• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Does liberalism contribute to the issues this woman demonstrates? [W:232]

Does liberalism contribute to the issues this woman demonstrates?

  • Im a right leaning American, yes.

    Votes: 7 36.8%
  • Im a left leaning American, yes.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Im not American, yes.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Im a right leaning American, no.

    Votes: 1 5.3%
  • Im a left leaning American, no.

    Votes: 10 52.6%
  • Im not American, no.

    Votes: 1 5.3%

  • Total voters
    19
No, good old Cliven was obviously a leftie, expecting his government freebies and all.

Yep. And he took his 'reparations' because his family settled this land in the 1800s.

Although the woman in the video was probably a tad tougher on immigration than Bundy, so she might be a little left of him.
 
No, good old Cliven was obviously a leftie, expecting his government freebies and all.

welfare-keeping-democrats-power-vik-battaile-republican-obam-politics-1345552005.jpg
 
Sure thing 50/50.
The only sure thing is that Cliven Bundy is demanding freebies, reparations, and blaming others. I call that being entitled.

You probably consider it being a great American.
 
The only sure thing is that Cliven Bundy is demanding freebies, reparations, and blaming others. I call that being entitled.

You probably consider it being a great American.

It does fit in with being a "liberal".

Maybe Cliven and the woman in the video would hit it off and become friends. They seem to be one of a kind, after all, and she could perhaps teach him something about "the Negro."
 
It does fit in with being a "liberal".

Maybe Cliven and the woman in the video would hit it off and become friends. They seem to be one of a kind, after all, and she could perhaps teach him something about "the Negro."
She can invite him to sit on her porch in the public-housing project with the half a dozen older people and kids in front of that government house where the door is usually open, people who have nothing to do because they are basically on government subsidy, aborting their young children and putting their young men in jail...pick cotton. They can always talk about picking cotton, wondering "are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”
 
I came across this tragic video clip-and after the shock subsided I felt pity for this woman. She not only demonstrated racist comments, but also delusions about society, entitlement, victimization, and profound ignorance of what should be basic awareness of history-likely she was educated by a public school, perhaps not graduating from high school. She is clearly frustrated but blames others for her problems, in a very vulgar manner. This is NOT funny, but I want to guage in this poll how our forumites feel.

When looking at liberal institutions like the war on poverty, poor public schools without recourse, victimization, affirmative action, identity politics, reparations, anti-capitalism, critical theory, and social marxism-Does liberalism contribute to the issues this woman demonstrates?

Please note this exchange is FILLED with vulgar language and as such is NSFW.



Not sure if liberalism contributes to this, but the video definitely validates to conservatives talk radio caricatures of others.
 
Not sure if liberalism contributes to this, but the video definitely validates to conservatives talk radio caricatures of others.

Actually, watch the democrat national convention. Lots of those concepts demonstrated here. Liberalism thrives on victimhood and the number of people dependant on govt and the "compassionate" party.
 
Actually, watch the democrat national convention. Lots of those concepts demonstrated here. Liberalism thrives on victimhood and the number of people dependant on govt and the "compassionate" party.

Since when is compassion a bad thing?

Honestly if I wanted the line of garbage you're throwing out I'd listen to Rush...at least he's entertaining.
 
Actually, watch the democrat national convention. Lots of those concepts demonstrated here. Liberalism thrives on victimhood and the number of people dependant on govt and the "compassionate" party.

Actually, watch the republican national convention. Lots of those concepts demonstrated here. Wingnuttery thrives on victimhood and the number of people dependant on govt and the "Christianist" party.
 
I guess it did (liberalism, that is).

But her main problem is that she's the stereotypical black mother of the Chicago/St.Louis street thugs. Whitey caused all her problems. Grandma-ma just died as a "104 year old former slave". And "her people" built this country.
 
Since when is compassion a bad thing?

Honestly if I wanted the line of garbage you're throwing out I'd listen to Rush...at least he's entertaining.

Its not compassion, its feigned compassion-"I care about you...vote for me for handouts". And then its time for the next victim.
 
