• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should Amanda Knox Be Extradited to Prison in Italy?

Should Amanda Knox Be Extradited to Prison in Italy?

  • Yes, in accordance with the US-Italy extradition treaty.

    Votes: 18 33.3%
  • Yes, she should be imprisoned somewhere, but maybe in the US.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, Americans shouldn't be extradited to foreign nations even if they're guilty.

    Votes: 6 11.1%
  • No, she isn't guilty.

    Votes: 30 55.6%

  • Total voters
    54
If the knife was one that had never been spotted in that living area it might be more convincing. But that wasn't the case.

remember-most people don't plan on what to do if they come upon someone they are living with being hacked to death with blood everywhere. ITs easy to sit back and say "if she isn't guilty why didn't she…..

Definitely, she could have been in shock. It can't have been a pretty sight.

Also, is the alleged motive still that they killed Meredith because she refused to participate in an orgy? That's not a very good motive to kill a person either.
 
Does any of this **** really matter?

She's well tidy.
 
Definitely, she could have been in shock. It can't have been a pretty sight.

Also, is the alleged motive still that they killed Meredith because she refused to participate in an orgy? That's not a very good motive to kill a person either.

as if they were going to engage in an orgy with that convicted loser who also was convicted of it.

the whole motive thing is a complete non-starter
 
Does any of this **** really matter?

She's well tidy.

Well, yes. She's now a fugitive, and it makes for interesting discussion too. :)
 
Well, yes. She's now a fugitive, and it makes for interesting discussion too. :)
Damn you and the common sense you rode in on.
 
Damn you and the common sense you rode in on.

Maybe Larry Flynt will offer her big bucks as he did Casey Anthony. we could have a trifecta of "infamous" women whose cases got far more attention than deserved due to the appearances of the defendants.

It appears, from where I sit, the prettiest (Knox) is the least guilty. but there is no doubt that if Knox, Arias or Anthony say looked like Hillary clinton or Elena Kagan, we wouldn't have been bombarded with so much media attention over these cases
 
Maybe Larry Flynt will offer her big bucks as he did Casey Anthony. we could have a trifecta of "infamous" women whose cases got far more attention than deserved due to the appearances of the defendants.

It appears, from where I sit, the prettiest (Knox) is the least guilty. but there is no doubt that if Knox, Arias or Anthony say looked like Hillary clinton or Elena Kagan, we wouldn't have been bombarded with so much media attention over these cases

You kind of have a point, but at the same time there were a lot of outrageous facts associated with these cases too, which played a big role in the media sensation I think.
 
You kind of have a point, but at the same time there were a lot of outrageous facts associated with these cases too, which played a big role in the media sensation I think.

there are lots of murder cases each year with more "interesting" facts
 
Maybe Larry Flynt will offer her big bucks as he did Casey Anthony. we could have a trifecta of "infamous" women whose cases got far more attention than deserved due to the appearances of the defendants.

It appears, from where I sit, the prettiest (Knox) is the least guilty. but there is no doubt that if Knox, Arias or Anthony say looked like Hillary clinton or Elena Kagan, we wouldn't have been bombarded with so much media attention over these cases
I agree, but dogs should never become celebrities, anyway. I think we get enough harsh reality.

Anyone who looks like Hillary deserves to be guilty of something.
 
there are lots of murder cases each year with more "interesting" facts

But Casey Anthony waited a full month before reporting her child missing. I think that played a big role in the attention that case got, and also the fact that she was such a party hound and an irresponsible mother.

The Jodi Arias case, the woman is just an obvious psycho, and some kinky sex played a big role in that case. Sex sells! :)
 
I agree, but dogs should never become celebrities, anyway. I think we get enough harsh reality.

Anyone who looks like Hillary deserves to be guilty of something.

That's mean but funny! :lol:
 
But Casey Anthony waited a full month before reporting her child missing. I think that played a big role in the attention that case got, and also the fact that she was such a party hound and an irresponsible mother.

The Jodi Arias case, the woman is just an obvious psycho, and some kinky sex played a big role in that case. Sex sells! :)

true. Arias should die by Bongo!!
 
