• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Michael Dunn Murder Trial of Jordan Davis guilty or not?

So far do you think Michael Dunn is guilty of murder?

  • Total voters
    40
AGENT J said:
Translation: "no agent J i wont publicly vote or stay on topic"
Click to expand...
My stating that I have already made my position known, is on topic.
You continually trying to bait me into voting is not.
 
Excon said:
My stating that I have already made my position known, is on topic.
You continually trying to bait me into voting is not.
Click to expand...

now you are just making up absurd stories that are factually false
when you cast your vote let me know
 
AGENT J said:
now you are just making up absurd stories that are factually false
Click to expand...
Now you are being absolutely dishonest.
And as you already know, you will never know if I voted or not.
 
Excon said:
Now you are being absolutely dishonest.
And as you already know, you will never know if I voted or not.
Click to expand...

nope your statement was factually false, ill be waiting for your vote
 
AGENT J said:
still deflecting and dodging i see
prove it?
are you saying you want evidence?
Click to expand...
No. I am saying you are being dishonest again. Becaue you can't prove I haven't made my position on this case known, as I have.
 
Excon said:
No. I am saying you are being dishonest again. Becaue you can't prove I haven't made my position on this case known, as I have.
Click to expand...

I NEVER said that once, you just posted ANOTHER lie, like the other lie you posted. If you disagree simply quote me saying" you haven't made your position made." Ill wait.
 
AGENT J said:
I NEVER said that once, you just posted ANOTHER lie, like the other lie you posted. If you disagree simply quote me saying" you haven't made your position made." Ill wait.
Click to expand...
You are just trying to squirm out of being wrong like you usually do.
AGENT J said:
Excon said:
My stating that I have already made my position known, is on topic.
You continually trying to bait me into voting is not.
Click to expand...
now you are just making up absurd stories that are factually false
when you cast your vote let me know
Click to expand...
Notice you said stories, which indicates more than one thing, and I only stated two in regards to being on or off topic.

So you must be calling both factually false.

Either way you were being dishonest, as you have certainly been baiting me to vote.
Which can be shown by your numerous replies trying to get me to vote.
Which then leaves the only other thing you could be calling factually false is me stating that I had already made my position known.

Although you indicated both, which one do you say you are you calling factually false?
Because I can provide evidence of you continually trying to bait me into voting, or evidence that I have made my position about this case know.

So which dishonesty of yours is it?
 
Last edited:
Excon said:
You are just trying to squirm out of being wrong like you usually do.
​
Notice you said stories, which indicates more than one thing, and I only stated two in regards to being on or off topic.

So you must be calling both factually false.

Either way you were being dishonest, as you have certainly been baiting me to vote.
Which can be shown by your numerous replies trying to get me to vote.
Which then leaves the only other thing you could be calling factually false is me stating that I had already made my position known.

Although you indicated both, which one do you say you are you calling factually false?
Because I can provide evidence of you continually trying to bait me into voting, or evidence that I have made my position about this case know.

So which dishonesty of yours is it?
Click to expand...

weird i dont see me saying "" you haven't made your position made."

BAM! thats what i thought! youve been caught posting a lie again. Ill be waiting for that quote lol
I also am factually NOT baiting you to vote which is the lie, in fact it actually amuses me and give me pleasure that you are afraid to publicly vote it reassures everything i said.

FACTS win again and you posted two lies
 
Last edited:
AGENT J said:
weird i dont see me saying "" you haven't made your position made."

BAM! thats what i thought! youve been caught posting a lie again. Ill be waiting for that quote lol
I also am factually NOT baiting you to vote which is the lie, in fact it actually amuses me and give me pleasure that you are afraid to publicly vote it reassures everything i said.
Click to expand...
BAM! THERE IT IS!
FACTS win again and you posted lies and there for all to see.

You factually have been baiting me to vote in your poll.
And I have stated my position on this case.
You stated that what I said was factually false, when it isn't.
And as you can not prove it is (as it isn't), I, nor anybody else, will be waiting for you to attempt to show you weren't untruthful.
So continue squirming as you usually do.
 
Excon said:
BAM! THERE IT IS!
FACTS win again and you posted lies and there for all to see.

You factually have been baiting me to vote in your poll.
And I have stated my position on this case.
You stated that what I said was factually false, when it isn't.
And as you can not prove it is (as it isn't), I, nor anybody else, will be waiting for you to attempt to show you weren't untruthful.
So continue squirming as you usually do.
Click to expand...

another posted lie, let me know when you can quote me saying the lie you made up until you to it will continue being a lie and your posts will continue to be destroyed.
Facts win again
 
joko104 said:
His lawyer asked the court to pay his legal fees since Dunn is obviously unemployed being in jail and can't pay. The judge ruled he didn't qualify because his parents have the money.
Click to expand...

