If that remark is referenced to "Quote Originally Posted by beefheart View Post
"Evidently you haven't lost the right to post hyperbolic blather. "Quote"
Then your ignorance is out of the closet. Put it back.
If instead you are agreeing the government is illegal and by ignoring the 10th amendment has embarked on tyranny as feared by founders, then you are astute.
Bill of Rights
"During the debates on the adoption of the Constitution, its opponents repeatedly charged that the Constitution as drafted would open the way to tyranny by the central government. Fresh in their minds was the memory of the British violation of civil rights before and during the Revolution. They demanded a "bill of rights" that would spell out the immunities of individual citizens. Several state conventions in their formal ratification of the Constitution asked for such amendments; others ratified the Constitution with the understanding that the amendments would be offered.
On September 25, 1789, the First Congress of the United States therefore proposed to the state legislatures
12 amendments to the Constitution that met arguments most frequently advanced against it. The
first two proposed amendments, which concerned the number of constituents for each Representative and the compensation of Congressmen, were
not ratified.
Articles 3 to 12, however, ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures, constitute the first 10 amendments of the Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights."
Bill of Rights Transcript Text
Article the eleventh(ratified as 9th)...
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people
Article the twelfth (ratified as 10th)...
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.