From what I have seen, she should NOT be sent back. for one, double jeopardy. and 2.. from what I have seen and read about the trial, there was not enough evidence for a conviction. Correct me if im wrong, but wasnt it someone other guys handprint and dna all over the place where the murder took place?
 
The same guy who argued Claus Von Bulow was "innocent" and OJ was innocent. AD is a brilliant law professor but to say he is objective is a bit of stretch

He argued they were innocent because he was being paid yo defend Claus Von Bulow and was advisor to the O.J Simpson Defence Team, if anything that shows what a superb defence lawyer he is. However in this case he is not representing or advising Amanda Knox is so is free to give an impartial view of the case, if he was being paid to represent Knox or advise her then things would be very different and he would be trying to clear her name, as it stands he has nothing to lose or gain in this case, and is merely stating the facts as he sees them as an academic and lawyer at one of worlds finest educational institutions and law schools.

I am sure if AD had been paid to defend the likes of Charles Manson, he would have argued his clients case, that's what Lawyers are paid to do, in terms of Knox he isn't been paid to defend her and can be impartial.
 
I feel a bit bad for you. I can't imagine what life would be like if I decided there was nothing new, exciting or wondrous in life out there in the wide world -- that I had everything I needed exactly where I was and didn't want anything else.

Please don't waste your emotional energy on me. Life is much clearer, easier, and less stressful when you already know the answers before the questions are asked.

Besides evidently making you, in my opinion, somewhat offensive (Italy beats the US in a number of human development index and quality of life index areas), you're also wilfully shutting yourself off from so much culture, history, beauty and experience, not just physically but mentally and emotionally, by taking the stance that there's pretty much nothing out there that interests you.

LOL. There is no place is Europe which has anywhere near the quality of life as America. Where in Europe are you free to carry a firearm for your own personal defense? Where in Europe do the founding documents give one not only the right but the duty to overthrow the Government when necessary? Where in Europe do individuals have to actually fend for themselves rather than the Government doing everything for them? The European cultures I have an interest in died with the end of the 16th Century and the beginning of the Renaissance.

Don't you find it oppressive and boring?

Not at all. It's actually extremely liberating.
 
We've all heard the story; I'm sure I don't need to fill you in.

American student Amanda Knox has, after appeal, been convicted of the murder of a British student in Italy along with her Italian boyfriend.

Amanda Knox has been with her family in Seattle during the trial, but now Italy is going to make an extradition request and put Knox in prison for the murder.

What are your thoughts on the subject?

I voted "no, she isn't guilty" but I think it would have been better if you had put for that option, "there isn't enough solid evidence to convict." That would be my preferred choice.
 
Please don't waste your emotional energy on me. Life is much clearer, easier, and less stressful when you already know the answers before the questions are asked.



LOL. There is no place is Europe which has anywhere near the quality of life as America. Where in Europe are you free to carry a firearm for your own personal defense? Where in Europe do the founding documents give one not only the right but the duty to overthrow the Government when necessary? Where in Europe do individuals have to actually fend for themselves rather than the Government doing everything for them? The European cultures I have an interest in died with the end of the 16th Century and the beginning of the Renaissance.



Not at all. It's actually extremely liberating.


There are many places in Europe with an overall higher quality of life than in the United States (Quality-of-life Index - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia), and nearly everywhere in the EU beats the US in several important factors, like healthcare, life expectancy, infant mortality, food safety, crime statistics, welfare provision and public services, including transport.

So, you are just factually, objectively wrong if you think the US has a higher quality of life than anywhere in Europe. This is simply factually inaccurate.

Furthermore, several European nations do keep the provision of overthrow of the government if it becomes tyrannical, and in fact one of those nations, France, is way better at it than you, having done so happily and bravely multiple times over the course of their history, while you only managed to do it once, and even then only because the French helped you out.

So maybe you should take some pointers from the French on how to stand up to a tyrannical government and let the people rule?

Finally, I'll address your gun issue. While it is mind-boggling to me that someone can be so cowardly and scared of their own country that they live in absolute fear unless they have a firearm with them, it is indeed possible in every single European country to own firearms -- yes, even in Britain. Rifle licenses are cheap and easy to obtain, and shotgun licenses are a dime a dozen. These simply come with a provision: Background checks, strict registration requirements, and absolutely stringent prohibition on carrying loaded weapons around where you could cause mass destruction without good cause.

