• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should the US Attack AQ and ISIS on the Anniversary of 911?

Should the US Attack AQ and ISIS on the Anniversary of 911?


  • Total voters
    19
Wrong again
Which from the beginning I have stated its not just our problem. \
Its everybody's problem.

who is everybody--where was Congress while your President was overseas--golfing, fund-raising and back-stabbing Obama on foreign soil.
So save all that BS.....and just accept when your man BO puts his own feet into his mouth, and then starts doing the double talk and the Flip-Flop and Fry.
You save your BS--this is where you people go when you're trying to damn the President during a time of war.
Get use to it......as you will be seeing plenty of it for his last 2 years.

Thanks for playing politics with War.
It will be easy to debunk your BS over the next eight weeks as you see the election slip away from the negative GOP tractics .
 
Apparently MMC doersn't understand what the number 435 means--eh bro.
You do know that 435 includes both parties, don't you MMC ?
Next .
Nah as usual, what we see is Nimby always taking things out of context so he can throw up some smack on the GOP and the Right. The Norm.

But as usual Nimby forgot about all those Demos that want the lights turned on and the Cockroaches cleaned out too.
 
You didn't say other countries--poor attempt to deflect.

Telling me I'm confused is another poor attempt to deflect from YOUR "strategy" of putting
American boots should be on the ground, dying, and then you'd blame Obama for that.



Wrong again Nimby.... I have said it in several threads concerning terrorists. Also in ME threads and Some of the Breaking News threads over these fools. Where you are like kind of light with any type input.

Which all who hang out in International Politics already has seen it so. So no matter how much You try to lie......it just wont work this time around.

Now to bust you for your lie.....produce the link where I said the US has to put troops on the ground to go take on these Terrorists.

You just been called on your BS.....now Produce the link. I'll Wait?
waiting.gif
 
Apparently MMC doersn't understand what the number 435 means--eh bro.
You do know that 435 includes both parties, don't you MMC ?
Next .

Produce the link Nimby, where I said the US has to put troops on the ground. Don't try to deflect and go tangential. Stay Focused and produce that link
 
personally instead of screwing around I'd send a couple nukes, check to see if everything was decimated, and move on with our lives.

Your young and forgiven!
 
Mornin RDS. :2wave: The US has not set the level of Threat at its Highest Alert.....I would disagree. We have sat back for 12 years always waiting to hear from these Terrorists. Why should we keep waiting. How about us taking to the Offense that day without a any doubt. So that going forward on 911.....the Terrorists knows.....Death is coming for them by way of the American People. Who they just cannot Intimidate. No matter how hard the fools try.

I think its high time we take the Fight to them.....Hit them in 4 or 5 Countries. Hit them at the break of day. All our People capable to do so. Intel and Military as well as anyone else that can take one out. Let them wake to a New Age.....which will be without them.

For twelve years we've been busy creating power vacuums for which these militant Islamic groups could flourish. Your poll hasn't enough voting options.
 
For twelve years we've been busy creating power vacuums for which these militant Islamic groups could flourish. Your poll hasn't enough voting options.

It has exactly the options it needs Monte. Do you think an Enemy like these Terrorists should be given a break. Yes or No. There isn't any other answers. Does one always give their enemy a chance to not lose?
 
What don't you get about other countries putting people on the ground.....What don't you get about other countries being involved? Were you still confused. If we are using airstrikes then let them put their own people on the ground. It is clear you have no idea about strategy or tactics. Nor getting a coalition to do some of their own dirty work.
Let me know which of our coalition partners our putting boots on the ground.
You have specifically criticzed our partners for not doing their part--not anymore with eight weeks to go huh MMC?


Get it now? Do you have it figured it out.....now? How many times are you going to falsely keep trying to say that others are saying to put US troops on the ground? Did you want to try another stab at it?

Yes, I will continue to stab at back-stabbers.
How do think the gang of four meeting with your President will turn out.
Don't you think the other 431 members--both parties--should shut up and quit posturing before the election?
Yet refuse to vote on a resolution ?
 
It has exactly the options it needs Monte. Do you think an Enemy like these Terrorists should be given a break. Yes or No. There isn't any other answers. Does one always give their enemy a chance to not lose?

Now yer directly and indirectly accusing the administration of giving an ENEMY like these TERRORISTS a break.
Try noticing what yer GOP mouthpieces are saying for that.

Do let me know how the DEAD enemy feel after 145 airstrikes.

And out the other side of your mouth, put out more cartoons that disgustingly play politics with beheadings.
Beheadings that are caused by the very actions you want .
 
If anybody needs to stay focuse it's you MMC.
How about another disgusting cartoon on beheading of journalists, make fun of your President?

Beheadings caused by the very bombing and "strategy" you demand .
Produce the link Nimby, where I said the US has to put troops on the ground. Don't try to deflect and go tangential. Stay Focused and produce that link
 
When the towers fell, the West as a whole was in shock, While we were in shock and even when we were in mourning the middle east was celibrating, they really loved seeing so many westeners die at the hands of "the warriors of Allah"

So now "the warriors of Allah" have turned on the middle east and to honor the dead we should race in all guns blazing to save them ?

The people we are supposed to help (kurds excluded) have tried to kill us the whole time we where there to protect and help them. It was Sunni militias killing us, shia militias killing us and every country in the middle east financing and training them.

To honor the people that died the past decade at the hands of these "warriors of Allah" we should do nothing, nothing at all. Just stand by the few friends we have there and let those warmongering west hating barbarians kill each other, they truly deserve the monster they created. It is not our fight, it is the fight of the enemies of the west among each other and they are trying to pull us in to do their dirty work.
 
It has exactly the options it needs Monte. Do you think an Enemy like these Terrorists should be given a break. Yes or No. There isn't any other answers. Does one always give their enemy a chance to not lose?

By your own admission, Obama's policies in the Middle East have given a 60% rise in terrorism. Yes, your poll needs at least one more option.
 
Your young and forgiven!

"You're"

Quite frankly I don't care.

If killing 20 million Iraqis meant saving 10 U.S citizens I'd do it.

Some have made the case that nuking them would only create more terrorism. Would it really? We nuked Japan in a war but did Japan or any other nation ultimately want to **** with the U.S.A? I guess Russia did, yet there were no conflicts, just an arms race that in the end ****ed the Russians over.

The Iraqis are worthless to me, they lost their worth when this **** started happening.
 
Lets ASSUME the administration has good intel on ISIS...on real viable effective targets. Then helllz yes 9/11 would be a GREAT day to rock their entire fricken world. Drones, bombs, snipers, laser beams from spy satellites, let the dust settle, then rinse, lather, and repeat.

That's hilarious!
 
"You're"

Quite frankly I don't care.

If killing 20 million Iraqis meant saving 10 U.S citizens I'd do it.

Some have made the case that nuking them would only create more terrorism. Would it really? We nuked Japan in a war but did Japan or any other nation ultimately want to **** with the U.S.A? I guess Russia did, yet there were no conflicts, just an arms race that in the end ****ed the Russians over.

The Iraqis are worthless to me, they lost their worth when this **** started happening.

Like I said, only because of YOUR youth are you forgiven for such contempt of rationale.
 
Like I said, only because of YOUR youth are you forgiven for such contempt of rationale.

Like I said, I don't care.

Nor do I care for these people anymore. They better watch themselves and their neighbors, if 911 happens again, I hope they get blown not to the stone age, but extinction.
 
Mornin RDS. :2wave: The US has not set the level of Threat at its Highest Alert.....I would disagree. We have sat back for 12 years always waiting to hear from these Terrorists. Why should we keep waiting. How about us taking to the Offense that day without a any doubt. So that going forward on 911.....the Terrorists knows.....Death is coming for them by way of the American People. Who they just cannot Intimidate. No matter how hard the fools try.

I think its high time we take the Fight to them.....Hit them in 4 or 5 Countries. Hit them at the break of day. All our People capable to do so. Intel and Military as well as anyone else that can take one out. Let them wake to a New Age.....which will be without them.
You took the fight to them in fact for 12 years and then began to relax. ISIS and insurgents filled the vacuum and now you going back in there with NATO to fight again.
 
Heya DH. :2wave: I agree with having a sound plan. Use to be.....we didn't need to explain anything out Right before we were going to do something. What do you think about BO coming out to give a Speech on 911?

This is what I don't understand. Why do we know everything that is going to happen before it happens?

The only thing I can figure is Obama tells us then looks at the polls to see if he should do it or not.

If we, as the public, know what is going to happen, then the bad guys know as well, thereby losing the element of surprise.

It doesn't make any sense to me.
 
The American people point blank don't want troops on the ground--what don't you get about that?

The crass politics trying to drive a wedge between the President and his liberal anti-war base is noted and I will continue to speak back to it .

The President should do what NEEDS to be done, not what the American people want.

Sometimes what needs to be done is hard.
 
Like I said, I don't care.

Nor do I care for these people anymore. They better watch themselves and their neighbors, if 911 happens again, I hope they get blown not to the stone age, but extinction.

A 9/11 style attack probably will happen again. But, just as with the first attackers, they won't be blown to extinction. And as long as the US continues to support militant Islamic groups as we have at least since Jimmy Carter, and destabilizing the Middle East as we have done by removing guys like Hussein, Mubarak, Gaddafi and Assad, which create power vacuums for these groups to exploit and become strengthened, we'll have more no doubt.
 
The President should do what NEEDS to be done, not what the American people want.

Sometimes what needs to be done is hard.

Yes, the president should be more overtly a dictator. Tell the other two branches of government, and his constituents to go to hell, he alone knows best. Hopefully, he doesn't read your post and get any ideas. ;)
 
You took the fight to them in fact for 12 years and then began to relax. ISIS and insurgents filled the vacuum and now you going back in there with NATO to fight again.

Yep, that's about it.
 
Yes, the president should be more overtly a dictator. Tell the other two branches of government, and his constituents to go to hell, he alone knows best. Hopefully, he doesn't read your post and get any ideas. ;)

That was not my point and you know it.
 
Then explain what are the hard choices that the president is "avoiding"

NIMBY said there should be no boots on the ground because the American people don't want them there.

I said sometimes the President has to do things even if the American people don't want it.

That is what being a President is all about.
 
Back
Top Bottom