Jackson1050
New member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 3
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
overall, as of right now, id rather have the 30000, because Obama would probably use it on something else like ObamaCare
A) $250,000 income with 0 compulsory tax burden, but instead a voluntary actions tax like the founders created.
B) $250,000 income with $125,000 government compulsory income tax burden.
this would have been the better poll question.
i vote A
overall, as of right now, id rather have the 30000, because Obama would probably use it on something else like ObamaCare
This is a public poll. I will be able to see your vote later. I already know which one that you prefer but I'll still keep checking to see which way you vote in this poll.
I'll be looking for your vote later on. This is a public poll.
A) A $30,000 income with a $0.00 tax burden?
or
B) A $250,000 income with a $125,000 tax burden?
Why do you think your answer is the most advantageous for you?
your feeble attempts to justify people who work harder than you paying more taxes fails on me
You are free to take that into consideration as well. I would guess the guy making $30,000 has a much easier job than the guy making $250,000. Wouldn't you think so? People are still choosing option B. It kind of makes you wonder if money incentivizes people to work harder. If you use this poll as a guide, it seems that money does incentivize people to work harder.
A person satisfied with 30,000 is a person with no ambition. And usually those with no ambition are more than willing to make the other guy pick up the tab for the things he benefits from.
I didn't vote in your poll because neither scenario is acceptable to me.
the poll is not a fair poll, a blind man can see from 10 blocks, under A you going to have 30,000 and B your going to have 125,000....anyone would working in the own self interest would want the latter.
Really depends. Am I stuck at the chosen income and rate?
A person satisfied with 30,000 is a person with no ambition. And usually those with no ambition are more than willing to make the other guy pick up the tab for the things he benefits from.
You can't make that conclusion. Your "poll" was worded in a way that the situation was in a vacuum, with no difference in difficulty or amount of work.
Grand Mal voted Option A. Are you accusing him of having no ambition?
Grand Mal voted Option A. Are you accusing him of having no ambition?
What I find troubling are the number that voted to settle for half their pay to pay half in taxes.
I'd vote option B. I'd rather have more money. Although it's still unjust and unfair for the government to take 50% of that.
I'd vote option B. I'd rather have more money.
NeitherWhich one do you prefer?