It was because his parents already provided the money.
 
The police totally botched the investigation from the get go. The lead detective said that when they interviewed Tevin Thompson, Tommie Stornes and Leland Brunson it wasn't even recorded even though they had recording equipment available. That is seriously messed up and I can't believe it. They also didn't get the surveillance audio from inside the Gate after the shooting. That's more evidence he said they didn't collect. They didn't search the area where the Durango fled to until 4 days later. What's up with that? At best it was shoddy police work, at worst it was corruption.

The prosecution focused way too much on what Dunn and Rouer did after the shooting. Anything they did afterwords is 100% irrelevant to the case because he was not charged with anything that happened after the shooting. Trying to impugn Dunn's character just made the prosecutor seem like a badgering jerk.

Tevin Thompson, Tommie Stornes and Leland Brunson all said they did not hear everything that Davis said to Dunn. They all also had to admit that Davis was extremely angry and cursing at Dunn. They all also admitted that they didn't hear Dunn swear express anger towards Davis in any way. Therefore Dunn's claim that Davis threatened to kill him is very credible. It's pretty much a certainty that Davis threatened to kill Dunn.

The prosecution's 3 main witnesses all lied on the stand. Their claim that Davis didn't open the door to go after Dunn is contradictory to the forensic evidence.

Screen-Shot-2014-02-08-at-10.31.53-AM.png


The trajectory of the shots clearly indicate that the rear passenger side door was partially open. The prosecution's witnesses lying about something that important and the shoddy police investigation combine to create a whole ****load of reasonable doubt.

Deliberations shouldn't take very long at all. It should be a quick not guilty verdict.
 
WOW

im finally caught up

Dunn should have NEVER taken the stance holy **** did he make himself look like a complete ass, the state totally destroyed his credibility

he is toast, a miracle would have to happen tomorrow

he said the door was a little open, then when presented with his letter he TOTALLY changed his story, he said he shot through the door while it was open and he said he "dove in to the vehicle LMAO

How on earth did he get hit by the 3 bullets that passed through the door then LMAO what a dumbass. If he dove back "when he say the gun" how did those bullets hit him????

wow, what a complete disaster for dunn LMAO

so far
-his testimony about when the music was and wasnt playing doesn't line up and has been inconsistent to his and others statments
-his testimony about how close the SUV was doesnt line up and has been inconsistent to his and others statements
-his testimony about how what he said to the SUV doesn't line up and has been inconsistent to his and others statements
-his testimony about how much he drank doesn't line up and has been inconsistent to his and others statements
-his testimony about how what he told the police about what Davis said to him has been inconsistent to his and others statements
-his testimony about when he shot and when the vehicle was moving has been inconsistent to his statements. Said he didnt know the SUV was moving because of tunnel vision but then says he knows he opened the door as it was moving???? hmm which was it? and then later said i got out of my car and ran a few feet behind his car vs he kneeled down again while it was moving.
-his testimony about how far the window was up or down has been inconsistent to his and others statements, first interview with police he said he could see a shotgun over the window vs when i looked at the back window i could see TWO menacing faces. How far is a window down for a person sitting in a car see into an SUV both rear passengers faces when the windows are deeply tinted, and then said he never saw the rear windows up later WOW, just WOW
-his testimony about how it was a shotgun or it could have been a stick or pipe vs it was a shotgun and even identified the possible gauges has been inconsistent to his statements
-his testimony about how is window is up, and his mirror is vibrating, his ear is vibrating and hurting but at the same time he could hear Davis yelling has been inconsistent to his statements
-his testimony about him saying he might have been shot at he wasnt sure doesn't line up and has been inconsistent to his statements because there was a pop on the audio but it doesnt sound like a gun lol
-his testimony about him saying he was scared for the rest of the night has been inconsistent to his statements, BUT after saying it was a "living nightmare" and that he was "looking for gangsters after the shooting" he kept his gun in the glove box and didnt take it in the hotel, and still never called police for help/protection but kept looking out for the red SUV and ALSO parked in the FRONT of the hotel
-his testimony about how it was a strange town/area and thats why he didnt call police but he lived in the area for two years LMAO doesnt line up and has been inconsistent to his and others statements his girl said they have been to that station before
-his testimony about when the music was and wasnt playing doesn't line up and has been inconsistent to his and others statements
-his testimony about how he wasn't aiming or using the sights doesn't line up and has been inconsistent to his statments BUT when he was asked that he must be pretty lucky since he hit it so often, he says "I wouldnt call it luck" then when asked "what he would call it", he had no answer lol
-his testimony about when and if he called his friend at 8:30 has been inconsistent to his statements and others statement, his friend actually called HIM, he got caught lying again, also he kept referring to him as a federal law enforcement officer which technically he is but the guy works in the department of agriculture" lol then his own girl was recalled and she said that he did NOT call his friend that the friend called him and there was NO discussion about meeting up to talk about something important LMAO