Because of the gun laws here, we don't have upwards of 50 mass shootings a year. We don't have tens of thousands of our citizens dead in shootings, drive-by's, accidental discharges or friendly 'accidents' every year. I enjoy hunting and shooting as a sport -- I go to the range, where I keep my rifle (though I could keep it locked up at home, if I so wished), and fire it at the range as much as I like. Or I could drive up half an hour outside the city and shoot clay pigeons, which I do regularly. Or I could grab a hunting license and shoot game, if I had the mind to do so.

What I can't do is walk into a school and blast 27 little children with concealed weapons and automatic rifles. Frankly, you're a fool and a monster if you believe this sort of behaviour should be implicitly condoned by the government by allowing anyone to own such weapons.


To finish, I reiterate my point that you've got a warped and sad view of the world around you, and I think you could benefit from some more unbiased study of the ways other places do things.

After all, your country isn't perfect. If it was, you wouldn't be here debating today.
 
He argued they were innocent because he was being paid yo defend Claus Von Bulow and was advisor to the O.J Simpson Defence Team, if anything that shows what a superb defence lawyer he is. However in this case he is not representing or advising Amanda Knox is so is free to give an impartial view of the case, if he was being paid to represent Knox or advise her then things would be very different and he would be trying to clear her name, as it stands he has nothing to lose or gain in this case, and is merely stating the facts as he sees them as an academic and lawyer at one of worlds finest educational institutions and law schools.

I am sure if AD had been paid to defend the likes of Charles Manson, he would have argued his clients case, that's what Lawyers are paid to do, in terms of Knox he isn't been paid to defend her and can be impartial.

AD is a media darling-some would say Media Whore. hard to say what his motivations area. The only time you know AD is telling the truth is on matters involving Israel
 
There are many places in Europe with an overall higher quality of life than in the United States (Quality-of-life Index - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia), and nearly everywhere in the EU beats the US in several important factors, like healthcare, life expectancy, infant mortality, food safety, crime statistics, welfare provision and public services, including transport.

So, you are just factually, objectively wrong if you think the US has a higher quality of life than anywhere in Europe. This is simply factually inaccurate.

Furthermore, several European nations do keep the provision of overthrow of the government if it becomes tyrannical, and in fact one of those nations, France, is way better at it than you, having done so happily and bravely multiple times over the course of their history, while you only managed to do it once, and even then only because the French helped you out.

So maybe you should take some pointers from the French on how to stand up to a tyrannical government and let the people rule?

Finally, I'll address your gun issue. While it is mind-boggling to me that someone can be so cowardly and scared of their own country that they live in absolute fear unless they have a firearm with them, it is indeed possible in every single European country to own firearms -- yes, even in Britain. Rifle licenses are cheap and easy to obtain, and shotgun licenses are a dime a dozen. These simply come with a provision: Background checks, strict registration requirements, and absolutely stringent prohibition on carrying loaded weapons around where you could cause mass destruction without good cause.

Because of the gun laws here, we don't have upwards of 50 mass shootings a year. We don't have tens of thousands of our citizens dead in shootings, drive-by's, accidental discharges or friendly 'accidents' every year. I enjoy hunting and shooting as a sport -- I go to the range, where I keep my rifle (though I could keep it locked up at home, if I so wished), and fire it at the range as much as I like. Or I could drive up half an hour outside the city and shoot clay pigeons, which I do regularly. Or I could grab a hunting license and shoot game, if I had the mind to do so.

What I can't do is walk into a school and blast 27 little children with concealed weapons and automatic rifles. Frankly, you're a fool and a monster if you believe this sort of behaviour should be implicitly condoned by the government by allowing anyone to own such weapons.


To finish, I reiterate my point that you've got a warped and sad view of the world around you, and I think you could benefit from some more unbiased study of the ways other places do things.

After all, your country isn't perfect. If it was, you wouldn't be here debating today.

LOL, some of us find those moronic gun laws a major reason NOT to live in those EUrosocialist "paradises". And yes, you can walk into a school and do that mayhem as was proven in what was it NORWAY a couple years ago. No one has done such a thing in the USA with AUTOMATIC rifles.