Its not compassion, its feigned compassion-"I care about you...vote for me for handouts". And then its time for the next victim.

Well you seem to have a strong understanding of the Liberal psyche. Of course, Liberals would be better off giving more goodies to corporations and wealthier people. Unfortunately the voting rate among the poor is the lowest in the country. Now...if you...say....privatize prisons so that a corporation makes tons of money...better yet you also pass a host of very punitive laws, you have a sector that will bank roll your elections for decades.

Maybe Conservatives ARE the smart ones, they give handouts to the correct people while Liberals tend to give handouts to folks that don't vote or have money to donate.
 
Well you seem to have a strong understanding of the Liberal psyche. Of course, Liberals would be better off giving more goodies to corporations and wealthier people. Unfortunately the voting rate among the poor is the lowest in the country. Now...if you...say....privatize prisons so that a corporation makes tons of money...better yet you also pass a host of very punitive laws, you have a sector that will bank roll your elections for decades.

Maybe Conservatives ARE the smart ones, they give handouts to the correct people while Liberals tend to give handouts to folks that don't vote or have money to donate.

Liberals vote enough-and the rest are kept dumb and compliant. The same group of thinkers that forces people to buy private insurance also with a straight face says getting photo ID is an insurmountable task. :roll:

As far as the liberal psyche-its about feeling good. Symbolism over substance. You can see this in the response lefties employ when talking with people harmed by the ACA, or the responses of "tolerant" liberals to women or blacks who have the nerve to vote republican-they are treated quite nasty.

This is about political power for the left-and ignorant, dependant "voters" like this woman and all of those magical illegals dems like to import like its cool are part of the problem.
 
Liberals vote enough-and the rest are kept dumb and compliant. The same group of thinkers that forces people to buy private insurance also with a straight face says getting photo ID is an insurmountable task. :roll:.

The poor...those that you say depend on handouts don't vote.

A Closer Look at the Parties in 2012 | Pew Research Center for the People and the Press
43% of voters that make less than 30k a year vote Republican
45% of voters that make less than 30k a year vote Democratic
Not really this huge handout population you seem to pretend. That's using 30k a year as well...that's above the amount needed for assistance.

As far as the liberal psyche-its about feeling good. Symbolism over substance. You can see this in the response lefties employ when talking with people harmed by the ACA, or the responses of "tolerant" liberals to women or blacks who have the nerve to vote republican-they are treated quite nasty.
I have no idea who most people vote for unless they have a bumper sticker. I'm guessing you're talking about very specific circumstances which isn't exactly a good indication of how liberal blacks or women act to those that vote Republican and are black or women.

This is about political power for the left-and ignorant, dependant "voters" like this woman and all of those magical illegals dems like to import like its cool are part of the problem.
There's no way, no metric, nothing you can show that this country is ran by the poor or newly immigrated poor. Maybe in the 1800's there were some cities with large immigrant populations that through machine politics where were dominated by poor immigrants..but it's always been moneyed interest that have held political power. It's the Jaime Diamon's not the Jose's that can meet with a president or congressman from any party at any time.
 
The poor...those that you say depend on handouts don't vote.

A Closer Look at the Parties in 2012 | Pew Research Center for the People and the Press
43% of voters that make less than 30k a year vote Republican
45% of voters that make less than 30k a year vote Democratic
Not really this huge handout population you seem to pretend. That's using 30k a year as well...that's above the amount needed for assistance.


I have no idea who most people vote for unless they have a bumper sticker. I'm guessing you're talking about very specific circumstances which isn't exactly a good indication of how liberal blacks or women act to those that vote Republican and are black or women.


There's no way, no metric, nothing you can show that this country is ran by the poor or newly immigrated poor. Maybe in the 1800's there were some cities with large immigrant populations that through machine politics where were dominated by poor immigrants..but it's always been moneyed interest that have held political power. It's the Jaime Diamon's not the Jose's that can meet with a president or congressman from any party at any time.

Like I said, the poor vote enough. Enough to not bite the hand that feeds them.
 
Back
Top Bottom