at Bush, and are now irritated that someone saw an opportunity to get in a ding at Obama?
Click to expand...

Like I said, I saw an opportunity to retort with something clever, so I did. And if you look at the quote I cited, you'll see that the dig was first thrown towards Obama. Of course you remained silent


Naturally. Sneering at those lowbrow folk who don't think like us, clinging to their sky-god and their boomsticks is one of the ways in which the Left assures itself that it is morally superior. When Rush goes off on one of his crass riffs about "Moochelle Obama", everyone sniffs about how Family Is Supposed To Be Off-Limits; but oh! We can engage in some Self-Affirmation by denigrating a conservative womans' family? Delightful! :roll:
Click to expand...

When Michelle Obama and kids get their own retarded reality show and become attention whores of immense proportions, then yeah, call 'em whatever ya want. And Michelle is not off-limits as you know.... there's NEVER been a more hated first lady when it comes to the rabid right.
 
Crosscheck said:
You just can't rant about others "reading between the lines" and then turn around and do it yourself. It just cracked me up.
Click to expand...
Well I'm glad you got a chuckle, not all is lost. :) However, if the OP is going to set up a thread with such a slant making judgments without proof, the standard had been set. To give common sense rebuttal of a scenario that could be just as likely on the information given is fair. And if you go back and read my original post I stated we don't know why Bristol Palin gave some guy a right hook to the jaw.
 
vesper said:
Well I'm glad you got a chuckle, not all is lost. :) However, if the OP is going to set up a thread with such a slant making judgments without proof, the standard had been set. To give common sense rebuttal of a scenario that could be just as likely on the information given is fair. And if you go back and read my original post I stated we don't know why Bristol Palin gave some guy a right hook to the jaw.
Click to expand...

Nobody knows for certain what started the fracas. So almost everyone here is putting there own thought out scenario. The only thing we seem to know is that the Palins were at a party and a fight ensued. Then the Palins were all asked to leave. I don't want to "read between the lines" but it is usually the trouble makers who are asked to leave.

But I am waiting for the cell phone video to come out.
 
Crosscheck said:
Nobody knows for certain what started the fracas. So almost everyone here is putting there own thought out scenario. The only thing we seem to know is that the Palins were at a party and a fight ensued. Then the Palins were all asked to leave. I don't want to "read between the lines" but it is usually the trouble makers who are asked to leave.

But I am waiting for the cell phone video to come out.
Click to expand...

That's what a blog reported and just about every left wing news group is making hay of it being very careful to use the word "alleged". Look, being members of a snowmobile club doesn't mean everyone in attendance are fans of the Palins including the one hosting the party for the club members. If there is a cell phone video, I'd love to see it as long as it has audio too.
 
US Conservative said:
And lets not forget that the left completely ignored the Bush girls. :doh
Click to expand...

At least the Obama girls haven't engaged in alcohol-related offenses as Bush's daughter was.

Oh, wait - I forgot - if the Republican president's daughter does something, then the Democratic president's daughter must be doing the same thing, huh?
 
Mason66 said:
Show where anybody anywhere pounds (your word not mine) on Obama's daughters.
Click to expand...

Not sure what you mean, but back in I recall 2008 "letting his chidren attend Trinity United" and "He let Jerimiah Wright baptize his daughters" were regular champaign talking points. I recall Celsea Clinton, who was only a little girl at the time being refered to as "ugly" by one prominent pundit on the right when Bill Clinton was Potus.
 
Smeagol said:
Not sure what you mean, but back in I recall 2008 "letting his chidren attend Trinity United" and "He let Jerimiah Wright baptize his daughters" were regular champaign talking points. I recall Celsea Clinton, who was only a little girl at the time being refered to as "ugly" by one prominent pundit on the right when Bill Clinton was Potus.
Click to expand...

Just because the kids were mentioned doesn't mean they were being attacked.

Don't you see a difference?
 
Middleground said:
No, I am not. And anyone with an ounce of common sense would not get that out of:

"He cited a couple of examples. Do you not think that he thinks there is more?"

Jeepers, CP... think. Don't let hackery prelude your thoughts. :roll:
Click to expand...

.....tell me again about how it took Obama 6 years to list all the reasons that Bush was responsible for all of his economic troubles? :)

Like I said, I saw an opportunity to retort with something clever, so I did.
Click to expand...

Oh. You mean sort of like how you then got irritated at me for doing? :)

When Michelle Obama and kids get their own retarded reality show and become attention whores of immense proportions, then yeah, call 'em whatever ya want. And Michelle is not off-limits as you know.... there's NEVER been a more hated first lady when it comes to the rabid right.
Click to expand...

That is incorrect - Hillary Clinton tried to steer policy. Remember the "Co-President" "Two-for-the-price-of-one" thing? Way more disliked than Michelle, who mostly sparks irritation for living lavishly on the public dime in a time of economic hardship.
 
cpwill said:
So, to be clear, we are now retreating from the position that "Obama did not blame ATM's for unemployment" to "okay, he did, but not for all unemployment"... ?



Oh. So, you saw an opportunity to get in a ding at Bush, and are now irritated that someone saw an opportunity to get in a ding at Obama?



Naturally. Sneering at those lowbrow folk who don't think like us, clinging to their sky-god and their boomsticks is one of the ways in which the Left assures itself that it is morally superior. When Rush goes off on one of his crass riffs about "Moochelle Obama", everyone sniffs about how Family Is Supposed To Be Off-Limits; but oh! We can engage in some Self-Affirmation by denigrating a conservative womans' family? Delightful! :roll:
Click to expand...

The difference is that Rush is actually denigrating, with childish names and exaggerated stories.

With Palin, it's just a straight up news story, and all the wingnuts complain that we are trashing her and her family....
 
Navy Pride said:
You lefties just like to jump on Palin...Here is a clue for you......she is not runing for any office.
Click to expand...

Will she rune for any office in the future? ;)
 
vesper said:
The OP set the poll up with a bias through reading more into the article than what was there. There is no evidence that the Palin kids were under the influence. There is no evidence that they instigated the ordeal. I simply gave another example of what could of occurred. No one is denying that there was a fight. The real question should be what/who provoked it?
Click to expand...

Odd that the Palins haven't commented, eh?

Oh. According to you that must mean they weren't there, or that they only showed up to collect alms for the poor, or maybe to recruit people for their habitat for humanity mission trip.
 
Glen Contrarian said:
At least the Obama girls haven't engaged in alcohol-related offenses as Bush's daughter was.

Oh, wait - I forgot - if the Republican president's daughter does something, then the Democratic president's daughter must be doing the same thing, huh?
Click to expand...

Give them some time, I expect Obama's daughters wont be perfect. Liberals will draw a line in the sand and state its not virtuous to mention. Why after the contradictory history of the left? Because they say so.
 
cpwill said:
Way more disliked than Michelle, who mostly sparks irritation for living lavishly on the public dime in a time of economic hardship.
Click to expand...

Which is ludicrous, if you ask me. Nancy Reagan lived just as "lavishly" as Michelle Obama does, and nobody cared. It's rank hypocrisy for you guys to get pissy about it now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom