• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are interracial couples acceptable?[ W: 330]

How do you feel about interracial couples

  • It's wrong to date and have children with other races

    Votes: 2 1.8%
  • It depends on the race

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Interracial couples and children are completely acceptable to me

    Votes: 106 93.8%
  • I have mixed feelings

    Votes: 5 4.4%

  • Total voters
    113
Why do you include an opinion of a newspaper and omit the following from the source you quote:

. Powell received almost 120,000 (predominantly positive) letters and a Gallup poll at the end of April showed that 74 per cent of those asked agreed with his speech and only 15 per cent disagreed, 11 per cent unsure. . . .

After the 'Rivers of Blood' speech Powell was transformed into a national public figure and won huge support across Britain.[3][4] Three days after the speech, on 23 April, as the Race Relations Bill was being debated in the House of Commons, 1,000 dockers marched on Westminster protesting against the "victimisation" of Powell and the next day 400 meat porters from Smithfield market handed in a 92-page petition in support of Powell, amidst other mass demonstrations of working class support, much of it from trade unionists, in London and Wolverhampton.[10]:354

The future Labour leader Michael Foot remarked to a reporter that it was "tragic" that this "outstanding personality" had been widely misunderstood as predicting actual bloodshed in Britain, when in fact he had used the Aeneid quotation merely to communicate his own sense of foreboding.[1]

Thirty years after the speech, Edward Heath admitted that Powell's remarks on the "economic burden of immigration" had been "not without prescience."[1]

In an interview for Today shortly after her departure from office in 1991, Margaret Thatcher said that Powell had "made a valid argument, if in sometimes regrettable terms​

And then of course we have the ability to test his analysis against reality. Was he correct or incorrect?

Something quite remarkable happened in London in the first decade of the new millennium. The number of white British people in the capital fell by 620,000 - equivalent to the entire population of Glasgow moving out.

The consequence, as revealed by the latest census, is that white Brits are now in a minority in London, making up just 45% of its residents.

And does "the black man have the whip hand over the white man"?????

Isnt that Powells grand prediction?! Where is it!!! Where did it come true!!!!

Your just a racist.
 
I didn't make the world the way it is, I'm just tossing out an observation I made with as much honesty and realism as I can. If you don't want to believe it, that's on you.

I don't care much what your opinion on this is...I am just telling you that to say you know what most men think about something is a ludicrously inaccurate statement.

But, if you think making such statements helps your credibility...knock yourself out.
 
1.) worked up? how do you come to that conclusion by me laughing and saying how hilarious that is? lol

seems like just as solid as an assumption as MOST guys feel just like you lol

2.) never suggested you care what people think of you, another failed strawman, i only pointed out your false statement

3.) again, another failed strawman, no hang up at all. Pointed out the parts that were wrong and the parts that made no sense

anything else lol?

1. You used emotional language. But maybe you're just an emotional guy all the time. I don't know you. My impression is that you're all worked up.

2. You called me mentally retarded, so you actually insulted me. So, to that, and to anyone else who thinks my thoughts/feelings on interracial couples is "retarded," it doesn't bother me one bit. You're a post on a computer screen. I can get rid of you with one click. Doesn't affect me.

3. I didn't say you had a hangup, I said IF you have a problem with the way I think, that's your hangup and not something I'm concerned about.
 
I don't care much what your opinion on this is...I am just telling you that to say you know what most men think about something is a ludicrously inaccurate statement.

But, if you think making such statements helps your credibility...knock yourself out.

I think most people would get the gist of what I was saying, but whatever. Way to go, dude.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Gentlemen... calm and civility please. Address the topic, no ad-hominem attacks.
 

It costs $36 dollars to look at it...like I am going to pay that.

So...your sources are a race obsessed online dating site and a report that costs most people $36 dollars to look at?

Oh yeah...impeccable credentials...NOT.

:rolleyes:


Btw, interesting that you are so interested in these race-based threads (I have seen you post in other ones).

Do you think that one 'race' is superior to another?
 
But you mind mixed race couples?

Don't even answer, it's too confusing to follow.

No. I NEVER said that. Go back and find ONCE where I said it was unacceptable, shouldn't be allowed to happen, or demonized.

Your post is irresponsible - at best.
 
