• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are You Tired Of Obama's Mealymouth?

Aren't You Tired Of Obama's Lies?

  • Nope! I love him...

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    39

ChezC3

Relentless Thinking Fury
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2013
Messages
12,228
Reaction score
4,458
Location
Chicago
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Last edited:
Iran, Syria, China, Benghazi, Obamcare, Gulf Spill, NSA, IRS...Ah, what's the use...there's too many to name here.. So here is a link to 539 examples of this mealymouthed scumbag being disingenuous.

Obama supporters will go hysterical over this well sourced list of 539 examples of his lying, lawbreaking, corruption, cronyism, etc. | Dan from Squirrel Hill's Blog

Aren't you tired of it?

I know I sure as hell am...

*they're, not there* (from the poll)
I chose the third.
 
A good chunk of this list are simply assertions. I expected a higher degree of journalistic professionalism from Dan from Squirrel Hill.
 
A good chunk of this list are simply assertions. I expected a higher degree of journalistic professionalism from Dan from Squirrel Hill.

Each "assertion" has a link.
 
Each "assertion" has a link.
Not really, no. Simply labeling programs that Dan from Squirrel Hill finds unsavory as unconstitutional is an assertion. So is claiming that Obama's belief in public education was a "lie" due to the fact that he sent his children to private schools. That's in the first fraction of the list alone. Something tells me it doesn't get much better.
 
Not really, no. Simply labeling programs that Dan from Squirrel Hill finds unsavory as unconstitutional is an assertion. So is claiming that Obama's belief in public education was a "lie" due to the fact that he sent his children to private schools. That's in the first fraction of the list alone. Something tells me it doesn't get much better.

That 'something' telling you is probably a psychological aversion to facts.
 
Yes they are all the same but yes I've been tired of his blathering.
 
Not really, no. Simply labeling programs that Dan from Squirrel Hill finds unsavory as unconstitutional is an assertion. So is claiming that Obama's belief in public education was a "lie" due to the fact that he sent his children to private schools. That's in the first fraction of the list alone. Something tells me it doesn't get much better.

Did I say anything about constitutionality? If Obama "believed" in public schools why wouldn't he send his girls to one? Did you miss the links? If not than how is it "No, not really"?

Something tells me for you, the sun rises and sets on Obama's ass...

Why else the scatter shot misrepresentations in an effort to rebuke? :confused:
 
Did I say anything about constitutionality? If Obama "believed" in public schools why wouldn't he send his girls to one? Did you miss the links? If not than how is it "No, not really"?

Something tells me for you, the sun rises and sets on Obama's ass...

Why else the scatter shot misrepresentations in an effort to rebuke? :confused:

You seriously think that constitutes a lie? Wow.

So, every single Republican who happens to not own a gun is a liar!
 
Did I say anything about constitutionality?

Dan from Squirrel Hill did. He simply proclaimed multiple programs extended under Obama to be unconstitutional. That's an opinion. No links to back up said opinion with either, as you claimed earlier. Something tells me you're betting on the wrong horse.

If Obama "believed" in public schools why wouldn't he send his girls to one?

Security? Location? In either event, one doesn't need to send their children to a public school in order to believe in the ideal and access to public education for others.
 
Did I say anything about constitutionality? If Obama "believed" in public schools why wouldn't he send his girls to one? Did you miss the links? If not than how is it "No, not really"?

Something tells me for you, the sun rises and sets on Obama's ass...

Why else the scatter shot misrepresentations in an effort to rebuke? :confused:
If women "believed" that abortions should be legal, why don't they all get one? If people believe that homosexuals should be allowed to marry, then why doesn't every supporter marry someone of the same sex?
 
You seriously think that constitutes a lie? Wow.

So, every single Republican who happens to not own a gun is a liar!

D-I-S-I-N-G-E-N-U-O-U-S

You know, kinda like what you're being right now?
 
If women "believed" that abortions should be legal, why don't they all get one? If people believe that homosexuals should be allowed to marry, then why doesn't every supporter marry someone of the same sex?

Oh my...:slapme:
 
I'm just tired of Obama. Lets have an election already.
 
Obama is a serial liar and, along with Eric Holder, is one of the most corrupt politicians in American history. Every time I see him on TV I change the channel. He's pathetic.
 
Dan from Squirrel Hill did. He simply proclaimed multiple programs extended under Obama to be unconstitutional. That's an opinion. No links to back up said opinion with either, as you claimed earlier. Something tells me you're betting on the wrong horse.


Then why did you ascribe it to me? I didn't know that a link has to be provided for common knowledge, or are you skeptical that Obama's girls are in fact attending a private school?

I've been picking winners for years...

Security? Location? In either event, one doesn't need to send their children to a public school in order to believe in the ideal and access to public education for others.

Security? From whom? The little lasses didn't just start in a private school once daddy became Pres. Do all parents not deserve to know that their children are secure? Location? I'm pretty sure the Obama's have enough coin to move to whichever school district they choose.


What's further, I wasn't aware that public education was imperil? Last I checked it was compulsory. The fact that you took this particular point, a point in which all politicians glad hand shows your own disingenuous proclivity. Is there a politician calling for keeping kids from being eduataded?

Two peas in a pod you and Obama be...
 
I'm certainly fed-up with whiny rightists complaining about elections they can't win.
Even with your new-age voter suppression, all it does is piss off DEMs to get out the vote better.
Either way, you're ****ed.
Enjoy the SOTU in 6 nights .
 
I didn't know that a link has to be provided for common knowledge,
or are you skeptical that Obama's girls are in fact attending a private school?
Don't christie's kids also attend private schools, not the public ones Christie is ****king.
And Chrissie was sure a smart-ass punk when confronted, wasn't he?
Mr. Obama cannot speak this way, or he would be the "angry black man", wouldn't he .
 
Don't christie's kids also attend private schools, not the public ones Christie is ****king.
And Chrissie was sure a smart-ass punk when confronted, wasn't he?
Mr. Obama cannot speak this way, or he would be the "angry black man", wouldn't he .

I'm sure, I've never liked Christie from day one, a fat guy with a loud mouth, oh my, never seen one of those before....never understood the infatuation.

He's a POS same as the current POTUS...
 
Oh my...:slapme:
What? I'm just showing that his argument isn't sound. Obama believes in public education and that it can be good, but that doesn't imply that he prefers it over all other forms of education.
 
What? I'm just showing that his argument isn't sound. Obama believes in public education and that it can be good, but that doesn't imply that he prefers it over all other forms of education.

How do you believe in public education? Again, the premise itself is laughable, it's compulsory, you don't need to believe in it. There's no legitimate chance of it vanishing, no politician with the hopes of being elected to the highest office of the land is going to come out and say "I don't believe in education for all, I don't believe everyone should get an opportunity, and you know, since it was the Catholic church who we modeled our public school system on, that's a clear violation of church and state anyhow, so you know we just got to up and end this once and for all!"

Like I told the other one, arguing this is a demonstration of shared disingenuity.
 
How do you believe in public education? Again, the premise itself is laughable, it's compulsory, you don't need to believe in it. There's no legitimate chance of it vanishing.
That's not what I meant, to believe in public education means that you believe that it can provide satisfactory results. Use your context clues.
 
Did I say anything about constitutionality? If Obama "believed" in public schools why wouldn't he send his girls to one? Did you miss the links? If not than how is it "No, not really"?

Something tells me for you, the sun rises and sets on Obama's ass...

Why else the scatter shot misrepresentations in an effort to rebuke? :confused:

I believe that Bud is perfectly good beer.

I prefer to drink other beers.
 
That's not what I meant, to believe in public education means that you believe that it can provide satisfactory results. Use your context clues.

I'm in context. If it can provide satisfactory results than you're saying that Obama is willingly and happily being fleeced. For if the result would be satisfactory in a public setting there would be no reason to pay an outrageous price tag on a private one.

I'm not sure what you're about, but if you get satisfaction from Product A and product A costs a couple hundred bucks but you choose to go with product B, which also provides satisfactory results but comes at a, oh, I don't know, just say, $30,000 a year price tag(I'm sure I'm low balling) would you be willing to call yourself a fool for going with product B when you'll get the same satisfactory results from product A at a sliver of the cost?

No, you wouldn't, and don't say that you would. As I said. the premise is laughable and it is one which is contradictory to the entire kumbya my lord liberal we're all in the same gang love fest which you yourself claim membership to.
 
Last edited:
I believe that Bud is perfectly good beer.

I prefer to drink other beers.

So what you're saying is that Obama prefers to get the same results and pay at a premium, for what? Economic Stimulus?

Come now...
 
Back
Top Bottom