• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should law enforcement and corrections be outsourced to private companies?

Should law enforcement and corrections be outsourced to private companies?

  • Yes only for Law enforcement

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes only for corrections

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I do not know

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    16

jamesrage

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
36,705
Reaction score
17,867
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
Should law enforcement and corrections be outsourced to private companies?

Yes for both
Yes only for Law enforcement
Yes only for corrections
no
I do not know.


Maybe I seen too many Robocop movies but I feel that law enforcement is something that should only be carried out by the government. I am feel that since the motivation of any business is profit that corrections are something that should not be motivated profit.If someone gets sent to prison it should be due to the fact that individual deserves it, not because some judge might be getting some money.
 
Last edited:
Justice should never be put in the hands of private organizations.
 
Should law enforcement and corrections be outsourced to private companies?

Yes for both
Yes only for Law enforcement
Yes only for corrections
no
I do not know.

I voted yes but feel that I must explain the limits of this "outsourcing". Just as national defense uses expert/specialized contractors so too can the civilian sectors of gov't There is no need to hire mercenaries but it makes sense to use commercial (or contract) carriers to transport troops and supplies when that can save time/money.

Many cities use contract personnel for support functions like impounded vehicle storage, laundry and janitorial services. What mission difference does it make if police choose to save money by using a private firing range or a prison elects to have the grass cut by a contractor?

I do not foresee having the powers of arrest or setting prison policy turned over completely to contract personnel, but use of support service contract personnel and even requesting outside audits and reviews of procedures is not "outsourcing" the entire operation.
 
I voted yes but feel that I must explain the limits of this "outsourcing". Just as national defense uses expert/specialized contractors so too can the civilian sectors of gov't There is no need to hire mercenaries but it makes sense to use commercial (or contract) carriers to transport troops and supplies when that can save time/money.

Many cities use contract personnel for support functions like impounded vehicle storage, laundry and janitorial services. What mission difference does it make if police choose to save money by using a private firing range or a prison elects to have the grass cut by a contractor?

I do not foresee having the powers of arrest or setting prison policy turned over completely to contract personnel, but use of support service contract personnel and even requesting outside audits and reviews of procedures is not "outsourcing" the entire operation.

Bold: I'd have no problem making those in prison mow the lawns and do janitorial work. In fact I wouldn't even mind if they brought back chain gangs. Put tracking collars around their necks made of 1 inch steel and they won't get very far if they try and run away.
 
Should law enforcement and corrections be outsourced to private companies?

absolutely not.
 
Only if the company has to meet the same standards the state has to meet and that out sourcing remains in the state of conviction.
 
Not a chance. In fact, private prisons ought to be abolished.
 
I voted yes but feel that I must explain the limits of this "outsourcing". Just as national defense uses expert/specialized contractors so too can the civilian sectors of gov't There is no need to hire mercenaries but it makes sense to use commercial (or contract) carriers to transport troops and supplies when that can save time/money.

Many cities use contract personnel for support functions like impounded vehicle storage, laundry and janitorial services. What mission difference does it make if police choose to save money by using a private firing range or a prison elects to have the grass cut by a contractor?

I do not foresee having the powers of arrest or setting prison policy turned over completely to contract personnel, but use of support service contract personnel and even requesting outside audits and reviews of procedures is not "outsourcing" the entire operation.

I answered "No" before I understood that under "law enforcement" you were including managing prisons. I have no problem with out-sourcing prison management. In fact, taking away the political aspect from these jobs and the day-to-day management, might be infinitely preferable to patronage jobs and budgetary sleight-of-hand.
 
Should law enforcement and corrections be outsourced to private companies?

Yes for both
Yes only for Law enforcement
Yes only for corrections
no
I do not know.


Maybe I seen too many Robocop movies but I feel that law enforcement is something that should only be carried out by the government. I am feel that since the motivation of any business is profit that corrections are something that should not be motivated profit.If someone gets sent to prison it should be due to the fact that individual deserves it, not because some judge might be getting some money.
My ideal option was not included: No no, not 'hell no', but 'no effing way, never... ever'. But I voted 'no' as that was close enough.

The sole motivation for arresting someone and putting them in jail/prison should be did they do something to warrant such actions. Not 'can some guy make a buck off it'.
 
You gotta break the police unions some how - hell YES
 
Should law enforcement and corrections be outsourced to private companies?

Yes for both
Yes only for Law enforcement
Yes only for corrections
no
I do not know.


Maybe I seen too many Robocop movies but I feel that law enforcement is something that should only be carried out by the government. I am feel that since the motivation of any business is profit that corrections are something that should not be motivated profit.If someone gets sent to prison it should be due to the fact that individual deserves it, not because some judge might be getting some money.

With more prisoners per capita than anyone else, the last thing we need is a powerful entity with a financial incentive to keep as many people as possible locked up. Such a plan would not only have people in jail unnecessarily, but would cost a mint.
 
Back
Top Bottom