holy cow his credibility is so shot, he's toast guilty all the way
 
Muhammed said:
The police totally botched the investigation from the get go. The lead detective said that when they interviewed Tevin Thompson, Tommie Stornes and Leland Brunson it wasn't even recorded even though they had recording equipment available. That is seriously messed up and I can't believe it. They also didn't get the surveillance audio from inside the Gate after the shooting. That's more evidence he said they didn't collect. They didn't search the area where the Durango fled to until 4 days later. What's up with that? At best it was shoddy police work, at worst it was corruption.

The prosecution focused way too much on what Dunn and Rouer did after the shooting. Anything they did afterwords is 100% irrelevant to the case because he was not charged with anything that happened after the shooting. Trying to impugn Dunn's character just made the prosecutor seem like a badgering jerk.

Tevin Thompson, Tommie Stornes and Leland Brunson all said they did not hear everything that Davis said to Dunn. They all also had to admit that Davis was extremely angry and cursing at Dunn. They all also admitted that they didn't hear Dunn swear express anger towards Davis in any way. Therefore Dunn's claim that Davis threatened to kill him is very credible. It's pretty much a certainty that Davis threatened to kill Dunn.

The prosecution's 3 main witnesses all lied on the stand. Their claim that Davis didn't open the door to go after Dunn is contradictory to the forensic evidence.

Screen-Shot-2014-02-08-at-10.31.53-AM.png


The trajectory of the shots clearly indicate that the rear passenger side door was partially open. The prosecution's witnesses lying about something that important and the shoddy police investigation combine to create a whole ****load of reasonable doubt.

Deliberations shouldn't take very long at all. It should be a quick not guilty verdict.
Click to expand...

No the trajectory clearly shows that the durango was backing up when the shots into the front passenger door were fired, even Dunn said that the car was moving backward when he was shooting. First 3 shots (into the rear passenger door) car was stationary. Second 3 shots (into front passenger door) while backing out. Third 3 shots (into the rear end of car) while car was pulling away from gas station.
 
wolfsgirl said:
No the trajectory clearly shows that the durango was backing up when the shots into the front passenger door were fired, even Dunn said that the car was moving backward when he was shooting.
Click to expand...
Actually it shows that the rear passenger door was open and the SUV backed up. Exactly the way Dunn said it happened. Davis was armed, extremely angry and getting out of the truck to kill Dunn.

That crazy ****er was going to kill Dunn simply for politely asking them to turn down the music that was hurting his ears.

Dunn is a hero for killing that dangerous psychopath.
 
Muhammed said:
Actually it shows that the rear passenger door was open and the SUV backed up. Exactly the way Dunn said it happened. Davis was armed, extremely angry and getting out of the truck to kill Dunn.

That crazy ****er was going to kill Dunn simply for politely asking them to turn down the music that was hurting his ears.

Dunn is a hero for killing that dangerous psychopath.
Click to expand...

The door couldn't have been open, if the shots that went through it have hit Davis. He was shot while laying over towards the drivers side of the car in the back seat. If the bullets went through the door while it was open, they couldn't have went into the car. But you can disregard the M.E.s testimony if you want.
 
wolfsgirl said:
The door couldn't have been open, if the shots that went through it have hit Davis. He was shot while laying over towards the drivers side of the car in the back seat. If the bullets went through the door while it was open, they couldn't have went into the car.
Click to expand...
That's ridiculous. Of course they could go in the car. Where the hell else would they have went?
 
Muhammed said:
That's ridiculous. Of course they could go in the car. Where the hell else would they have went?
Click to expand...

Far outside of the passenger seat, if you line the trajectories up.
 
What if...? said:
Far outside of the passenger seat, if you line the trajectories up.
Click to expand...
That's wrong. I have eyes you know. If you line the trajectories up with the other shots and it points straight at the passenger seat.
 
Muhammed said:
That's wrong. I have eyes you know. If you line the trajectories up with the other shots and it points straight at the passenger seat.
Click to expand...

Didnt the ME say he was shot laying across the driver side?
 
What if...? said:
Didnt the ME say he was shot laying across the driver side?
Click to expand...
No.

The door was obviously open when Dunn shot. He was shooting back from the drivers seat, not the back seat.
 
Muhammed said:
That's ridiculous. Of course they could go in the car. Where the hell else would they have went?
Click to expand...

If the door was open, as you are claiming, then they would have went into the inner door jamb, or into the seat close to the door. They wouldn't have went into the right side of Davis' chest, through his diaphragm, liver, lungs then his aorta. That was the path of one bullet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom