- Joined
- Jun 18, 2011
- Messages
- 15,440
- Reaction score
- 6,043
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
You can keep saying that but McCain is still alive and in good health.
Really? I didn't know that!
Hardly the point, is it?
You can keep saying that but McCain is still alive and in good health.
Well of course they are and Palin or any Conservative women are some of their favorites to bash. This party they attended as a family, was in the afternoon where many of the guests and their families were members of the same club. It wasn't like a family affair full of relatives and friends or a political affair where all the people attending are your supporters. The left has done a bang up job of demeaning Palin's kids in the press to late night television with tasteless jokes. From the stories commenting their little brother should have been aborted because he was disabled, to Bristol being a slut because as a teen got pregnant. And Willow even as a young girl had sexual slurs made toward her. They have had to put up with a lot of hurtful baseless things said about their mother as well. Did you watch the video at ABC where Stephoncrapfulus and his female co hosts were salivating over the details provided them from a dang political blog that had not yet been verified?
Really? I didn't know that!
Hardly the point, is it?
This is true. The lefts' vilest invective is reserved for those whom they think they have a natural right to, but who wander off the plantation and start thinking for themselves.
Oh. OK. Thanks for the always valuable foreign perspective on American elections.:lamo
Show where anybody anywhere pounds (your word not mine) on Obama's daughters.
This is a great post where at first you attack others for and then proceed to give your interpretation when everyone arrived for the party and what that the fight was about.
The only question is why were the Palins asked to leave the party if they were the innocent attendees.
All of this as they hide behind a "war on women".
The OP set the poll up with a bias through reading more into the article than what was there. There is no evidence that the Palin kids were under the influence. There is no evidence that they instigated the ordeal. I simply gave another example of what could of occurred. No one is denying that there was a fight. The real question should be what/who provoked it?
So, to be clear, we are now retreating from the position that "Obama did not blame ATM's for unemployment" to "okay, he did, but not for all unemployment"... ?
Oh. So, you saw an opportunity to get in a ding at Bush, and are now irritated that someone saw an opportunity to get in a ding at Obama?
Naturally. Sneering at those lowbrow folk who don't think like us, clinging to their sky-god and their boomsticks is one of the ways in which the Left assures itself that it is morally superior. When Rush goes off on one of his crass riffs about "Moochelle Obama", everyone sniffs about how Family Is Supposed To Be Off-Limits; but oh! We can engage in some Self-Affirmation by denigrating a conservative womans' family? Delightful! :roll:
Well I'm glad you got a chuckle, not all is lost. However, if the OP is going to set up a thread with such a slant making judgments without proof, the standard had been set. To give common sense rebuttal of a scenario that could be just as likely on the information given is fair. And if you go back and read my original post I stated we don't know why Bristol Palin gave some guy a right hook to the jaw.You just can't rant about others "reading between the lines" and then turn around and do it yourself. It just cracked me up.
Well I'm glad you got a chuckle, not all is lost. However, if the OP is going to set up a thread with such a slant making judgments without proof, the standard had been set. To give common sense rebuttal of a scenario that could be just as likely on the information given is fair. And if you go back and read my original post I stated we don't know why Bristol Palin gave some guy a right hook to the jaw.
Nobody knows for certain what started the fracas. So almost everyone here is putting there own thought out scenario. The only thing we seem to know is that the Palins were at a party and a fight ensued. Then the Palins were all asked to leave. I don't want to "read between the lines" but it is usually the trouble makers who are asked to leave.
But I am waiting for the cell phone video to come out.
And lets not forget that the left completely ignored the Bush girls. :doh
Absolutely, the crap the left has spewed about Palin and her children, had been toward some female on the left, it would have been viewed as criminal.
Show where anybody anywhere pounds (your word not mine) on Obama's daughters.
Not sure what you mean, but back in I recall 2008 "letting his chidren attend Trinity United" and "He let Jerimiah Wright baptize his daughters" were regular champaign talking points. I recall Celsea Clinton, who was only a little girl at the time being refered to as "ugly" by one prominent pundit on the right when Bill Clinton was Potus.
No, I am not. And anyone with an ounce of common sense would not get that out of:
"He cited a couple of examples. Do you not think that he thinks there is more?"
Jeepers, CP... think. Don't let hackery prelude your thoughts. :roll:
Like I said, I saw an opportunity to retort with something clever, so I did.
When Michelle Obama and kids get their own retarded reality show and become attention whores of immense proportions, then yeah, call 'em whatever ya want. And Michelle is not off-limits as you know.... there's NEVER been a more hated first lady when it comes to the rabid right.
So, to be clear, we are now retreating from the position that "Obama did not blame ATM's for unemployment" to "okay, he did, but not for all unemployment"... ?
Oh. So, you saw an opportunity to get in a ding at Bush, and are now irritated that someone saw an opportunity to get in a ding at Obama?
Naturally. Sneering at those lowbrow folk who don't think like us, clinging to their sky-god and their boomsticks is one of the ways in which the Left assures itself that it is morally superior. When Rush goes off on one of his crass riffs about "Moochelle Obama", everyone sniffs about how Family Is Supposed To Be Off-Limits; but oh! We can engage in some Self-Affirmation by denigrating a conservative womans' family? Delightful! :roll:
You lefties just like to jump on Palin...Here is a clue for you......she is not runing for any office.
The OP set the poll up with a bias through reading more into the article than what was there. There is no evidence that the Palin kids were under the influence. There is no evidence that they instigated the ordeal. I simply gave another example of what could of occurred. No one is denying that there was a fight. The real question should be what/who provoked it?
At least the Obama girls haven't engaged in alcohol-related offenses as Bush's daughter was.
Oh, wait - I forgot - if the Republican president's daughter does something, then the Democratic president's daughter must be doing the same thing, huh?
Way more disliked than Michelle, who mostly sparks irritation for living lavishly on the public dime in a time of economic hardship.