• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do you think the press is failing to objectively cover the situation in Ferguson, Mis

Do you think the press is failing to objectively cover the situation in Ferguson, Mis


  • Total voters
    33
Re: Do you think the press is failing to objectively cover the situation in Ferguson,

Excuse me, but this was all live coverage...

And ? There are many ways to express bias.
 
Re: Do you think the press is failing to objectively cover the situation in Ferguson,

`
The corporate controlled media is milking this incident, of course for their own profit. Objective reporting is one thing but Op-Ed's containing pure conjecture and hypothesis, in measured portions as to keep whatever readership/viewership they have, less fixated on the facts, but more obsessed with the presumptions surrounding it.
 
Re: Do you think the press is failing to objectively cover the situation in Ferguson,

The problem is not just in Ferguson but with the entire media apparatus in general. I think Seymour Hersh mentioned it in a article he wrote some time ago lamenting that most journalists these days are just after the money- they have put their integrity aside for the sake of sensationalism and their own personal agendas.
 
Re: Do you think the press is failing to objectively cover the situation in Ferguson,

The press almost invariably fails to objectively cover things. And the chance of them doing so drops the bigger the story.

So, yes.
 
Back
Top Bottom