A bit of context:

avatar7196_3.gif

"John Enoch Powell, MBE (/ˈdʒɒn ˈiːnɒk paʊl/; 16 June 1912 – 8 February 1998) was a British politician, classical scholar, linguist and poet. He served as a Conservative Member of Parliament (MP) (1950–74), Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) MP (1974–1987), and Minister of Health (1960–63). He attained most prominence in 1968, when he made a controversial speech on immigration, now widely referred to as the "Rivers of Blood" speech. In response, he was dismissed from his position as Shadow Defence Secretary (1965–68) in the Shadow Cabinet of Edward Heath..

on 20 April 1968, he made a controversial speech in Birmingham in which he warned his audience of what he believed would be the consequences of continued unchecked immigration from the Commonwealth to Britain. Above all, it is an allusion to the Roman poet Virgil towards the end of the speech which has been remembered, giving the speech its colloquial name:

As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding. Like the Roman, I seem to see 'the River Tiber foaming with much blood'. That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the States itself, is coming upon us here by our own volition and our own neglect. Indeed, it has all but come. In numerical terms, it will be of American proportions long before the end of the 20th century. Only resolute and urgent action will avert it even now.

The Times declared it "an evil speech", stating, "This is the first time that a serious British politician has appealed to racial hatred in this direct way in our postwar history."[23]

The main political issue addressed by the speech was not immigration as such, however. It was the introduction by the Labour Government of the Race Relations Act 1968, which Powell found offensive and immoral. The Act would prohibit discrimination on the grounds of race in certain areas of British life, particularly housing, where many local authorities had been refusing to provide houses for immigrant families until they had lived in the country for a certain number of years.[24][25]

One feature of his speech was the extensive quotation of a letter he claimed to have received detailing the experiences of one of his constituents in Wolverhampton. The writer described the fate of an elderly woman who was supposedly the last white person living in her street. She had repeatedly refused applications from nonwhites requiring rooms-to-let, which resulted in her being called a "racialist" outside her home and receiving "excreta" through her letterbox.[26][27]"
Wikipedia

Conservative-MP-Enoch-Pow-011.jpg

Yeah, I think most perceptive people have already figured out there's a clear agenda at work here. ;)
 
1. You used emotional language. But maybe you're just an emotional guy all the time. I don't know you. My impression is that you're all worked up.

2. You called me mentally retarded, so you actually insulted me.

3.)So, to that, and to anyone else who thinks my thoughts/feelings on interracial couples is "retarded," it doesn't bother me one bit. You're a post on a computer screen. I can get rid of you with one click. Doesn't affect me.

4.). I didn't say you had a hangup, I said IF you have a problem with the way I think, that's your hangup and not something I'm concerned about.

1.) nope thats your false perception
the emotion i have is complete humor over she must have herpes lol

2.) now you are just lying i NEVER called you mentally retarded. Once again you are showing a sever lack of perception.

3.) again never implied that you care about people pointing out your false statments and the illogical nature of the logic you provided. FOr some reason you keep repeating it though, weird. Make sure you tell us in your next post too lol

5.) and again its a strawman because i have no hang up nor do i care your feelings on it lol

please try to keep up and discuss things that were actually and factually said
 
It costs $36 dollars to look at it...like I am going to pay that.

Is it my problem that you don't have academic access to the source? Go to a library if you want to run it down, they can get it for you for free.

So...your sources are a race obsessed online dating site and a report that costs most people $36 dollars to look at?

A race obsessed dating site? What are you babbling about? OK Cupid is a huge, mainstream dating site and they do all sorts of dating analysis from their massive database. They can probably tell you your likelihood of having sex on the first date. There's nothing about them that says that they're race obsessed, that's only you attempting to smear them.

You asked for links and you don't offer a one, not a single criticism of their findings, all you come up with it to call them names. Pathetic.

Btw, interesting that you are so interested in these race-based threads (I have seen you post in other ones).

Yeah, I'm obsessed about human diversity just like a marine biologist is obsessed about dolphins or a chef is obsessed with food or an art historian is obsessed with Picasso. I know that this will shock you, but there are entire academic disciplines which study both the genetics of population groups and their cultures.
 
1.) nope thats your false perception
the emotion i have is complete humor over she must have herpes lol

2.) now you are just lying i NEVER called you mentally retarded. Once again you are showing a sever lack of perception.

3.) again never implied that you care about people pointing out your false statments and the illogical nature of the logic you provided. FOr some reason you keep repeating it though, weird. Make sure you tell us in your next post too lol

5.) and again its a strawman because i have no hang up nor do i care your feelings on it lol

please try to keep up and discuss things that were actually and factually said


Alright, enough of this. Snip.