BTW us white folks who don't associate with inner city drug traffickers have lower rates of gun violence than most white Europeans
 
There are many places in Europe with an overall higher quality of life than in the United States, and nearly everywhere in the EU beats the US in several important factors, like healthcare, life expectancy, infant mortality, food safety, crime statistics, welfare provision and public services, including transport.

So, you are just factually, objectively wrong if you think the US has a higher quality of life than anywhere in Europe. This is simply factually inaccurate.

I wondered if this might be an issue.... as a European you have no idea what Quality of Life actually means. Unfortunately for you folks it doesn't mean giving most of your money to the Government so that you don't actually have to take care of yourselves. In fact, it's the exact opposite.... so long as you've proven an ability to make the right decisions true Quality of Life means the Government being involved in as little of your life as humanly possible.

Furthermore, several European nations do keep the provision of overthrow of the government if it becomes tyrannical, and in fact one of those nations, France, is way better at it than you, having done so happily and bravely multiple times over the course of their history, while you only managed to do it once, and even then only because the French helped you out.So maybe you should take some pointers from the French on how to stand up to a tyrannical government and let the people rule?

Who was suggesting overthrowing a tryannical government and letting the people rule. I'm talking about getting rid of the bat-**** crazy Government we've had since 1861 and replacing it with one based on Morals, Values, and Social Order.

Finally, I'll address your gun issue. While it is mind-boggling to me that someone can be so cowardly and scared of their own country that they live in absolute fear unless they have a firearm with them, it is indeed possible in every single European country to own firearms -- yes, even in Britain. Rifle licenses are cheap and easy to obtain, and shotgun licenses are a dime a dozen. These simply come with a provision: Background checks, strict registration requirements, and absolutely stringent prohibition on carrying loaded weapons around where you could cause mass destruction without good cause.

I trust NOBODY. Literally. Nobody here in the US nor anyone anywhere else. That's called COMMON SENSE. The ability to own a firearm is nothing if you are not allowed to carry it for personal protection and to protect oneself from the Government. Shotguns and "hunting" rifles are worthless as the sole means to protect oneself.... Oh, that's right you're not allowed to use those firearms to protect yourself. Which makes you SHEEP to any WOLF willing to do whatever they want to you.

Because of the gun laws here, we don't have upwards of 50 mass shootings a year. We don't have tens of thousands of our citizens dead in shootings, drive-by's, accidental discharges or friendly 'accidents' every year. I enjoy hunting and shooting as a sport -- I go to the range, where I keep my rifle (though I could keep it locked up at home, if I so wished), and fire it at the range as much as I like. Or I could drive up half an hour outside the city and shoot clay pigeons, which I do regularly. Or I could grab a hunting license and shoot game, if I had the mind to do so.

Because of your laws you don't have nearly 1,600,000 civilian uses of firearms to defend/protect oneself or prevent crimes either. In fact, that very concept is illegal in your part of the world.... Or you could watch your wife be raped while you sit there bleeding to death because you can't use your guns to protect yourself or your family. 50 mass shootings a year is nothing compared to the good firearms do in this nation on a DAILY basis.

What I can't do is walk into a school and blast 27 little children with concealed weapons and automatic rifles. Frankly, you're a fool and a monster if you believe this sort of behaviour should be implicitly condoned by the government by allowing anyone to own such weapons.

Legally you can't do that here in the US either; but like most worthless laws, people ignore it regularly (as I do). Like a young woman getting a restraining order against her abusive ex-husband rather than a handgun. He'll walk right through the restraining order but won't be so likely to walk through 2 rounds of .45ACP in his chest.

To finish, I reiterate my point that you've got a warped and sad view of the world around you, and I think you could benefit from some more unbiased study of the ways other places do things.

LOL. My families left Europe over the last 400 years to get AWAY from people and things like what you're suggesting, not to promote them.

After all, your country isn't perfect. If it was, you wouldn't be here debating today.

The USA is far from perfect and getting further away by the moment as we become more like Europe and the UK. Though I will tell you, I don't debate. It's a waste of time and energy since my viewpoint will NEVER be changed.
 
I love all the Europe vs America debates. They're so productive. :lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom