- Joined
- Jun 20, 2008
- Messages
- 106,621
- Reaction score
- 98,469
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
You nailed it.
Lonely Planet is way better than tripadvisor for this, too.
Forgot about lonely planet. That's absolutely right.
You nailed it.
Lonely Planet is way better than tripadvisor for this, too.
This is a fascinating response -- please tell me more. To be honest, I can't imagine someone not being interested in history, especially European history -- if you could, could you tell me why it doesn't appeal to you?
I haven't made it to the Louvre myself, and admittedly I'm already daunted by the rumors of how unwieldy it is due to the throngs of tourists. There are still some pretty awesome places you can go in Europe that haven't been utterly crapped out by tourists, St. Petersburg being an excellent example, probably because Russia is still such a pain in the ass to get a visa to.
I lucked out and made it into town on a Thursday, so the crowds really weren't that bad at all. I thought about visiting the Eiffel Tower after I finished with the Louvre, but I was tired, so I opted to just have dinner and turn in for the night instead.
That turned out to be a mistake. When I tried again on Friday, there was like a four hour wait just to get in line. :lol:
I'm certain through the bomb site, I'll see the millions of white flags... then I'd stand down. Jealous? of weaklings and cowards? Hardly.
There is a whole world a person could visit, unlimited choices most of which would be interesting and offer different benefits. But a person's lifetime is not unlimited. We travel, but also have limited travel time. For us, a trip to Paris would mean not taking a trip somewhere else.
Playing tourist isn't something I particularly care to do and while each big city offers what it offers, personally I enjoy it more when we fit in and can interact/talk with other people. What does Paris really offer that a person has to go there to see that is so superior?
If it were a situation that we couldn't travel without it being free, that would be a different matter. But our limitations on traveling are not economic, the limitation is time. So it's not about the $$. Paris is not on our future list of places we want to travel to.
Yes, it can happen in Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit, Milwaukee. Wherever strong Negro and Muslim gangs.
I haven't made it to the Louvre myself, and admittedly I'm already daunted by the rumors of how unwieldy it is due to the throngs of tourists. There are still some pretty awesome places you can go in Europe that haven't been utterly crapped out by tourists, St. Petersburg being an excellent example, probably because Russia is still such a pain in the ass to get a visa to.
I guess that kind of thing couldn't happen to tourists anywhere else. Oh wait...
Crowd Beats, Strips & Robs Tourist On St. Patrick’s Day; Incident Caught On Camera « CBS Baltimore
White gangs don't count, I guess.
Black couple savagely beaten by gang of white youths in Brooklyn | The Daily Caller
I
Sounds weird I know but when I think of vacation I think of relaxation. When I think of relaxation I think of getting away from the norm.
Hope that makes sense?
The challenges of being a tourist, I've found, is avoiding being corralled into all the safe, white establishments along with the rest of the Americans by the hotels and guides. .
The Louvre is great, if you're into art museums.
The throngs of tourists are only at the entrance and in a couple spots- like the Mona Lisa. The rest of the place is pretty empty because it's so flipping immense.
Another key is to not go in the summer.
It is now 68 and raining here in Uhland, TX. Forecast is for highs in the low 70s for the weekend (and no more rain) so I can finish up my current roofing job.
What is your fixation with race? You seem to constantly cite "whiteness" as if it's some disease and that it's the root of all evil in western society. You did the samething while hilariously maligning a remake spike lee did
The irony is regardless of where you travel there are "safe" and established tourist routs catering to people just looking for the "cruise" type getaway. Regardless if that route is populated by middle class locals, Indian or Chinese nationals, or the Japanese. Race really has nothing to do with people being uncultured, lazy and stupid. And sometimes people just want to relax
The Louvre is great, if you're into art museums.
The throngs of tourists are only at the entrance and in a couple spots- like the Mona Lisa. The rest of the place is pretty empty because it's so flipping immense.
Another key is to not go in the summer.
You did the samething while hilariously maligning a remake spike lee did
While I think you tend to go to Defcon 5 over nothing, I'll answer seriously anyway.
When I refer to something as being "safe and white" I'm referring to the assumption that I, as a white person, can't handle an experience unless it's been placed in a context that is displaced from its ethnic origins. This ends up getting translated into something that is so bland that it's almost not worth experiencing at all.
Defcon 5? I pulled your card for being the type of liberal that always associates a negative with whiteness and in the process simply ignores basic human tendencies.
If you ever done any serious traveling you would know those types of places exist every where and cater to what ever ethnic and national group forms a majority. The fact that you feel such is inherently "white" is what makes it funny. Just like you making a similar comment about the inherent "whiteness" of a ****ty spike lee movie.
My problem with remakes of films originally made in Asia is partly the feeling that it needs to cater to white (or simply Western) audiences, but it's more to do with the objective in the story. Western storytelling tends to be based on self actualization and the realization of one's own abilities, while Eastern storytelling tends to be based on the acceptance of destiny and one's place in the grand scheme of things. When the story crosses from one construct to another it tends to lose its point.
really, it seemed more that you weren't aware it was a spike lee movie and simply assumed such sanitizing was some inherent consequence of "whiteness".
You're not even trying to understand what I'm saying. I'm not talking about how being white or Western is bad, but about perceptions over what is safe for white people or Westerners, and how that results in the blanding down of experiences. I don't think it's an accident that every time I've been corralled into white/Western restaurants, for example, the food is a fraction of the spiciness of restaurants that serve almost exclusively its own natives.
The Louvre is enormous. I liked it a lot. And also Musée d'Orsay. And the Grand Palais. But there are endless things to see and do and most people just can't take in all in in a brief trip. One has to be dedicated and organized to even begin to grasp all of the obvious tourist places. It really becomes even more spectacular when you wander off of the tourista trail and check out the Parisian life....not the tourists life.
Well, I guess I'm in a minority. I find Paris a really unique and fascinating place to be.
I don't think you're in a minority at all. Paris attracts the third most tourists of any city in the world (after Bangkok and London) so I think you're in pretty good company. Are we surprised that the Paris haters all seem to be RW Americans?