On topic, so do you think the only reason someone would have a negative gut reaction to an interracial couple is because they're racist?
 
Yeah, I think most perceptive people have already figured out there's a clear agenda at work here. ;)

You don't have beliefs? You're just a woman who does what men tell her to do?
 
Alright, enough of this. Snip.

On topic, so do you think the only reason someone would have a negative gut reaction to an interracial couple is because they're racist?

lol good grief this strawman again?

I already told you no

i couldn't possible answer that question because its such a blanket question. Making an assumption like that would be a total guess, it would be mentally retarded and based on no logic.

I even pointed out that the reason YOU pointed out seem to be a textbook example of sever insecurity and possibly other social mental issue. Never mentioned racism.

any other strawman questions?
 
Is it my problem that you don't have academic access to the source? Go to a library if you want to run it down, they can get it for you for free.



A race obsessed dating site? What are you babbling about? OK Cupid is a huge, mainstream dating site and they do all sorts of dating analysis from their massive database. They can probably tell you your likelihood of having sex on the first date. There's nothing about them that says that they're race obsessed, that's only you attempting to smear them.
They post chart after chart after chart after chart about race...no they are not race obsessed in the slightest...LOL.

You asked for links and you don't offer a one, not a single criticism of their findings, all you come up with it to call them names. Pathetic.



Yeah, I'm obsessed about human diversity just like a marine biologist is obsessed about dolphins or a chef is obsessed with food or an art historian is obsessed with Picasso. I know that this will shock you, but there are entire academic disciplines which study both the genetics of population groups and their cultures.


You have still not answered my question.

'Do you think that one 'race' is superior to another?'
 
Last edited:
Why do you include an opinion of a newspaper and omit the following from the source you quote:
.......[/URL]?

Something quite remarkable happened in London in the first decade of the new millennium. The number of white British people in the capital fell by 620,000 - equivalent to the entire population of Glasgow moving out.

The consequence, as revealed by the latest census, is that white Brits are now in a minority in London, making up just 45% of its residents.


I don't like spreading positive info about bigots.​
 
And does "the black man have the whip hand over the white man"?????

Isnt that Powells grand prediction?! Where is it!!! Where did it come true!!!!
....

No rivers of blood either.
 
You don't have beliefs? You're just a woman who does what men tell her to do?

So, you know her personally? And you have had direct access to ALL her relationships with men?

Because unless you can answer 'yes' to both questions - then you have no way of knowing how she interacts with men.

And since you made a matter-of-fact statement, yet apparently have no first hand knowledge of the subject you speak of, then I guess we must assume that you make matter-of-fact statement(s) without factual proof to back them up.


Noted.
 
You don't have beliefs? You're just a woman who does what men tell her to do?

Is that from a scene of Monty Phythons flying circus?

It mus be, nobody could possibly make such meaningless statements that would only make sence if utterd by someone like the Lumberjack or by a secretery at the ministry for silly walks.
 
I don't like spreading positive info about bigots.

He was no bigot, so you have no excuse for your biased cut & paste. He accurately predicted what would happen and his comments were well received. The people didn't want what was being shoved down their throats.
 
lol good grief this strawman again?

I already told you no

i couldn't possible answer that question because its such a blanket question. Making an assumption like that would be a total guess, it would be mentally retarded and based on no logic.

I even pointed out that the reason YOU pointed out seem to be a textbook example of sever insecurity and possibly other social mental issue. Never mentioned racism.

any other strawman questions?

I'm done debating with you until you can calm down.
 
No rivers of blood either.

To be fair. Enoch Powell was indeed a great parlarmentarian and a champion of his era and one cannot help but admire his brutal sincerety and honesty.

His speech is often misquoted because he was merely quoting from a letter sent by people from his voting district.

He started the important debate of critizising multiculturalism - which is essential in a truely democratic society which should debate and question everything.

Things did not turn out the way he had thought they would turn out and he was simply wrong about his theories of massive African and Carebian immigration.

I do not believe that he was a racist, it is simply his tragedy that his legacy is to be used by racist as a posterboy for biggotry that he never was.
 
I'm done debating with you until you can calm down.

LMAO

translation: you have nothing and havent debated yet

let me know when you do
 
Back
Top Bottom