• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Have you heard of Nathan Trapuzzano?

He made a point. It is over your head. You don't have to knowingly repeat history, to repeat history. There is NO similarities between this case and Zimmerman, except a murderer and a dead guy. In this case the murderer went to jail as soon as the police caught him. In Zimmermans case the police gave him a ride home. If you cannot see the difference you simply don't want to.
tres borrachos said:
Stop with snippeting out my posts and ignoring the parts that show your narrative to be BS.

Now back to your proof that I said there is a race war or a Jew cover up in the media, here or anywhere else. Where is it?
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
mak2 said:
He made a point. I is over your head. You don't have to knowingly repeat history, to repeat history. There is NO similarities between this case and Zimmerman, except a murderer and a dead guy. In this case the murderer went to jail as soon as the police caught him. In Zimmermans case the police gave him a ride home. If you cannot see the difference you simply don't want to.
Click to expand...

You're right, there is no similarity except 2 dead guys.

In the Martin case, it got national attention right on up to the POTUS. I missed his expressions of grief for this man's family. When did he make them?

So if the police had arrested Martin, Obama would have spared us his "black men are followed in department stores" nonsense - which, by the way, had nothing to do with the Martin case, unless Obama believes that Hispanic men follow black men in department stores for no particular reason?
 
Does anyone know that this thread is about?
 
ecofarm said:
I'm ignoring your pontification and staying on point, if you don't mind.

I've already explained that you obviously are not aware of the routine, and so that was not explicit in your statement. Nonetheless, the routine, after claiming media bias, goes on to examine Rothchild and other "Jewish" media.

Obviously, you have nothing against Jews and you had no intention of claiming that the "Jewish media" is doing this. You were just claiming that the media -in general- does this, not knowing of an important detail regarding the CT you've engaged in.
Click to expand...

So where is the proof that I believe there is a race war or a Jew media conspiracy? Nowhere - exactly as I said.

I'm not the forum owner, nor am I here to concern myself with what other posters post. And the neo-Nazis aren't the subject of this thread. So your "point" isn't relative to my posts in this thread. If you want to discuss neo-Nazis, I'm sure someone will indulge you. That person isn't me. So spare me your pontifications. Unlike you, I'm talking about the subject of the OP's thread.
 
mak2 said:
Does anyone know that this thread is about?
Click to expand...

It would appear to be Nathan Trapuzzano and the media handling of his murder based on the first few posts by the person who started this thread. Not neo-Nazis.
 
scapegoating. Ever heard of it?
tres borrachos said:
So where is the proof that I believe there is a race war or a Jew media conspiracy? Nowhere - exactly as I said.

I'm not the forum owner, nor am I here to concern myself with what other posters post. And the neo-Nazis aren't the subject of this thread. So your "point" isn't relative to my posts in this thread. If you want to discuss neo-Nazis, I'm sure someone will indulge you. That person isn't me. So spare me your pontifications. Unlike you, I'm talking about the subject of the OP's thread.
Click to expand...
 
tres borrachos said:
So where is the proof that I believe there is a race war or a Jew media conspiracy? Nowhere - exactly as I said.
Click to expand...

How many times must I post that I do not believe you claimed such explicitly?

You merely missed a part of the CT, because you are not engaging in it knowingly. It's like claiming controlled demolition (media bias) but not mentioning the thermite (Rothchild).
 
A psycho shot an innocent man. Unfortunately it is not rare enough to make national news. If that is really what this thread is about we should be talking about how many murders there are nationwide instead of whatever it is we are talking about. So it seems to me this thread is about something else. Of course, if you want to make the case Z is a psycho I could see that...
tres borrachos said:
It would appear to be Nathan Trapuzzano and the media handling of his murder based on the first few posts by the person who started this thread. Not neo-Nazis.
Click to expand...
 
ecofarm said:
How many times must I post that I do not believe you claimed such explicitly?

You merely missed a part of the CT, because you are not engaging in it knowingly. It's like claiming controlled demolition (media bias) but not mentioning the thermite (Rothchild).
Click to expand...

I'm not engaging in it at all. I don't think the media is biased. I think they're ignorant.

Stop projecting your distaste for neo-Nazis on me. I'm not one. End of story.
 
tres borrachos said:
I'm not engaging in it at all. I don't think the media is biased. I think they're ignorant.
Click to expand...

So you don't think there's a CT? You believe ignorance has lead to fantastic levels of media bias sensationalizing crimes by whites and ignoring crimes by blacks?

What is the media, and everyone else, ignorant about which is causing this extreme bias?
 
ecofarm said:
So you don't think there's a CT? You believe ignorance has lead to fantastic levels of media bias sensationalizing crimes by whites and ignoring crimes by blacks?

What is the media, and everyone else, ignorant about which is causing this extreme bias?
Click to expand...

If you had read the parts of my posts that you snippeted out, you would see that I am critical of the media for the overplaying of (for instance) the JonBenet Ramsey and Laci Peterson cases, both white victims of crimes, which is why I believe the media is ignorant, and which has nothing to do with believing they are biased against anyone.

It isn't a conspiracy - it's ignorance.
 
tres borrachos said:
If you had read the parts of my posts that you snippeted out, you would see that I am critical of the media for the overplaying of (for instance) the JonBenet Ramsey and Laci Peterson cases, both white victims of crimes, which is why I believe the media is ignorant, and which has nothing to do with believing they are biased against anyone.

It isn't a conspiracy - it's ignorance.
Click to expand...

Weren't those same-race crimes?

Ignorance of what?
 
tres borrachos said:
You know that was a white on white crime? Who is the white person who killed her then?
Click to expand...

That's the unknown. The other is white on white, isn't it? And who cares, anyway? How are you dealing with the claim of media bias?

Did you ever tell us what the media, and everyone, is ignorant of, which is causing this media distortion?
 
ecofarm said:
That's the unknown. The other is white on white, isn't it? And who cares, anyway? How are you dealing with the claim of media bias?

Did you ever tell us what the media, and everyone, is ignorant of, which is causing this media distortion?
Click to expand...

Did you ever find my posts that support your claim that I post as a neo-Nazi? No, you didn't.

I said the media was ignorant. Do you know what that word means? It means they are willfully unaware. They thrive on sensationalism and lack the common sense to report on 1, what is important, and 2, what is relevant. Trayvon Martin was neither - nor was Laci Peterson, nor was JonBenet, nor was OJ, and so on.

I am talking about the national media and these are my opinions and I never said "everyone" was ignorant of anything, so once again you are placing words in my mouth that I never said.

I'll let you have the last word to yourself because I wasted too much time on you and will be putting you on ignore so I don't have to read your nonsense. Your gripe is with the neo-Nazis and I don't really give a damn who you have issues with. Leave me out of your attacks on them, be a big boy, and fight your battles with them, not me.

Have a lovely day.
 
mak2 said:
Does anyone know that this thread is about?
Click to expand...

I'm not even sure anymore. Everybody but the OP is acknowledging that Z/M is completely different. Which means we're down "the liberal media hates white people." But nobody wants to say that, or admit they're playing the victim. So I'm not sure.
 
tres borrachos said:
Have a lovely day.
Click to expand...

I don't understand. Did you explain what ignorance (ignorance of what?) causes black on white crimes to be ignored and white on black crimes to be sensationalized?

Enlighten us, so that we may also see and understand this tremendous media distortion.
 
Ockham said:
It is completely different except where it applies to race. Why is it okay to bring race into it with Martin and not here?
Click to expand...

Why was it wrong with Martin, but OK here? I'm trying to play by Conservative rules.
 
mac said:
They're not entirely different situations, they are somewhat different....as any two situations usually are. The only real reason that it hasn't made national news is that it was a white guy killed by a black guy. Had the only difference in this situation been the skin color of those involved...it would have been national news, and you wouldn't have had to google him. The race hustlers would have made sure you heard about it.
Click to expand...

The Zimmerman case was not national news. And there never was a Martin case. The issue had been investigated locally, determined there was no case, and put to bed. The national news started when the race baiters decided that it would make good copy, and stirred the pot.

Two years and millions of dollars later a jury decided that the original decision was correct.
 
jimbo said:
The Zimmerman case was not national news. And there never was a Martin case. The issue had been investigated locally, determined there was no case, and put to bed. The national news started when the race baiters decided that it would make good copy, and stirred the pot.

Two years and millions of dollars later a jury decided that the original decision was correct.
Click to expand...

So if that shouldn't have been news, why should this?
 
rocket88 said:
So if that shouldn't have been news, why should this?
Click to expand...

It shouldn't, that's my point.

Prior to this thread, I had never heard of this case, nor, for that matter, the Zimmerman case until a self defense issue became a racial issue.
 
ecofarm said:
Haha, that's funny. The prosecution did fail to exist.
Click to expand...

Check the records. I don't think you will find a Martin case related to Zimmerman.

Typically, dead people are not prosecuted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom