solletica
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2011
- Messages
- 6,073
- Reaction score
- 926
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
But he's just a "teenager", Nota -- a poor, defenseless teenager!
Um, who is saying that? ? Please cite.
But he's just a "teenager", Nota -- a poor, defenseless teenager!
But he's just a "teenager", Nota -- a poor, defenseless teenager!
I'm always amazed when racialists have no ability to understand the world around them without framing all human interaction based upon race with one race automatically the victim despite their actual pattern of behavior.
For every genuine racist who hates blacks for being black, there must be a hundred racialists who act as enablers for bad behavior.
Ah -- even more bizarre fantasies.
In another thread, you've insinuated that the vid-cam footage was faked. I wonder if you still think this, given that it's been confirmed who the guy strong-arming the tiny-by-comparison clerk was.
Careful, those are some big, adult words you are using: confirmed, insinuated. I recommend that you not use such words until you actually know what they mean.
By Occam's Razor (another word to which you're not likely familiar), that's the explanation for him not being charged, given all the OTHER known facts.
Good kid, college bound, straight A student, never gotten into trouble before - Between this place and others, I've heard all this.
Well, I once fanatasized that right wingers could actually comprehened logic for 5 min. and turn off foxnews, limbaugh, hannity, etc., but then I woke up.
However, that day, he felt like robbing a convenience store to throw away his life. Makes sense to me
Well, I once fanatasized that right wingers could actually comprehened logic for 5 min. and turn off foxnews, limbaugh, hannity, etc., but then I woke up.
This may honestly go under conspiracy theories but Michael Brown was shot six minutes after the robbery,
Well, if you really understood the concept of Occam's razor, the simplest explanation would be that he does this sort of thing all the time in life,
BZZZT. He had no criminal record, so that's out the door.
Michael Brown had no criminal record - St. Louis Business Journal
Try again.
However, that day, he felt like robbing a convenience store to throw away his life. Makes sense to me
Have you actually seen the video? Are you discounting it completely?
Here's the version of the events that's consistent w/all the facts and Occam's Razor. . .
darrell wilson shoots dead Michael Brown who is fleeing from him. And unfortunately for him, there are witnesses and word gets out.
Cops in police dept. are in a frenzy--have to come w/up a story fast to justify the cops' actions, and decide to make a phony video of a robbery, paying the convenience store clerk/manager a large sum of $$ to film it there. Cops make the video, then decide to say that the wilson was trying to capture a robber--Michael Wilson--fleeing the crime.
However, the evidence doesn't hold up that wilson could've known about the robbery at the time, and so cops are left to say that wilson didn't know about the robbery but that it happened anyway. Cops then go to Brown's friend, Johnson, and coerce him into saying that he helped rob the store in exchange for not charging him w/another crime and letting him walk free.
It's the simplest logical explanation given the following facts
1) Cops waited for 2 days before releasing robbery account, instead of immediately following the incident.
2) Michael Brown had no criminal record
3) Dorian Johnson wasn't charged w/robbery, even though video (supposedly) shows he helped commit it.
I suggest you go back to listening to Limbaugh, since logic is too much for your conservative head.
The video could've been made after the shooting using actors. Cops can easily arrange such things.
.
The video could've been made after the shooting using actors. Cops can easily arrange such things.
If the story were consistent, then that possibility could've been dismissed, but because the account in the video makes the whole story inconsistent, the possibility of fraud must be raised.
The video could've been made after the shooting using actors. Cops can easily arrange such things.
If the story were consistent, then that possibility could've been dismissed, but because the account in the video makes the whole story inconsistent, the possibility of fraud must be raised.
Well they went to amazing detail to do so, since even his underwear matched in both events, robbery and shooting.
See pics in post 139 in this thread:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...-suspect-before-he-shot-death-police-say.html